Pete Jones <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:On 24 Jan 2004 12:37:00 -0800, [email hidden] (JD) blathered:
Quoted message said:More people are beginning to notice this as a problem, not just harmless fun. The hinky re-
designations are interesting as well. I wonder what is going to be found as they dig deeper into
this situation?sounds like i'd get on with mr. bridgers. it's ironic that i've broken my arm just as i'd come to
the decision to concentrate more on climbing again rather than mountain-biking. i realised that i
considered most mountain bikers i was meeting to be [censored], and i'm attracted to activities which
have an ethical code that extends beyond 'spend, spend, spend'.
The media tends to make being ethical about anything much less than stylish, so those "tats" are
just a product of media hype and the mass marketing of mountain biking. The climbing community will
always benefit from not being very stylish and too much work for trendoids to really permeate their
sport. Climbing ethics will never be threatened by the mass media the way mountain biking has the
last ten years.
As I did last Summer and have continued to do, my rides tend to be longer and the further out you
get, the more difficult the route, and the less known the area, one tends to encounter fewer
"[censored]". Making your own slice of heaven on two wheels is definitely the answer.
JD