Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Helmets

Started by Micheal Artinda · · Last activity · 34 posts · 1,670 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
27 March 2004
Last activity
31 March 2004
Original author
Micheal Artinda
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,670
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–34 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In news:9Nq9c.14926$oH2.14732@lakeread01,
    tcmedara <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Dart said:


    Pulled a Jon Bond. ;^) A series of stepped boulders on a
    XC bike at speed. Front end washed and I sailed head
    first at a big rock. I pulled my face up to avoid it and
    smacked my chin hard. Had a 3x1cm gash in it almost to
    the bone. Looked like I had a second mouth.

    Quoted message said:


    Broken jaw, teeth, concussion... etc???

    No fortunately. Jammed the jaw joint and it's swollen a
    bit and is difficult to chew. My molars don't quite meet
    on the right side. They took xrays of my head and
    confirmed I had no brains :^o but nothing broken. A lot
    of rock rash on my leg and chest and very sore muscles.

    Mike :^)x

    Mike,

    Glad to hear it wasn't worse. I don't envy the stitches or
    the sore noggin, but I'm sure you appreciate the exent of
    what "could have been!" Nice to see you can laugh about it
    at this stage. XC bike or not, this just proves you
    downhillers just ain't like the rest of us normal folk.
    Heal fast.

    Tom

    Thanks Tom. Yeah I don't want to think about what "could
    have been!" That rock was way bigger than my head. I'm very
    lucky to walk away with only what I got. Always have to keep
    the sense of 'hurmor'. ;^)

    Mike

  2. Michael Dart said:


    I'm warning you it's not pretty!

    pbase.com27375818

    Well it's a good looking scar anyway.

    Mike

    I've 'ad worse.....actually I've got one just like it from
    an OTB incident when I was a wee pup of only 18 years old.
    Chick dig scars.

    Tom

  3. "Xtc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    A good helmet will be light with plenty of ventilation and
    provide you with excellent protection. Prices


    for

    Quoted message said:

    good helmets start around 69$.

    Lies. All helmets certified by the CPSC - that's everything
    made by real helmet makers like Bell, Giro, LGarneau, Briko,
    whomever -will protect the OP fine. You can easily get a good-
    enough helmet for half of your $69 baseline. Also, I have
    long, thick hair and have never had a ventilation problem in
    my $29-on-sale Bell Ukon - and I wear a bandanna between my
    head and the cover (as no sweatpads can restrain my manly
    flow of perspiration).

    I'm of the opinion that helmets are the one area where
    riders consistently spend way too much money. Yeah, it's
    your head, but the cheap ones work just as well as the
    expensive ones (assuming you're not trying to do a DH run
    with a little roadie job on you skull).

    Quoted message said:

    Go to your lbs(local bike shop) and get fitted properly.

    Not necessary...anywhere that sells helmets (LBS, outdoor
    stores, -Marts) better let you yank a helmet out of its box
    and see if you can get it to fit. If you can't do it
    yourself - adjusting a strap in the back and one under your
    chin - then you have problems no helmet will fix.

    Quoted message said:

    Good luck and cover your melon.

    That part I agree with.

    Chris

  4. Chris said:


    Lies. All helmets certified by the CPSC - that's
    everything made by real helmet makers like Bell, Giro,
    LGarneau, Briko, whomever -will protect the OP fine. You
    can easily get a good-enough helmet for half of your $69
    baseline. Also, I have long, thick hair and have never had
    a ventilation problem in my $29-on-sale Bell Ukon - and I
    wear a bandanna between my head and the cover (as no
    sweatpads can restrain my manly flow of perspiration).

    I'm of the opinion that helmets are the one area where
    riders consistently spend way too much money. Yeah, it's
    your head, but the cheap ones work just as well as the
    expensive ones (assuming you're not trying to do a DH run
    with a little roadie job on you skull).

    Quoted message said:

    Go to your lbs(local bike shop) and get fitted properly.

    Not necessary...anywhere that sells helmets (LBS, outdoor
    stores, -Marts) better let you yank a helmet out of its
    box and see if you can get it to fit. If you can't do it
    yourself - adjusting a strap in the back and one under
    your chin - then you have problems no helmet will fix.

    Quoted message said:

    Good luck and cover your melon.

    That part I agree with.

