UK and Europe · Public discussion

Helmet-related death

Started by Colin Blackburn · · Last activity · 6 posts · 393 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
18 February 2005
Last activity
18 February 2005
Original author
Colin Blackburn
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
393
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This story is from the Evening Chronicle:

    """
    A forgotten cycle helmet lay behind a crash which robbed a woman of her
    husband a fortnight before their first wedding anniversary.

    Simon Beauchamp made a U-turn on the A1, with his wife Kerry, 27, and a
    family friend in the car, to go back to their Alnwick home to collect
    the helmet.

    But their car was hit broadside by another car driven by Adam Smallwood.

    Thirty-year-old Mr Beauchamp died after the driver's compartment took
    the full force of a horrendous impact. His two passengers were shocked
    and shaken but not injured.

    Recording a verdict of accidental death, north Northumberland coroner
    Ian McCreath said: "It must have been Mr Beauchamp's intention to drive
    his vehicle back north up the A1. For some inexplicable reason he pulled
    out into the path of the vehicle driven by Mr Smallwood."

    He lost his life through a "simple, minor mistake".

    The inquest on Tuesday heard how the Beauchamps' car stopped in the
    layby on Felton bypass as it headed south shortly after 6pm on August 19.

    Motorist Jeanne Speed said in her rear view mirror she saw it pull out
    until it was broadside across the road and was hit.

    Police accident investigator, PC John Middleton, said his examination of
    the skid marks had shown Mr Smallwood reacted well in the circumstances.
    In his opinion, no blame could be attached to him for the accident.

    The inquest heard a medical report giving the cause of death as multiple
    injuries. No alcohol or drugs were present.
    """

  2. Colin Blackburn said:

    A forgotten cycle helmet lay behind a crash which robbed a woman of her
    husband a fortnight before their first wedding anniversary.

    OK, people - before the predictable comments about helmet safety start,
    let's try to be sensitive. Remember a family has been torn apart, and
    that your words will be archived and searchable for the foreseeable future.

    My sympathies to those involved.

    --
    Mark.
    http://tranchant.plus.com/

  3. Quoted message said:

    He lost his life through a "simple, minor mistake".

    I'm not sure that "minor" is an adjective I'd apply to these particular
    circumstances, TBH.

  4. Mark Tranchant said:

    OK, people - before the predictable comments about helmet safety start,
    let's try to be sensitive. Remember a family has been torn apart, and
    that your words will be archived and searchable for the foreseeable future.

    My sympathies to those involved.

    Absolutely. I just considered there to be a very sad irony in the
    circumstances.

    Colin

  5. Simon D said:
    Quoted message said:

    He lost his life through a "simple, minor mistake".

    I'm not sure that "minor" is an adjective I'd apply to these particular
    circumstances, TBH.

    Just yesterday the Procurator Fiscal was talking to a group including me
    about this. There seems to be no way to get all or even most people to
    grasp the distinction between the action and the consequence.

    The action was a relatively common one: turning the car around to go
    back, undertaken with insufficient attention. That was the minor mistake.

    The consequence was a fatal crash. That was not minor. However, quite
    often, the same action, with the same inattention, would have had little
    or no consequence. Human beings just aren't capable of doing anything
    for any length of time with total attention. If it was essential to be
    able to maintain full attention at all times driving would be
    impossible. What happens in practice is that most of the time drivers
    recover whatever situation has arisen during the period of inattention.
    It is usually no big deal. People in general are not concerned about
    this. However, one outcome of this is that with large numbers of drivers
    having small lapses of attention fairly often, the generally low
    probability in each instance of severe consequences is still realised
    somewhere or other in the UK several times a day.

    The disjunction between the magnitude of the error and the consequence
    comes up over and over again. The law usually concentrates on the
    magnitude of the error, if it involves an offence. Hence, driving
    carelessly has its range of sentencing, driving dangerously has more
    severe sentences. However, either can have fatal consequences, or no
    consequence at all.
    --
    Joe * If I cannot be free I'll be cheap

  6. Colin Blackburn said:

    Motorist Jeanne Speed said in her rear view mirror she saw it pull out
    until it was broadside across the road and was hit.

    Thereby proving P*** S****'s thesis: speed may have been present, but
    wasn't the cause of the death.

    IGMC.

    --
    Not me guv

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.