Road Cycling · Public discussion

Helmet saves...

Started by Leo Lichtman · · Last activity · 34 posts · 1,545 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 November 2004
Last activity
11 November 2004
Original author
Leo Lichtman
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,545
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I honestly believe that a properly shaped Styrofoam surround is capable of
    protecting what is within it. That is why I drive home with eggs in a
    Styrofoam container, and why most delicate products are packaged by the
    manufacturers in Styrofoam. Are you aware that almost all car bumpers are
    now made of such foam? It is the fact that it crushes in an orderly manner
    that provides the protection.

    That does not prove that helmets prevent head injuries, but I hate to see
    the wrong arguments used.

  2. Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I honestly believe that a properly shaped Styrofoam surround is capable of
    protecting what is within it. That is why I drive home with eggs in a
    Styrofoam container, and why most delicate products are packaged by the
    manufacturers in Styrofoam. Are you aware that almost all car bumpers are
    now made of such foam? It is the fact that it crushes in an orderly manner
    that provides the protection.

    That does not prove that helmets prevent head injuries, but I hate to see
    the wrong arguments used.


    Agreed. I was hit by a motorcycle two years ago and the indent in the helmet was better there then in my head. Last week I was hit by a car turning left right in front of me and I could not brake fast enough without hitting the car. The woman did not stop even though she knew she hit me. My other rider and a car chased her and stopped her. As I fell to the left my head was hit by her rear wheel and with the helmet on I feel I was saved a bit. I lost some meat and damage to the bike but I am alive. I am from the Gold Coast in Australia and we have to wear helmets. I have been riding for years and no matter what you cannot expect the unexpected so by wearing helmets it does help the unexpected. I do believe in helmets. Larry

  3. larryaus <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Agreed. I was hit by a motorcycle two years ago and the indent in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    helmet was better there then in my head. Last week I was hit by a car
    turning left right in front of me and I could not brake fast enough
    without hitting the car. The woman did not stop even though she knew
    she hit me. My other rider and a car chased her and stopped her. As I
    fell to the left my head was hit by her rear wheel and with the helmet
    on

    What this newbie gets from all the accidents I am reading about is the
    following.....Stay in the park so you don't get killed or get hat hair
    from wearing a helmet. Not to be flip about all this, but all the
    accident stories make me feel as if riding a bike in traffic is not
    worth it. I am too old to die this young. I made it to age 50.....I'd
    like to keep going.
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

  4. larryaus <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Agreed. I was hit by a motorcycle two years ago and the indent in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    helmet was better there then in my head. Last week I was hit by a car
    turning left right in front of me and I could not brake fast enough
    without hitting the car. The woman did not stop even though she knew
    she hit me. My other rider and a car chased her and stopped her. As I
    fell to the left my head was hit by her rear wheel and with the helmet
    on

    What this newbie gets from all the accidents I am reading about is the
    following.....Stay in the park so you don't get killed or get hat hair
    from wearing a helmet. Not to be flip about all this, but all the
    accident stories make me feel as if riding a bike in traffic is not
    worth it. I am too old to die this young. I made it to age 50.....I'd
    like to keep going.
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

  5. On 9 Nov 2004 05:08:54 -0800, Maggie quoth:

    Quoted message said:


    What this newbie gets from all the accidents I am reading about is the
    following.....Stay in the park so you don't get killed or get hat hair
    from wearing a helmet. Not to be flip about all this, but all the
    accident stories make me feel as if riding a bike in traffic is not
    worth it. I am too old to die this young. I made it to age 50.....I'd
    like to keep going.

    Riding in a car is going to kill you much sooner than riding a bike.

    Having "hat hair" beats having "wind-hair", IMHO.

    bkr

  6. "Maggie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    larryaus <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Agreed. I was hit by a motorcycle two years ago and the indent in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    helmet was better there then in my head. Last week I was hit by a car
    turning left right in front of me and I could not brake fast enough
    without hitting the car. The woman did not stop even though she knew
    she hit me. My other rider and a car chased her and stopped her. As I
    fell to the left my head was hit by her rear wheel and with the helmet
    on

    What this newbie gets from all the accidents I am reading about is the
    following.....Stay in the park so you don't get killed or get hat hair
    from wearing a helmet. Not to be flip about all this, but all the
    accident stories make me feel as if riding a bike in traffic is not
    worth it. I am too old to die this young. I made it to age 50.....I'd
    like to keep going.
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

    Maggie,

    Here's a bit of confusing perspective. This is the dialog that took place
    between me and the ER physician after the ambulance delivered me there.