    Chris

    I will agree that all helmets sold in the US have to meet
    the same safety testing standards, but I would never say
    that they are all equally safe. The testing protocols really
    don't resemble the real world at all- they simply put a
    weight in the helmet, drop it from a standard height, and
    see if it broke. Typically, the more money a helmet sells
    for the better the fit, adjustability, and not least,
    comfort. Sure, a $150 helmet won't protect an eigt pound
    weight dropped on a laboratory floor any better than a $21
    helmet will. It can, though, protect somebody's head better.

    miles

  5. miles todd <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Sure, a $150 helmet won't protect an eigt pound weight
    dropped on a laboratory floor any better than a $21 helmet
    will. It can, though, protect somebody's head better.

    miles

    I've been wondering about this. Certainly I understand the
    issue of fit on saftey, but it seems odd that not even the
    manufacturers seem to claim that the more expensive helmets
    offer any better protection then the cheaper models. Usually
    the only claims are about more holes and better ventalation.

    Aside from comfort/fit (which I concede is very important),
    what factors would make the more expensive helmet better at
    protecting your head?

  6. Brett Jaffee said:

    miles todd <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Sure, a $150 helmet won't protect an eigt pound weight
    dropped on a laboratory floor any better than a $21
    helmet will. It can, though, protect somebody's head
    better.

    miles

    I've been wondering about this. Certainly I understand the
    issue of fit on saftey, but it seems odd that not even the
    manufacturers seem to claim that the more expensive
    helmets offer any better protection then the cheaper
    models. Usually the only claims are about more holes and
    better ventalation.

    Aside from comfort/fit (which I concede is very
    important), what factors would make the more expensive
    helmet better at protecting your head?

    I'd say it's fit that makes the only difference safetywise.
    If you can get a cheap helmet with nice fit to your head
    then you are probably doing OK, safetywise. With fit I mean
    that it shall be easy to put the helmet on and then tighten
    it in the back so that it will not fall off when head is
    shook. After that the chinstrap can be fastened.

    I had to borrow my wifes helmet last year for a week when
    I'd crashed mine. It was OK fit wise, but so awful
    comfortwise that I bought her a new helmet. If you've been
    wondering. Yes my helmet cost me more than $150 😉))

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  7. I recently bought a nice fitting Bell Ukon and compared it
    to the $150 helmets. They had more holes, them same amount
    of adjustments, the same quality clasp and other plastic
    fittings. What, material or special manufacturing goes in
    to the $150 helmets that justisfies the extra $120
    difference I wonder?

    "miles todd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris said:


    Lies. All helmets certified by the CPSC - that's
    everything made by


    real

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    helmet makers like Bell, Giro, LGarneau, Briko, whomever
    -will protect


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    OP fine. You can easily get a good-enough helmet for
    half of your $69 baseline. Also, I have long, thick hair
    and have never had a


    ventilation

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    problem in my $29-on-sale Bell Ukon - and I wear a
    bandanna between my


    head

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and the cover (as no sweatpads can restrain my manly
    flow of


    perspiration).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I'm of the opinion that helmets are the one area where
    riders


    consistently

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    spend way too much money. Yeah, it's your head, but the
    cheap ones work just as well as the expensive ones
    (assuming you're not trying to do a


    DH

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    run with a little roadie job on you skull).

    Quoted message said:

    Go to your lbs(local bike shop) and get fitted properly.

    Not necessary...anywhere that sells helmets (LBS,
    outdoor


    stores, -Marts)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    better let you yank a helmet out of its box and see if
    you can get it to fit. If you can't do it yourself -
    adjusting a strap in the back and


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    under your chin - then you have problems no helmet
    will fix.

    Quoted message said:

    Good luck and cover your melon.

    That part I agree with.

    Chris

    I will agree that all helmets sold in the US have to meet
    the same safety testing standards, but I would never say
    that they are all equally safe. The testing protocols
    really don't resemble the real world at all- they simply
    put a weight in the helmet, drop it from a standard
    height, and see if it broke. Typically, the more money a
    helmet sells for the better the fit, adjustability, and
    not least, comfort. Sure, a $150 helmet won't protect an
    eigt pound weight dropped on a laboratory floor any better
    than a $21 helmet will. It can, though, protect somebody's
    head better.

    miles

  8. "alex887" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:kQ_9c.63810$cx5.54431@fed1read04...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently bought a nice fitting Bell Ukon and compared it
    to the $150 helmets. They had more holes, them same amount
    of adjustments, the same quality clasp and other plastic
    fittings. What, material or special manufacturing goes in
    to the $150 helmets that justisfies the extra $120
    difference I wonder?

