Helmets for car occupants?

"JFJones" wrote in ...

Quoted message said:

The Health Promotion Journal of Australia calls for car drivers to use
helmets:

Maybe this would discourage people from using 3-ton SUV's to drive their
kids 1/2 mile to school?

It's interesting that they use the argument that bicyclists and
motorcyclists are required to use helmets, but they neglect to mention that
requiring bicyclists to use helmets didn't really make bicycling any
safer...
--
mark

(JFJones) said:

The Health Promotion Journal of Australia calls for car drivers to use
helmets:

http://www.abc.dotars.gov.au/library/HPJA_2004-2_Road_Safety_No_Accident-Editorial.pdf

Motorists who don't uses helmets are Darwin Award candidates.

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:29:27 GMT, "mark" <[email hidden]> wrote
in message <[email hidden]>:

Quoted message said:

It's interesting that they use the argument that bicyclists and
motorcyclists are required to use helmets, but they neglect to mention that
requiring bicyclists to use helmets didn't really make bicycling any
safer...

And was in any case a response to the danger posed by motor vehicles,
which is somewhat ironic when you consider that... No, I think we can
all fill in the blanks.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

"JFJones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

The Health Promotion Journal of Australia calls for car drivers to use
helmets:

http://www.abc.dotars.gov.au/library/HPJA_2004-2_Road_Safety_No_Accident-Editorial.pdf

How far is it from there, I wonder, to a call for kids to wear helmets at
all times on the school playground? Or do they already do that in Oz?

Mark

Chris B. said:

On 28 Sep 2004 07:42:38 -0700, [email hidden] (JFJones) wrote:

Motorists who don't uses helmets are Darwin Award candidates.

I (don't really) work in an ER and can't tell you how bad it really is. We
have a euphemism for car drivers that don't wear helmets. We call them
organ donors.

/sarcastic_rant_mode=off

Austin

In rec.bicycles.misc AustinMN said:

I (don't really) work in an ER and can't tell you how bad it really is. We
have a euphemism for car drivers that don't wear helmets. We call them
organ donors.

/sarcastic_rant_mode=off

that's not xml compliant.

try..

<rant type="sarcastic">
I (don't really) work in an ER and can't tell you how bad it really is. We
have a euphemism for car drivers that don't wear helmets. We call them
organ donors.
</rant>

god, it's hard to come back from vacation.
--
david reuteler
[email hidden]

In article <[email hidden]>,

David Reuteler said:

that's not xml compliant.

try..

<rant type="sarcastic">
I (don't really) work in an ER and can't tell you how bad it really is. We
have a euphemism for car drivers that don't wear helmets. We call them
organ donors.
</rant>

god, it's hard to come back from vacation.

Plain TeX can be a little more succinctly formatted:
{\sarcastic_rant_mode
I (don't really) work in an ER and can't tell you how bad it really is. We
have a euphemism for car drivers that don't wear helmets. We call them
organ donors.
}

cheers,
Tom

--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

"AustinMN" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Chris B. said:

On 28 Sep 2004 07:42:38 -0700, [email hidden] (JFJones) wrote:

Motorists who don't uses helmets are Darwin Award candidates.

I (don't really) work in an ER and can't tell you how bad it really is. We
have a euphemism for car drivers that don't wear helmets. We call them
organ donors.

/sarcastic_rant_mode=off

Austin

Maybe each time there's a proposal to mandate bicycle helmets,
cyclists could lobby for an amendment to have motor vehicle users
included, citing the Australian source.

It would guarantee that not one more bicycle helmet law would ever be
passed anywhere.

JFJones said:

Maybe each time there's a proposal to mandate bicycle helmets,
cyclists could lobby for an amendment to have motor vehicle
users included, citing the Australian source.

It would guarantee that not one more bicycle helmet law would
ever be passed anywhere.

If you go the Source, you will find that it is not the editorial policy of
the journal but is a letter from a researcher active in sensible evidence
based opposition to compulsory helmet laws for cyclists.

He has written much good stuff on the issue.

--
---

PK

---

David Reuteler said:

In rec.bicycles.misc AustinMN <[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

/sarcastic_rant_mode=off

that's not xml compliant.

Of course it's not. It's an OS/8 switch.

Austin
--
You programmed with 1s and 0s? We only had 0s!
There are no X characters in my address

AustinMN said:

David Reuteler said:

In rec.bicycles.misc AustinMN <[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

/sarcastic_rant_mode=off

that's not xml compliant.

Of course it's not. It's an OS/8 switch.

that is sooo getting on 30-40 years ago. that wheel was reinvented two weeks
ago.
--
david reuteler
[email hidden]