he is innocent

"Steve" <h90943@hotmaildotcom> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Now that I better understand the forces behind Floyd I fully believe him.
As
I said before, too much did not make sense about all of this.

I am glad that he has the best lawyer in that business. I hope that they
sue
[censored] for every last Pound in his bank account.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2006-09-19-jacobs-doping_x.htm

I believe Floyd. However, with Jacobs behind Tyler, what gives ? Did
Tyler
ever state that he NEVER reused his blood ?

Whatever lawyer he comes up with, and whichever explanation and excuse they
make regarding the test, or the method, and whatever proof they invent that
he has an abnormally high level of "normal" testo...they can never erase the
pictures and live stream of Floyd on the bike that day. No doubt he was
under the influence of something, yelling at the mecs, agressively crossing
the finish line, fighting off reporters surrounding him. He even had that
same possessed look during the interview long after the stage. Man, was he
loaded.

Henrik B

You guys are such muppets.

Steve said:

Now that I better understand the forces behind Floyd I fully believe him. As
I said before, too much did not make sense about all of this.

that USA Today article brought you to this conclusion? That's downright
hilarious. The article was no more instructive than the weather section.

Steve said:

Now that I better understand the forces behind Floyd I fully believe him. As
I said before, too much did not make sense about all of this.

that USA Today article brought you to this conclusion? That's downright
hilarious. The article was no more instructive than the weather section.

HBJensen said:

"Steve" <h90943@hotmaildotcom> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Now that I better understand the forces behind Floyd I fully believe him.
As
I said before, too much did not make sense about all of this.

I am glad that he has the best lawyer in that business. I hope that they
sue
[censored] for every last Pound in his bank account.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2006-09-19-jacobs-doping_x.htm

I believe Floyd. However, with Jacobs behind Tyler, what gives ? Did
Tyler
ever state that he NEVER reused his blood ?

Whatever lawyer he comes up with, and whichever explanation and excuse they
make regarding the test, or the method, and whatever proof they invent that
he has an abnormally high level of "normal" testo...they can never erase the
pictures and live stream of Floyd on the bike that day. No doubt he was
under the influence of something, yelling at the mecs, agressively crossing
the finish line, fighting off reporters surrounding him. He even had that
same possessed look during the interview long after the stage. Man, was he
loaded.

Henrik B

Spoken like a true non-athlete...

He was just as aggressive after the last TT. Maybe you missed that...

Jim

Steve said:

I believe Floyd. However, with Jacobs behind Tyler, what gives ? Did Tyler
ever state that he NEVER reused his blood ?

I never saw Hamilton to have stated this. Always other people's blood.

Steve said:

I believe Floyd. However, with Jacobs behind Tyler, what gives ? Did Tyler
ever state that he NEVER reused his blood ?

I never saw Hamilton to have stated this. Always other people's blood.

Steve said:

Now that I better understand the forces behind Floyd I fully believe him. As
I said before, too much did not make sense about all of this.

I am glad that he has the best lawyer in that business. I hope that they sue
[censored] for every last Pound in his bank account.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2006-09-19-jacobs-doping_x.htm

I believe Floyd. However, with Jacobs behind Tyler, what gives ? Did Tyler
ever state that he NEVER reused his blood ?

I miss Johnny Cochran.

HBJensen said:

No doubt he was
under the influence of something, yelling at the mecs, agressively crossing
the finish line, fighting off reporters surrounding him. He even had that
same possessed look during the interview long after the stage. Man, was he
loaded.

He was under the influence of being [censored]... it can be a pretty
good drug if used wisely. It is also interesting that his testosterone
level wasn't even high... it was just a high t/e ratio. And who knows
what effect the biggest solo one day comeback in the history of the
sport might have on someone's t/e ratio... especially if they do it
with an attitude?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Ron Ruff said:

HBJensen said:

No doubt he was
under the influence of something, yelling at the mecs, agressively crossing
the finish line, fighting off reporters surrounding him. He even had that
same possessed look during the interview long after the stage. Man, was he
loaded.

He was under the influence of being [censored]... it can be a pretty
good drug if used wisely. It is also interesting that his testosterone
level wasn't even high... it was just a high t/e ratio. And who knows
what effect the biggest solo one day comeback in the history of the
sport might have on someone's t/e ratio... especially if they do it
with an attitude?

Ron: how do you explain away his transgression of the Millar Line?

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

In article <[email hidden]>,

DepartFictif said:

You guys are such muppets.

Is that good or bad?

Enjoying cyclocross season, wish I didn't weigh 6 kg more than last year,

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

DepartFictif said:

Quoted message said:

You guys are such muppets.

