M
Michael Press
Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
MagillaGorilla <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > On Jan 21, 7:42 pm, MagillaGorilla <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Why don't you post her times compared to today's skaters and see how
> >>supposedly 'great' she was.
> >>
> >>Magilla
> >
> >
> > This is truly impressive ignorance. Skating time today can no longer
> > be compared meaningfully to anything
> > previous to 1998 because of the introduction of clap skates. It's like
> > comparing time trial times today to those before aero bars.
> >
> > I'm wondering how you're going to get out of this one.
> >
> > -ilan
> >
>
>
> So compare to 1998. That should be good enough to show that Heiden
> wouldn't have qualified for the Olympics had she competed in the 1990's.
>
> Even Floyd Landis says the Olympics is ********:
>
> http://www.velonews.com/race/int/articles/13939.0.html
He [Steve Johnson] explained that USA Cycling is not
responsible for deciding [a sentence], they are only
responsible for enforcing it. That means that had he
paid attention, and made the decision that that was the
wrong outcome, he was not under any obligation to
enforce it. It's evident in the way the Spanish
federation has dealt with Iban Mayo, where the UCI just
goes around shopping for test results that they like.
The Spanish federation decided we're not going to
enforce that, sorry. That's what Steve Johnson could
have done - had he been astute enough to pay attention
and intelligent enough to understand it. It's possible
he's not smart enough to understand the science. But
in that case he shouldn't be in charge of USA Cycling.
--
Michael Press
MagillaGorilla <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > On Jan 21, 7:42 pm, MagillaGorilla <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Why don't you post her times compared to today's skaters and see how
> >>supposedly 'great' she was.
> >>
> >>Magilla
> >
> >
> > This is truly impressive ignorance. Skating time today can no longer
> > be compared meaningfully to anything
> > previous to 1998 because of the introduction of clap skates. It's like
> > comparing time trial times today to those before aero bars.
> >
> > I'm wondering how you're going to get out of this one.
> >
> > -ilan
> >
>
>
> So compare to 1998. That should be good enough to show that Heiden
> wouldn't have qualified for the Olympics had she competed in the 1990's.
>
> Even Floyd Landis says the Olympics is ********:
>
> http://www.velonews.com/race/int/articles/13939.0.html
He [Steve Johnson] explained that USA Cycling is not
responsible for deciding [a sentence], they are only
responsible for enforcing it. That means that had he
paid attention, and made the decision that that was the
wrong outcome, he was not under any obligation to
enforce it. It's evident in the way the Spanish
federation has dealt with Iban Mayo, where the UCI just
goes around shopping for test results that they like.
The Spanish federation decided we're not going to
enforce that, sorry. That's what Steve Johnson could
have done - had he been astute enough to pay attention
and intelligent enough to understand it. It's possible
he's not smart enough to understand the science. But
in that case he shouldn't be in charge of USA Cycling.
--
Michael Press