    Physician: "You're very lucky to be alive. Were it not for the incredible
    shape you're in, you wouldn't be.

    Me: "Indeed, the bike is responsible for the shape I'm in."

    Bob C.

  7. Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I honestly believe that a properly shaped Styrofoam surround is capable of
    protecting what is within it. That is why I drive home with eggs in a
    Styrofoam container, and why most delicate products are packaged by the
    manufacturers in Styrofoam. Are you aware that almost all car bumpers are
    now made of such foam? It is the fact that it crushes in an orderly
    manner that provides the protection.

    That does not prove that helmets prevent head injuries, but I hate to see
    the wrong arguments used.

    If you hate to see the wrong argument used, why did you go so far out of
    your way to divorce the comment from it's context (even to the point of
    snipping it mid-sentence)? I have no doubt that a Styrofoam hat can protect
    one's head from what it's designed to protect it from...scrapes and bruises,
    maybe a mild concussion.

    But the context of my statement was where someone's brains had been forced
    out of their skull. Expecting a foam hat to protect against that is like
    expecting an egg carton to protect the eggs from someone stomping on them.

    Austin
    --
    I'm pedaling as fast as I durn well please!
    There are no X characters in my address

  8. "AustinMN" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull
    (clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I honestly believe that a properly shaped Styrofoam surround is
    capable of protecting what is within it. That is why I drive home
    with eggs in a Styrofoam container, and why most delicate products
    are packaged by the manufacturers in Styrofoam. Are you aware that
    almost all car bumpers are now made of such foam? It is the fact
    that it crushes in an orderly manner that provides the protection.

    That does not prove that helmets prevent head injuries, but I hate to
    see the wrong arguments used.

    If you hate to see the wrong argument used, why did you go so far out
    of your way to divorce the comment from it's context (even to the
    point of snipping it mid-sentence)? I have no doubt that a Styrofoam
    hat can protect one's head from what it's designed to protect it
    from...scrapes and bruises, maybe a mild concussion.

    But the context of my statement was where someone's brains had been
    forced out of their skull. Expecting a foam hat to protect against
    that is like expecting an egg carton to protect the eggs from someone
    stomping on them.

    Austin

    Wear your helmet and shut, Austin!

  9. "AustinMN" wrote: If you hate to see the wrong argument used, why did you go
    so far out of your way to divorce the comment from it's context (even to
    the point of snipping it mid-sentence?
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    My snipping was not intended to alter the meaning, nor do I think it did. I
    prefer responses to be focussed on the point being responded to--I hate to
    wade through the entire thread over and over again as I attempt to find what
    is new at the end.

    Perhaps some others in this group would like to comment on this.

  10. On 9 Nov 2004 05:08:54 -0800, [email hidden] (Maggie)

    Quoted message said:

    larryaus <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Agreed. I was hit by a motorcycle two years ago and the indent in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    helmet was better there then in my head. Last week I was hit by a car
    turning left right in front of me and I could not brake fast enough
    without hitting the car. The woman did not stop even though she knew
    she hit me. My other rider and a car chased her and stopped her. As I
    fell to the left my head was hit by her rear wheel and with the helmet
    on

    What this newbie gets from all the accidents I am reading about is the
    following.....Stay in the park so you don't get killed or get hat hair
    from wearing a helmet. Not to be flip about all this, but all the
    accident stories make me feel as if riding a bike in traffic is not
    worth it. I am too old to die this young. I made it to age 50.....I'd
    like to keep going.
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

    You don't actually exist, according to the anti-cyclist fearmongers.

    --
    "Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
    victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under
    robber-barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber-
    baron's cruelty may at some point be satiated; but those who
    torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they
    do so with the approval of their own conscience."

    - C.S. Lewis

  11. Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: If you hate to see the wrong argument used, why did you
    go so far out of your way to divorce the comment from it's context (even
    to the point of snipping it mid-sentence?
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    My snipping was not intended to alter the meaning, nor do I think it did.