    Exactly. The Ukon has the same adjustment-thingy in the
    back, pad arrangement, skull-retaining-plastic cage, and
    styrofoam compound as everything else Bell makes. The
    difference is it doesn't look as cool, have big vent holes
    (which you could conceivably argue make the helmet MORE
    dangerous), or let your buddies know you blew a hundred
    bucks on a helmet.

    If it works, it works. All XC helmets will protect you
    fine...save the money.

    Chris

  9. "alex887" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:kQ_9c.63810$cx5.54431@fed1read04...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently bought a nice fitting Bell Ukon and compared it
    to the $150 helmets. They had more holes, them same amount
    of adjustments, the same quality clasp and other plastic
    fittings. What, material or special manufacturing goes in
    to the $150 helmets that justisfies the extra $120
    difference I wonder?

    Marketing and hype.

    Pete

  10. "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Exactly. The Ukon has the same adjustment-thingy in the
    back, pad arrangement, skull-retaining-plastic cage, and
    styrofoam compound as everything else Bell makes. The
    difference is it doesn't look as cool, have big vent holes
    (which you could conceivably argue make the helmet MORE
    dangerous)

    I can only assume that the all those extra holes means extra
    r&d to make the helmet as safe as one with fewer vents. I
    suppose it might be a bit more difficult to manufacture,
    plus, if they change designs every year...perhaps that's
    where the cost comes from.

  11. In article
    <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:LNudnXnGd5OmCvXdRVn-
    [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Exactly. The Ukon has the same adjustment-thingy in the
    back, pad arrangement, skull-retaining-plastic cage, and
    styrofoam compound as everything else Bell makes. The
    difference is it doesn't look as cool, have big vent
    holes (which you could conceivably argue make the helmet
    MORE dangerous)

    I can only assume that the all those extra holes means
    extra r&d to make the helmet as safe as one with fewer
    vents. I suppose it might be a bit more difficult to
    manufacture, plus, if they change designs every
    year...perhaps that's where the cost comes from.

    The difference is essentially in the marketing, like
    expensive sunglasses, the main difference is that you've
    seen ads for it in major magazines and/or Micheal Jordan
    wears them.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-ramsays-
    online.com

  12. Brett Jaffee said:

    miles todd <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Sure, a $150 helmet won't protect an eigt pound weight
    dropped on a laboratory floor any better than a $21 helmet
    will. It can, though, protect somebody's head better.

    miles

    I've been wondering about this. Certainly I understand the
    issue of fit on saftey, but it seems odd that not even the
    manufacturers seem to claim that the more expensive
    helmets offer any better protection then the cheaper
    models. Usually the only claims are about more holes and
    better ventalation.

    I believe that's because everyone is testing to meet the
    legal requirements. It cost a lot of money to come up with
    specific tests. I know the company I work for (Aerospace)
    frequently has to do this.

    The helmets that have more venting while still meeting the
    same standard of helmets that don't tell you something about
    the design/engineering of
    it. I believe that's one of the reasons why they're way more
    expensive; those dang engineers are expensive!

    Quoted message said:

    Aside from comfort/fit (which I concede is very
    important), what factors would make the more expensive
    helmet better at protecting your head?

    Well, there's no guarantee they are more protective. But a
    well fitting helmet won't roll off or move as easy. IMHO, a
    good fitting/feeling helmet is first priority; if it happens
    to be inexpensive, that's an extra bonus.
    --
    Slacker

  13. "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I've been wondering about this. Certainly I understand
    the issue of fit


    on

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    saftey, but it seems odd that not even the manufacturers
    seem to claim


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the more expensive helmets offer any better protection
    then the cheaper models. Usually the only claims are
    about more holes and better ventalation.

    I believe that's because everyone is testing to meet the
    legal requirements. It cost a lot of money to come up with
    specific tests. I know the company I work for (Aerospace)
    frequently has to do this.

    The helmets that have more venting while still meeting the
    same standard of helmets that don't tell you something
    about the design/engineering of
    it. I believe that's one of the reasons why they're way
    more expensive; those dang engineers are expensive!

    "The idea is to raise prices and get the consumer to buy
    up. If you have a helmet at $50 with 500 vents, how are you
    ever going to sell a $100 helmet?" -Bell's Senior Product
    Manager Candi Whitsel September 1, 1997

    Pete

  14. Pete said:


    "The idea is to raise prices and get the consumer to buy
    up. If you have a helmet at $50 with 500 vents, how are
    you ever going to sell a $100 helmet?" -Bell's Senior
    Product Manager Candi Whitsel September 1, 1997

    duh, 1000 vents! Isn't that how we got the Hummer and
    Extinction er, Excursion?

    Shawn

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.