He MUST be stopped!

"The Bill Rodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/050930_iraq.htm

Why? these 3rd world countries are dangerous . . . aren't they?

At least I say something that sort of relates.

David said:

"The Bill Rodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/050930_iraq.htm

Why? these 3rd world countries are dangerous . . . aren't they?

In article <[email hidden]>,

David said:

"The Bill Rodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/050930_iraq.htm

Why? these 3rd world countries are dangerous . . . aren't they?

The bigger question is why "The Bill Rodgers" is even posting that in
this newsgroup.

Oh, and for those with a need to know, this is the same guy who used
to cause trouble here as "[email hidden]". He's trying to hide the
fact of who he is.

He's toned it down because his internet supplier actually phoned him
to tell him to knock it off when a huge number of people complained
with enough headers to track him down in Massachusetts - Springfield
area to be exact.

He continues to test the waters to see just how far he can get away
with it because he has a knot in his skivies that he was actually
tracked down and given a TOS warning. So he has a mad on for those
who got together and complained. Just Google the old ID and e-mail a
few of the people he used to harrass in some bagpipe groups. Why
there, is anyone's best guess. Maybe bagpipe players are better
targets by 'inter-nuts'. Well that theory is blown to hell now isn't
it. (HAR!)

He actually is trying to get another complaint lodged so he can try to
fight it in court.

Bwahah hahahahahhaha!

But we all know that *no* internet supplier is required by any law to
give anyone any kind of service, 'specially when you violate the rules.

Cross posting to sci.geo.geology, sci.astro, rec.nude, rec.running,
misc.fitness.weights gives him away - plus his posting IP and message
ID number.

For those so inclined just copy the full headers and send them to

[email hidden]

Explain that he was already phoned by their legal department and given
a verbal TOS warning about 2 months ago and that he continues to
violate their TOS by cross posting off-topic material to rec.nude.

In fact I'd suggest back dating your news programs and sending them a
few dozen just to make a point of it.

He thinks that by using Google that he is escaping Comcast's TOS, when
in fact he isn't.

---
Tin Man

PS - Psychic impression coming in... Follow up posts by him on this
will be rife with 4-letter words and other tantrum-like explicatives.
Immediate impression is a 7 year old not getting their way and
pounding on the floor in public. WHAAAAAAAA!

"He MUST be stopped ~ !

See Virgina Dare dot com."
~ TBR

"Who must be stopped ~
That white dog ~ ?"
~ Folly

On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:25:42 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Not so Bill - NK is already selling their nuke technology to other 3rd
world countries - they need cash. How would you stop them? Gentle
persuasion hasn't quite done the trick.

Not our business. Don't you get that? We are NOT the worlds police
force, and if this technology doesn't get to them vis NK, it will get
to them via someone else. but they will eventually get it. The only
hope we have, is to simply butt out of other peoples business. If we
stopped telling other countries how to act within their own borders,
we wouldn't need to be invading or bombing anyone, and they wouldn't
hate us.

The Bill Rodgers said:

Psychic impression coming in... Follow up posts by him on this

Quoted message said:

will be rife with 4-letter words

He's right, lets count them.

Quoted message said:

You are a jerk. I am in no way trying to hide my identity, I'm in no
trouble with my ISP, I've gotten no calls or warnings from them, and
I'm hiding from nobody, and I'm not posting from Google. You don't
even know what city I live in. You are just a wimpy little blowhard
piper, who lost your NG in a contest of wills, and you'll whine
forever more how big, bad, Bill chased you away.

1:jerk. 2: hide. 3:calls. 4:from. 5:from. 6:from. 7:from. 8:dont.
9:even. 10:know. 11:what. 12:city. 13:live. 14:just. 15:lost. 16:your.
17:more. 18:Bill. 19:away.
Well even a broken clock is right twice a day.

The Bill Rodgers said:

On 8 Oct 2005 17:45:41 -0700, "One-Eyed [censored]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

At least I say something that sort of relates.

Just another of my stalkers ID's to plonk. You really need to get a
life. Is your [censored] so big now, that you think you'll save the world
from me, and I'll just magically dissapear? You're just pathetic.
<PLONK>

Anyone have a good Agent filter for this troll?

--
Is this thing on?

On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 04:47:53 GMT, Joe Humble <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Anyone have a good Agent filter for this troll?

If you want to plonk me, just use my message ID. It's the only one I
use.
Bye bye

Beta said:

X-Complaints-To: [email hidden]

Done.

In article <[email hidden]>,

The Bill Rodgers said:

You are a jerk. I am in no way trying to hide my identity, I'm in no
trouble with my ISP, I've gotten no calls or warnings from them, and
I'm hiding from nobody, and I'm not posting from Google. You don't
even know what city I live in. You are just a wimpy little blowhard
piper, who lost your NG in a contest of wills, and you'll whine
forever more how big, bad, Bill chased you away.

