That would have been me, Thanks for the URL, Tom. I have pretty much decided in the benifit of half step gearing and decided to change my 24 - 39 - 53 chain rings to 24 - 42 - 50. with a 12 - 34 cassette this should work out much better than changing out the cassette , adjusting the rear der. based on hilly/flat riding location... As you said, in our dreams, shifting is always this way.
Regards Daniel dreaming and tinkering in Chester County, Pa
If you want true half stepping with a 50 outer ring for a 12-34 - you will needs something like a 47 middle ring which represents half of the ratio between the average jump on the cogsets.
Because I have a 20 inch drive wheel and an 11-30 cog, I set my chain ring rations to be 54/50 which is roughly the 1/2 the average step in the 11-30 cogset.
"Daniel Payne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
That would have been me, Thanks for the URL, Tom. I have pretty much decided in the benifit of half step gearing and decided to change my 24 - 39 - 53 chain rings to 24 - 42 - 50. with a 12 - 34 cassette this should work out much better than changing out the cassette , adjusting the rear der. based on hilly/flat riding location... As you said, in our dreams, shifting is always this way.
Regards Daniel dreaming and tinkering in Chester County, Pa
If you want true half stepping with a 50 outer ring for a 12-34 - you will needs something like a 47 middle ring which represents half of the ratio between the average jump on the cogsets.
Yes, i neglected to mention changing my middle ring to a larger one. Here is what i propose to do:
this is with a 559 wheel and a standard ramped and pinned middle ring. I think the jump off of the granny to the middle ring may be less than crisp, but my goal is to have a large range and still be able to have the closer choices for the rail trail or touring in the flat areas.
i intend to use the granny only to 'winch' myself up the steeper hills. i probably will not use the very crossed combinations and also will not go up more than six cogs on the granny.
How do you like your setup? do you use the half step when shifting or do you find that you don't use it that much? was it worth the part and time to install considering the use you get?
In the old days, the mid eighties in my case, it was called "half step with granny" Most freewheels were still only 5 or six cogs so the half step used the mid and big ring and all the cogs. The granny was the small chainring and the 2 lowest cogs, which IIRC were of the 24, 28 flavor. The rule of thumb was to use a jump of about 12%. It's a good scheme for finding the right gear so you can staay in your power band, but the novelty of up- down- front- back shift drill gets old. "Daniel Payne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On 24-Mar-2003, "Alpha Beta" <[email hidden]> wrote:
snip
Quoted message said:
i intend to use the granny only to 'winch' myself up the steeper hills. i probably will not use the very crossed combinations and also will not go up more than six cogs on the granny.
How do you like your setup? do you use the half step when shifting or do you find that you don't use it that much? was it worth the part and time to install considering the use you get?
Actually, the way I have my touring bike and my tandem set up is half-step plus granny. With an 8 speed cluster the tooth difference between the middle and large chain rings was 3 teeth. This lead to a shifting pattern of "is it a little change in the pedaling effort = shift the front","is there a larger change in the pedaling effort= shift the back". This works fine.
Tim Storey
-- This look left intentionally blank "harv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In the old days, the mid eighties in my case, it was called "half step
with
Quoted message said:
granny" Most freewheels were still only 5 or six cogs so the half step
used
Quoted message said:
the mid and big ring and all the cogs. The granny was the small chainring and the 2 lowest cogs, which IIRC were of the 24, 28 flavor. The rule of thumb was to use a jump of about 12%. It's a good scheme for finding the right gear so you can staay in your power band, but the novelty of up-
down-
Quoted message said:
front- back shift drill gets old. "Daniel Payne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On 24-Mar-2003, "Alpha Beta" <[email hidden]> wrote:
snip
Quoted message said:
i intend to use the granny only to 'winch' myself up the steeper hills. i probably will not use the very crossed combinations and also will not go up more than six cogs on the granny.
How do you like your setup? do you use the half step when shifting or do you find that you don't use it that much? was it worth the part and time to install considering the use you get?
Actually, the way I have my touring bike and my tandem set up is half-step plus granny. With an 8 speed cluster the tooth difference between the middle and large chain rings was 3 teeth. This lead to a shifting pattern of "is it a little change in the pedaling effort = shift the front","is there a larger change in the pedaling effort= shift the back". This works fine.
This is exactly what i am hoping to do, but i can see Harv's comment of the pattern getting old and not using it to its full potential. But if must be nice to have it available when you are heavily loaded and want to stay in your power band. I can see myself using it like you do Tim, Thanks, Daniel [ still waiting for the last part to arrive ]