    First, you broke the thread (so that it becomes difficult for others to find
    my original post (and learn what I actually said). Then you claim that your
    clipped quote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of Styrofoam that can be
    crushed with a finger would protect a skull

    has the same intent as my actual statement:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of Styrofoam that can be
    crushed with a finger would protect a skull (which, by the way, is many,
    many times harder than the Styrofoam hat) from that kind of trauma?

    The inappropriate clip makes it sound like I am claiming helmets can't
    protect one's skull. What I'm actually claiming is that a Styrofoam helmet
    won't protect a skull from a trauma capable of causing a person's brains to
    be squeezed out of that skull.

    Quoted message said:

    I prefer responses to be focussed on the point being responded to--I hate
    to
    wade through the entire thread over and over again as I attempt to find
    what
    is new at the end.

    This is valid, but this is not what you did. You invented a point that was
    not even there by surgically altering the sentence, removing the context and
    then responding to that.

    Quoted message said:

    Perhaps some others in this group would like to comment on this.

    Yes, indeed. I'd like to hear what others have to say.

    Austin
    --
    I'm pedaling as fast as I durn well please!
    There are no X characters in my address

  12. Beaker <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Having "hat hair" beats having "wind-hair", IMHO.

    bkr

    That is my husbands philosophy......he will wear a hat to avoid "wind
    hair" but I think that has something to do with a receding hair line.
    When men get older they begin to LOVE hats on windy days. ;-)
    Personally I will take "Wind Hair" over HAT HAIR in a heartbeat. My
    hairline is just fine and the wind blowing through my hair is great.
    Just my opinion. BUT...(why is there always a "but".....My hair is
    very long so maybe it would not be that great while trying to ride a
    bike. 2nd thoughts here.
    HAT HAIR...WIND HAIR....ummmmmmmm
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

  13. Dan said:

    Wear your helmet and shut, Austin!

    <plonk>

    Austin
    --
    I'm pedaling as fast as I durn well please!
    There are no X characters in my address

  14. Quoted message said:

    Here's a bit of confusing perspective. This is the dialog that took place
    between me and the ER physician after the ambulance delivered me there.

    Physician: "You're very lucky to be alive. Were it not for the incredible
    shape you're in, you wouldn't be.

    Me: "Indeed, the bike is responsible for the shape I'm in."

    Bob C.

    That's too funny. Yes indeed, that bike was responsible for both
    conditions you were in. The incredible shape and the bruised and
    battered shape. I guess there is an up side and a down side to
    everything in life. :-)
    Very witty comeback to the Doc. Can I steal it if I ever get in
    incredibly good shape and end up in the ER???
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

  15. "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of
    Styrofoam that can be crushed with a finger would protect a skull (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I honestly believe that a properly shaped Styrofoam surround is capable of
    protecting what is within it. That is why I drive home with eggs in a
    Styrofoam container, and why most delicate products are packaged by the
    manufacturers in Styrofoam. Are you aware that almost all car bumpers are
    now made of such foam? It is the fact that it crushes in an orderly


    manner

    Quoted message said:

    that provides the protection.

    That does not prove that helmets prevent head injuries, but I hate to see
    the wrong arguments used.

    I have no doubt whatsoever that helmets can be beneficial. I believe that
    every cyclist should have one and wear it.

    I totally disagree with mandatory helmet laws though. The main reason for me
    is that I believe my safety is helped far more by the large number of
    (mostly unhelmeted) cyclists on my city's (Toronto) streets. The fewer
    cyclists, the more dangerous the roads.

    Helmets help, but having drivers experienced in dealing with cyclists in
    traffic helps a lot more. And what would help the most is somehow making
    sure all urban cyclists are properly taught how to ride safely in the city.

    If politicians really cared about improving safety for cyclists, they would
    fix the problem (bad drivers, bad cyclists), not band-aid the symptoms
    (helmet laws).

    That's what I think,

    Paul

  16. On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:25:31 -0600, "AustinMN" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    "AustinMN" wrote: If you hate to see the wrong argument used, why did you
    go so far out of your way to divorce the comment from it's context (even
    to the point of snipping it mid-sentence?
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    My snipping was not intended to alter the meaning, nor do I think it did.

