Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could make
Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that in
spades.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Has Lafferty Lost His Sporting Credibility?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 28 June 2006
- Last activity
- 30 June 2006
- Original author
- Tom Kunich
- Posts
- 12
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 503
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Tom Kunich said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could make
Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that in
spades.He has much more credibility than you do Mr. Kunich.
-
Tom Kunich said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could make
Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that in
spades.He has much more credibility than you do Mr. Kunich.
-
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could
make Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that
in spades.Why do you even bother with silly posts like this? I think that people
would take you more seriously if you refuted the opinions expressed in posts
instead of juvenile attacks of the posters. -
Frank Drackman said:
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could
make Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that
in spades.Why do you even bother with silly posts like this?
OOOH! I know why he does it!
It's cause he's an idiot.
-RJ
-
"ronaldo_jeremiah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Frank Drackman said:
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could
make Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves
that
in spades.Why do you even bother with silly posts like this?
OOOH! I know why he does it!
It's cause he's an idiot.
I am sure that he is a smart person, but you are correct that he comes
across as a total idiot. Because of his history it seems that his "real"
get ignored or attacked. -
"steve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could
make
Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that in
spades.He has much more credibility than you do Mr. Kunich.
Some dumbass criticizing me. Well, now that really disturbs me.
-
in message <[email hidden]>, Tom
Kunich (') said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could
make Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves
that in spades.Pot, meet Kettle.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/IMHO, there aren't enough committed Christians, but that's care
in the community for you. -- Ben Evans -
Tom Kunich said:
Has he ever had any? There are very few people in this world that could make
Howard Dean look like an ethical intellectual but Brian achieves that in
spades.Average minds discuss people.
Good minds discuss events.
Great minds discuss ideas.When do you want to improve?
In fact, that question could be asked of a large chunk of the average
user on Usenet -
"EatMe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Great minds discuss ideas.And your idea is????
-
Sandy said:
Look at it differently. Armstrong is the ONLY one who has a cadre of
apologists (professional and popular) who steadfastly believe he is the
only clean modern god.Hmmm. Do you have evidence for this?
Quoted message said:
If Brian harps on it, it's because people
believe readily, and without evidence, in the baseness of all other
ridersHmmm. Do you have evidence for this?
-
Dans le message de news:[email hidden],
Robert Chung <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :Quoted message said:
Sandy said:
Look at it differently. Armstrong is the ONLY one who has a cadre of
apologists (professional and popular) who steadfastly believe he is
the only clean modern god.Hmmm. Do you have evidence for this?
Quoted message said:
If Brian harps on it, it's because people
believe readily, and without evidence, in the baseness of all other
ridersHmmm. Do you have evidence for this?
For my standard hourly rate, name the evidence you want, and I'll bill you
at the end of the month.In short - could be ;-)
--
Sandy
-
Darwinism, born in ideological struggle, has never escaped from an intimate
reciprocal relationship with worldviews exported from and imported into the
science. No one challenges the claim that evolutionary theory has had a wide
effect on social theory. It is a cliché of cultural history that the
explanation of evolution by natural selection served as an ideological
justification for laissez-faire capitalism and the colonial domination of
the lesser breeds without the law- Richard Lewontin
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.