C
Chris Phillipo
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
> By coincidence, as I ride the Web and watch the local TV news on my PIP, they are showing
> their "Health-Watch" segment, featuring the Atkins Diet. They show numerous interviews with
> those who are using or have previously tried this diet. Some educated nutritionists are also
> interviewed. The concensus is that many who use it, experience a 5 to 10-lb. weight loss in
> the first few weeks, mostly from reduced water and fiber in their systems. Then, most of them
> feel weak and slow down their activities, soon drifting back to their old eating habits or
> trying some other sort of diet.
>
> I went through the full routine wih this diet, some time ago.
> Then, ending up after a month with no benefit and having spent a lot of
> money on the more expensive foods prescribed by it, I discovered Nathan
There you have it, Atkin's
> Pritikin's dietary formula, which is almost an exact opposite of the Atkins Diet. I developed my
> own version of it, which calls for lots of foods with complex carbohydrates and fiber, moderate
> amounts of protein, low fat and very little simple carbohydrates. Whole-wheat pasta, beans and
> peas, fish, skinless poultry, fresh fruits and raw or steamed vegetables are the main foods I eat.
> It's important to understand the great difference between slow-digesting complex carbohydrates and
> quickly absorbed simple carbohydrates, as they affect your energy and fat-storing potential. I can
> follow this diet indefinitely, feel full and satisfied and can easily lose weight in a painless,
> although slow way. I also have lots of energy and have no problem with completing a hard workout,
> even if I'm gradually losing weight. Wholegrain rice, wheat and oats provide much better fiber and
> vitamins than refined grain products and they digest more slowly and enhance the sustained energy
> effect you get from their complex carbohydrates. White rice and bread made from refined flour
> break down and digest very quickly and don't give much in the way of energy over the whole day. My
> entire diet plan is 15 typed pages long and this is just the very short version. By the way, my
> diet costs much less than what I ate in the old days. Why do I have to lose weight, if my diet
> plan is so good? Because at times, I just eat too much of it-----I should say, way too much. But,
> if I stay even close to my daily maintenance amount of calories, I don't gain weight, especially
> when I ride a lot and cover several miles on foot every day. I generally weigh 40 lbs. less than
> before I started eating this way. Cut out the extra salt in your diet and lose 3 to 5 ugly and
> sluggish pounds, mostly of retained water, in 3 days.
>
>
> Steve McDonald
>
>
Sorry if I am starting to sound like a poster child but check out http://www.eatprotein.com. You
would probably get something out of reading the book even if you are happy with your current plan,
it is only $8 for the paper back, the FAQs on the site have alot of answers for free. It really
sounds to me like Atkins is all about selling unnecessary overpriced ****, if I wanted that I'd go
to weight watchers. The fact is that truly active people can get away with almost anything, it's
only when you stop burning large amounts of calories on a daily basis that we can really see what
effects diet are having vs. the effects of exercise. I would probably stay trim on your diet too
during cycling season, but I wouldn't be able to maintain the caloric intake to burn ratio during
the winter unless I was willing to eat celery and lettuce two meals day and then I'd be back where
I started.
--
_________________________
Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia http://www.ramsays-online.com
[email protected] says...
>
> By coincidence, as I ride the Web and watch the local TV news on my PIP, they are showing
> their "Health-Watch" segment, featuring the Atkins Diet. They show numerous interviews with
> those who are using or have previously tried this diet. Some educated nutritionists are also
> interviewed. The concensus is that many who use it, experience a 5 to 10-lb. weight loss in
> the first few weeks, mostly from reduced water and fiber in their systems. Then, most of them
> feel weak and slow down their activities, soon drifting back to their old eating habits or
> trying some other sort of diet.
>
> I went through the full routine wih this diet, some time ago.
> Then, ending up after a month with no benefit and having spent a lot of
> money on the more expensive foods prescribed by it, I discovered Nathan
There you have it, Atkin's
> Pritikin's dietary formula, which is almost an exact opposite of the Atkins Diet. I developed my
> own version of it, which calls for lots of foods with complex carbohydrates and fiber, moderate
> amounts of protein, low fat and very little simple carbohydrates. Whole-wheat pasta, beans and
> peas, fish, skinless poultry, fresh fruits and raw or steamed vegetables are the main foods I eat.
> It's important to understand the great difference between slow-digesting complex carbohydrates and
> quickly absorbed simple carbohydrates, as they affect your energy and fat-storing potential. I can
> follow this diet indefinitely, feel full and satisfied and can easily lose weight in a painless,
> although slow way. I also have lots of energy and have no problem with completing a hard workout,
> even if I'm gradually losing weight. Wholegrain rice, wheat and oats provide much better fiber and
> vitamins than refined grain products and they digest more slowly and enhance the sustained energy
> effect you get from their complex carbohydrates. White rice and bread made from refined flour
> break down and digest very quickly and don't give much in the way of energy over the whole day. My
> entire diet plan is 15 typed pages long and this is just the very short version. By the way, my
> diet costs much less than what I ate in the old days. Why do I have to lose weight, if my diet
> plan is so good? Because at times, I just eat too much of it-----I should say, way too much. But,
> if I stay even close to my daily maintenance amount of calories, I don't gain weight, especially
> when I ride a lot and cover several miles on foot every day. I generally weigh 40 lbs. less than
> before I started eating this way. Cut out the extra salt in your diet and lose 3 to 5 ugly and
> sluggish pounds, mostly of retained water, in 3 days.
>
>
> Steve McDonald
>
>
Sorry if I am starting to sound like a poster child but check out http://www.eatprotein.com. You
would probably get something out of reading the book even if you are happy with your current plan,
it is only $8 for the paper back, the FAQs on the site have alot of answers for free. It really
sounds to me like Atkins is all about selling unnecessary overpriced ****, if I wanted that I'd go
to weight watchers. The fact is that truly active people can get away with almost anything, it's
only when you stop burning large amounts of calories on a daily basis that we can really see what
effects diet are having vs. the effects of exercise. I would probably stay trim on your diet too
during cycling season, but I wouldn't be able to maintain the caloric intake to burn ratio during
the winter unless I was willing to eat celery and lettuce two meals day and then I'd be back where
I started.
--
_________________________
Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia http://www.ramsays-online.com