Never was a piper.

Never frequented that news group.

Well, at least you made it clear that you are in fact "[email hidden]"
in another set of clothes.

Gotcha!

TMA

PS - My contact inside Comcast says otherwise. Naughty monkey.

The Bill Rodgers said:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:25:42 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Not so Bill - NK is already selling their nuke technology to other 3rd
world countries - they need cash. How would you stop them? Gentle
persuasion hasn't quite done the trick.

Not our business. Don't you get that? We are NOT the worlds police
force, and if this technology doesn't get to them vis NK, it will get
to them via someone else. but they will eventually get it. The only
hope we have, is to simply butt out of other peoples business. If we
stopped telling other countries how to act within their own borders,
we wouldn't need to be invading or bombing anyone, and they wouldn't
hate us.

Ok "Bill" so we should stick our heads in the sand and ignore
everything going on in the World?
Are you saying that if we ignore the Terrorists they will go away?

As to the "Hate", I think you have enough self-Hate for the entire
World.

Tin Man Alley said:

Never was a piper.

You say that like I give a f**k?

Quoted message said:

Never frequented that news group.

I never said I didn't. I did, and I'm proud I kicked all your fat
butts.

Quoted message said:

Well, at least you made it clear that you are in fact "[email hidden]"
in another set of clothes.

Again, I'm proud, not anonymous. This NG has known my real name since
day one, so your lies about me pretending to be somebody else is
pathetic. You also claimed I was using Google, when in fact I have
been posting from here ever since I got high speed internet service.

Quoted message said:

Gotcha!

TMA

PS - My contact inside Comcast says otherwise. Naughty monkey.

You just keep making up stupider [censored] everytime you post, don't you?
You are a ridiculous punk.
<PLONK> like the rest of your ID's.

On 9 Oct 2005 15:58:15 -0700, "Clan_MacKay" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Ok "Bill" so we should stick our heads in the sand and ignore
everything going on in the World?
Are you saying that if we ignore the Terrorists they will go away?

Are you really that stupid pervert? They are terrorizing us because we
meddle in other peoples business. Get out of Israel, Palestinians, and
every other countrys affairs, and Yes they would leave us alone. How
can you be so arrogant as to think we have a right to bomb Saddam, or
NK, or Iran? We simply do not.

Quoted message said:

As to the "Hate", I think you have enough self-Hate for the entire
World.

I love myself, it's jerks like you who molest children I hate.

Mental_Monster said:

I have never seen anything that says that Clan has any part in any
child molestation, lying makes you look like even more of a fool then
ever.
If you have real proof let's see it.

Google his posts idiot. You will find how he loves parading around
exposing his genitals to children. There are hundreds of posts like
that from him, plus his "family nudity" website. He's as sick as they
get.

"The Bill Rodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:13:26 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

The principle is the same. >

It is, but the reality of the situation is nowhere near the same. You
can't compare a threat to the world, to a tiny little dictator who
couldn't even control his own people within his own borders. [censored]
was a charismatic, intelligent, leader, and that made him a threat to
the world. Saddam was a [censored], who nearly everyone but his own family
hated. If Sadam had risen to Hitlers heights, or even shown a
propensity to do so, I'd have no problem bombing him to hell. Our
entrance into Hitlers war was condoned by the world. Our entrance into
Iraq was condemned by the world. Do you see the difference now?

Quoted message said:

You believe in negotiation as if every adversary
is in good faith. The Moslem extremists are not interested. They have only
one goal and that is to destroy the west. So what will you say to them?

I do not believe in negotiating with terrorists. I do believe in MYOB
in other countrys. If we did so, there'd be no need to negotiate with
anyone.

If you believed that there was solid evidence that Saddam had WMD, (don;t
forget even his own people believed that was the case as did every
intelligence agency in the world) - and believed that Saddam was supporting
terrorists interested in the destruction of the USA and all this in the
aftermath of 7/11, would you have just sat on your hands? (Sure mistakes
were made and hindsight is a wonderful thing.)

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:34:42 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

If you believed that there was solid evidence that Saddam had WMD, (don;t
forget even his own people believed that was the case as did every
intelligence agency in the world) -

More lies. I did not believe it, and most other countrys denied it was
true also. Where do you get these pipe dreams from?

Quoted message said:

and believed that Saddam was supporting
terrorists interested in the destruction of the USA and all this in the
aftermath of 7/11,

I did not, nor did the world. He was incapable of doing anything to
us. I guess you missed the part where Bushit admitted the intel was
wrong? Oh yeah, you don't want to hear or remember that part.

