Leo Lichtman said:"AustinMN" wrote: If you hate to see the wrong argument used, why did you
go so far out of your way to divorce the comment from it's context (even
to the point of snipping it mid-sentence?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My snipping was not intended to alter the meaning, nor do I think it did.
First, you broke the thread (so that it becomes difficult for others to find
my original post (and learn what I actually said). Then you claim that your
clipped quote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of Styrofoam that can be
crushed with a finger would protect a skull
has the same intent as my actual statement:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of Styrofoam that can be
crushed with a finger would protect a skull (which, by the way, is many,
many times harder than the Styrofoam hat) from that kind of trauma?
The inappropriate clip makes it sound like I am claiming helmets can't
protect one's skull. What I'm actually claiming is that a Styrofoam helmet
won't protect a skull from a trauma capable of causing a person's brains to
be squeezed out of that skull.
Quoted message said:I prefer responses to be focussed on the point being responded to--I hate
to
wade through the entire thread over and over again as I attempt to find
what
is new at the end.
This is valid, but this is not what you did. You invented a point that was
not even there by surgically altering the sentence, removing the context and
then responding to that.
Quoted message said:Perhaps some others in this group would like to comment on this.
Yes, indeed. I'd like to hear what others have to say.
Austin
--
I'm pedaling as fast as I durn well please!
There are no X characters in my address