    First, you broke the thread (so that it becomes difficult for others to find
    my original post (and learn what I actually said). Then you claim that your
    clipped quote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of Styrofoam that can be
    > crushed with a finger would protect a skull

    has the same intent as my actual statement:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Do you honestly believe that a 50 cent piece of Styrofoam that can be
    > crushed with a finger would protect a skull (which, by the way, is many,
    > many times harder than the Styrofoam hat) from that kind of trauma?

    The inappropriate clip makes it sound like I am claiming helmets can't
    protect one's skull. What I'm actually claiming is that a Styrofoam helmet
    won't protect a skull from a trauma capable of causing a person's brains to
    be squeezed out of that skull.

    So either Leo hasn't a clue about the type of injuries helmets are
    designed and can be reasonably expected to protect a person from or he
    is quite aware and realizes that duplicity and intellectual dishonesty
    in a flimsy attempt to discredit the poster are about the only tactics
    he can muster against sound arguments.

    --
    "Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
    victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under
    robber-barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber-
    baron's cruelty may at some point be satiated; but those who
    torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they
    do so with the approval of their own conscience."

    - C.S. Lewis

  17. 9 Nov 2004 05:08:54 -0800,
    <[email hidden]>,

    (Maggie) said:

    larryaus <[email hidden]> wrote:


    \snip

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Last week I was hit by a car
    turning left right in front of me and I could not brake fast enough
    without hitting the car. The woman did not stop even though she knew
    she hit me. My other rider and a car chased her and stopped her. As I
    fell to the left my head was hit by her rear wheel and with the helmet
    on

    What this newbie gets from all the accidents I am reading about is the
    following.....Stay in the park so you don't get killed or get hat hair
    from wearing a helmet.

    What this crusty crumbly (thanks, Guy) sees is a fatal curse that
    befalls posters from <cyclingforums.com>. There must be or else
    there's prizes awarded for near-death ride stories or something. Those
    guys are dangerous. I wouldn't ride with them if I were you.

    To me it sounds like he hit the car. It happens, though it may have
    been predictable and prevented by rider awareness and preparedness for
    just such an entirely common bone headed scud stunt.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not to be flip about all this, but all the


    accident stories make me feel as if riding a bike in traffic is not
    worth it. I am too old to die this young. I made it to age 50.....I'd
    like to keep going.

    A vehicular cycling course will help prepare you for that after you
    re-gain your basic bike skills and some fitness. Stick to paths,
    knowing you're more likely to have minor collisions, and quiet back
    streets while you develop your confidence.

    Hats can be a style statement and as such perhaps shouldn't be given
    any more concern than that.
    --
    zk

  18. Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:27:45 -0500, <[email hidden]>,

    Paul R said:


    If politicians really cared about improving safety for cyclists, they would
    fix the problem (bad drivers, bad cyclists), not band-aid the symptoms
    (helmet laws).

    That's what I think,

    I think if helmet laws are effective at keeping people off bicycles
    we'll only see more of them enacted.
    --
    zk

  19. "Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:27:45 -0500, <[email hidden]>,

    Paul R said:


    If politicians really cared about improving safety for cyclists, they


    would

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    fix the problem (bad drivers, bad cyclists), not band-aid the symptoms
    (helmet laws).

    That's what I think,

    I think if helmet laws are effective at keeping people off bicycles
    we'll only see more of them enacted.
    --

    heh heh, sad, but true in many places!!

  20. "Maggie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Here's a bit of confusing perspective. This is the dialog that took
    place
    between me and the ER physician after the ambulance delivered me there.

    Physician: "You're very lucky to be alive. Were it not for the
    incredible
    shape you're in, you wouldn't be.

    Me: "Indeed, the bike is responsible for the shape I'm in."

    Bob C.

    That's too funny. Yes indeed, that bike was responsible for both
    conditions you were in. The incredible shape and the bruised and
    battered shape. I guess there is an up side and a down side to
    everything in life. :-)
    Very witty comeback to the Doc. Can I steal it if I ever get in
    incredibly good shape and end up in the ER???
    http://hometown.aol.com/lbuset/

    I wish I could claim credit for wittiness. I didn't realize what I'd said
    until after it came out. Then I thought to myself, "that was amazingly
    witty for someone lying here mangled, in shock, who hasn't yet had any pain
    killing drugs."

    I hope you won't find occassion to use it, but if you do, I hope you can.

    Bob C.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.