And I think 711 is better off with towel heads working there.

Quoted message said:

would you have just sat on your hands? (Sure mistakes
were made and hindsight is a wonderful thing.)

The mistakes were not mistakes, they were purposely invented lies by
Bush, and his intelligence people. The rest of the world did not
believe him to be a threat to anyone, hence the reason we told not to
bomb or invade.
Again, when faced with logic, you come up with republican Bushit
instead of reality-based statements.

"The Bill Rodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:34:42 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

If you believed that there was solid evidence that Saddam had WMD, (don;t
forget even his own people believed that was the case as did every
intelligence agency in the world) -

More lies. I did not believe it, and most other countrys denied it was
true also. Where do you get these pipe dreams from?

Quoted message said:

and believed that Saddam was supporting
terrorists interested in the destruction of the USA and all this in the
aftermath of 7/11,

I did not, nor did the world. He was incapable of doing anything to
us. I guess you missed the part where Bushit admitted the intel was
wrong? Oh yeah, you don't want to hear or remember that part.

And I think 711 is better off with towel heads working there.

Quoted message said:

would you have just sat on your hands? (Sure mistakes
were made and hindsight is a wonderful thing.)

The mistakes were not mistakes, they were purposely invented lies by
Bush, and his intelligence people. The rest of the world did not
believe him to be a threat to anyone, hence the reason we told not to
bomb or invade.
Again, when faced with logic, you come up with republican Bushit
instead of reality-based statements.

I don;t follow the Republican party in any way. I live in Oz. But I would be
interested to know why the war had the support of Democrats as well as
Republicans - they all had access to the same intelligence that showed
Saddam had WMD. Even Iraqs military leaders believed that - Saddam wanted
the world to believe that he had these weapons as that might have proved to
be a deterrent. I can't fault Bush for believing the intelligence reports

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:03:00 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

I don;t follow the Republican party in any way. I live in Oz. But I would be
interested to know why the war had the support of Democrats as well as
Republicans -

Because the media branded anyone who was against it a "terrorist" and
unamerican. I personally did not believe it, nor did most of the
people I spoke with. However we were told to STFU, and I was actually
reported to the homoland security people because I called it a pack of
lies.

Quoted message said:

they all had access to the same intelligence that showed
Saddam had WMD. Even Iraqs military leaders believed that - Saddam wanted
the world to believe that he had these weapons as that might have proved to
be a deterrent. I can't fault Bush for believing the intelligence reports

Where did you get that Iraqi leaders believed it? Honest to god, you
are brain damaged to write such [censored]. And ex leaders who MAY have said
this (this is the first I ever heard of this) had a personal grudge
against Saddam to explain their opinions.
Even if he really had them, he was not stupid enough to use them on
anyone, or sell them to anyone after what we did to him. He was NO
THREAT to anyone but his own people. Period. You can make up all the
imaginary scenarios you want, it won't make it true. Did you see Colon
(no spelling error there) Powell on TV with his "proof"? A chinese
menu of lies? Every expert on people lieing saw it on his face, and
heard it in his voice. Why would anyone believe it, except that they
trusted our governments word over the rest of the world.
If anyone really deserves balme, it's the media that failed to print
the truth.

"The Bill Rodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:03:00 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

I don;t follow the Republican party in any way. I live in Oz. But I would
be
interested to know why the war had the support of Democrats as well as
Republicans -

Because the media branded anyone who was against it a "terrorist" and
unamerican. I personally did not believe it, nor did most of the
people I spoke with. However we were told to STFU, and I was actually
reported to the homoland security people because I called it a pack of
lies.

Quoted message said:

they all had access to the same intelligence that showed
Saddam had WMD. Even Iraqs military leaders believed that - Saddam wanted
the world to believe that he had these weapons as that might have proved
to
be a deterrent. I can't fault Bush for believing the intelligence reports

Where did you get that Iraqi leaders believed it? Honest to god, you
are brain damaged to write such [censored].

Read this report - you will see that "Saddam convinced his top military
commanders that Iraq did indeed possess WMD . . . . ."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_war

Quoted message said:

And ex leaders who MAY have said
this (this is the first I ever heard of this) had a personal grudge
against Saddam to explain their opinions.
Even if he really had them, he was not stupid enough to use them on
anyone, or sell them to anyone after what we did to him. He was NO
THREAT to anyone but his own people. Period. You can make up all the
imaginary scenarios you want, it won't make it true. Did you see Colon
(no spelling error there) Powell on TV with his "proof"? A chinese
menu of lies? Every expert on people lieing saw it on his face, and
heard it in his voice. Why would anyone believe it, except that they
trusted our governments word over the rest of the world.
If anyone really deserves balme, it's the media that failed to print
the truth.