Hamilton's wife?

Rik Van Diesel said:

He isn't as dumb as I thought, he just has no morals. "I swear on her
life" NO CLASS!!

He said that about 1996:
http://www.tdfblog.com/2004/07/hamilton_i_swea.html

Nothing about 2004...

In any case, I withhold judgement on the current affair -- let's see what happens
with his explanation.

Dan

Dan Connelly d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g said:

In any case, I withhold judgement on the current affair -- let's see what happens
with his explanation.

His explanation should be very interesting.

Although there is a chance that he might cop to it and take the suspension.

I wonder if Lance will be issuing any supportive statements.

Or what Riis might have to say on the matter.

--
le Vent a Dos, Davey Crockett
Six Day Site: http://sixday.741.com/
Latest news at http://sixday.741.com/news.html

Quoted message said:

Or what Riis might have to say on the matter.

Interesting suggestive comment on a Dutch news site: "Hamilton abandoned
the Tour this year with a back injury. He recovered quickly, because in
August the 33-yr old American became Olympic champion in the TT.
Hamilton then comprehensively thanked his training advisor, Italian
Luigi Cecchini, who among others also assisted Bjarne Riis when he won
the 1996 Tour de France by surprise."

Source: http://nu.nl/news.jsp?n=413354&c=45

Dan Connelly d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g said:

Rik Van Diesel said:

He isn't as dumb as I thought, he just has no morals. "I swear on her
life" NO CLASS!!

Quoted message said:

He said that about 1996:
http://www.tdfblog.com/2004/07/hamilton_i_swea.html

Quoted message said:

Nothing about 2004...

Quoted message said:

In any case, I withhold judgement on the current affair -- let's see what happens
with his explanation.

The part I found interesting is in the comment section:
-------------
I believe him 100%. Tyler is the real deal. Best wishes to him for a full
and speedy recovery and to bring some hardware home from Athens next month!

Posted by: lancefan at July 28, 2004 12:17 AM
-------------

Explaining previously undisclosed surgery is going to be tough.

Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Although there is a chance that he might cop to it and take the suspension.

At 33 I'm not sure there would be any point. More likely would be the
Neil Stephens or Oscar Camenzind approach of just walking away into
retirement.

No two ways about it, if this holds up it is the end of his career.
His chances of sitting out two years and coming back at 35 are
slim.

Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]

Ewoud Dronkert <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Or what Riis might have to say on the matter.

Interesting suggestive comment on a Dutch news site: "Hamilton abandoned
the Tour this year with a back injury. He recovered quickly, because in
August the 33-yr old American became Olympic champion in the TT.
Hamilton then comprehensively thanked his training advisor, Italian
Luigi Cecchini, who among others also assisted Bjarne Riis when he won
the 1996 Tour de France by surprise."

Source: http://nu.nl/news.jsp?n=413354&c=45

You must have missed where Tyler said the ITT was ok because it was
fairly flat, otherwise he wouldn't have been there. Before the
Olympic races he was showing off his fine roadrash collection, yet
again.

Bob Schwartz <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Dan Connelly d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g said:

Rik Van Diesel said:

He isn't as dumb as I thought, he just has no morals. "I swear on her
life" NO CLASS!!

Quoted message said:

He said that about 1996:
http://www.tdfblog.com/2004/07/hamilton_i_swea.html

Quoted message said:

Nothing about 2004...

Quoted message said:

In any case, I withhold judgement on the current affair -- let's see what happens
with his explanation.

The part I found interesting is in the comment section:
-------------
I believe him 100%. Tyler is the real deal. Best wishes to him for a full
and speedy recovery and to bring some hardware home from Athens next month!

Posted by: lancefan at July 28, 2004 12:17 AM
-------------

Explaining previously undisclosed surgery is going to be tough.

Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]

Maybe surgery on his back? Though that should hardly have required a transfusion.

Richard Adams said:

Maybe surgery on his back? Though that should hardly have required a transfusion.

Journal entry on 27th July don't explicitly mention surgery, but hint
that MRIs and X-rays have ruled out fractures.

If we count 60 days back from now, the window for transfusions to show
up in the test (working on 6-8 week sensitivity) covers both the
Olympics and the Tour. What happened between Athens and Vuleta is
irrelevant, so firm detail on Tyler's whereabouts and medical records
between 27th July and 18th August are the critical ones.

If it's true that the Athens test was positive but not revealed, then it
hints at the dark motive of WADA and the IOC, to set up the suspects and
nail them conclusively.

2006 prediction:
Pro cycling <=> pro wrestling.

that is a great call I almost would rather know it is all fake and fixed

It is fun knowing Thunder Lips will beat Rocky

Quoted message said:

2006 prediction:
Pro cycling <=> pro wrestling.

Stewart Fleming said:

If we count 60 days back from now, the window for transfusions to show
up in the test (working on 6-8 week sensitivity) covers both the
Olympics and the Tour. What happened between Athens and Vuleta is
irrelevant, so firm detail on Tyler's whereabouts and medical records
between 27th July and 18th August are the critical ones.

What happened between Athens and the Vuelta could be relevant if the test
results differ in the amounts of foreign cells detected (for example, if
the Vuelta results showed more foreign cells than the Athens test).