Ryan Cousineau said:

Is that good or bad?
Enjoying cyclocross season, wish I didn't weigh 6 kg more than last year,

Are you trying to say you're miss piggy ?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

DepartFictif said:

Quoted message said:

You guys are such muppets.

Ryan Cousineau said:

Is that good or bad?
Enjoying cyclocross season, wish I didn't weigh 6 kg more than last year,

Are you trying to say you're miss piggy ?

I'm just saying that I'm a pave-the-earth right-wing kook type, and yet
I end up commuting by bike the vast majority of the time. I get funny
looks from people when I tell them my route, and even funnier ones when
I tell them it takes me 30 minutes (it's not that impressive). I do this
even in the winter. I think at this point I have converted somewhere
between one and three people into regular bike commuters, and one of
those would be my own father, who had commuted by bike as long ago as
the early 80s.

So when I ride to work, despite the fact I like it very much, I
understand that it's an odd thing to do, both for me personally and for
others generally. And yet it's the most environmentally sound commute I
could make.

In other words, it's not easy being green.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

Ryan Cousineau said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Ron Ruff said:

HBJensen said:

No doubt he was
under the influence of something, yelling at the mecs, agressively crossing
the finish line, fighting off reporters surrounding him. He even had that
same possessed look during the interview long after the stage. Man, was he
loaded.

He was under the influence of being [censored]... it can be a pretty
good drug if used wisely. It is also interesting that his testosterone
level wasn't even high... it was just a high t/e ratio. And who knows
what effect the biggest solo one day comeback in the history of the
sport might have on someone's t/e ratio... especially if they do it
with an attitude?

Ron: how do you explain away his transgression of the Millar Line?

Mountains void the Millar Line. Of course anyone over 150 pounds who wins a
mountain stage is doped, but that's a different issue and doesn't relate to the
Millar Line.

Ron

HBJensen said:

Whatever lawyer he comes up with, and whichever explanation and excuse they
make regarding the test, or the method, and whatever proof they invent that
he has an abnormally high level of "normal" testo...they can never erase the
pictures and live stream of Floyd on the bike that day. No doubt he was
under the influence of something, yelling at the mecs, agressively crossing
the finish line,

I think RBR should replace the Millar Line with
"aggressively crossing the finish line" as its
new standard for prima facie evidence of doping.

Ben
passive-aggressively crossing the finish line

DepartFictif said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> You guys are such muppets.

Ryan Cousineau said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is that good or bad?
Enjoying cyclocross season, wish I didn't weigh 6 kg more than last year,

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

Are you trying to say you're miss piggy ?

Ryan Cousineau said:

So when I ride to work, despite the fact I like it very much, I
understand that it's an odd thing to do, both for me personally and for
others generally. And yet it's the most environmentally sound commute I
could make.

In other words, it's not easy being green.

You could always use the proceeds from your LiveDrunk(tm)shares to buy one
of these:
http://www.worldcarfans.com/tuners.cfm/tunerid/7050509.001/country/acf/Hummer/maximum-green-hummer-h2-by-geigercars

Quoted message said:

I think RBR should replace the Millar Line with
"aggressively crossing the finish line" as its
new standard for prima facie evidence of doping.

The inverse Arndt law.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

I think RBR should replace the Millar Line with
"aggressively crossing the finish line" as its
new standard for prima facie evidence of doping.

The inverse Arndt law.

And yet, once again, David Millar leads the way:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/riders/2003/interviews/?id=davidmillar03

"He was hit by a car on the Angliru climb and made his protest about the
race's poor organization in a rare and controversial way by stopping
short of the finish line and handing in his number."

Least aggressive finish-line move ever,

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

DepartFictif said:

Quoted message said:

>> You guys are such muppets.

Ryan Cousineau said:

Quoted message said:

> Is that good or bad?
> Enjoying cyclocross season, wish I didn't weigh 6 kg more than last
> year,

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

Are you trying to say you're miss piggy ?

Ryan Cousineau said:

So when I ride to work, despite the fact I like it very much, I
understand that it's an odd thing to do, both for me personally and for
others generally. And yet it's the most environmentally sound commute I
could make.

In other words, it's not easy being green.

You could always use the proceeds from your LiveDrunk(tm)shares to buy one
of these:

http://www.worldcarfans.com/tuners.cfm/tunerid/7050509.001/country/acf/Hu
mmer/maximum-green-hummer-h2-by-geigercars

And yet, once again, my taste conflicts with my politics: I have no
interest in SUVs in any capacity. Is it so wrong to want a Tesla more
than one of these? Would it help if I just burned more firewood in my
backyard fireplace?

I need to eat a rum-soaked fig,

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos