Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Groupset comparisons - Campagnolo, FSA, Shimano and SRAM

Started by teachie99 · · Last activity · 11 posts · 3,886 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 August 2007
Last activity
15 August 2007
Original author
teachie99
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,886
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone seen a comparison of the different major groupset vendors' products? Googling 'groupset comparison' and a quick search on the threads here hasn't produced what I'm looking for.

    For example, I understand the Shimano groupset hierarchy but don't know which Campagnolo groupset should be compared against the 105 or Ultegra groupset. I guess weight and price are the most reliable indicators as durability is more subjective.

    Thanks.

  2. 1. Please do a search on this forum. This is a subject that comes up regularly.

    2. Check out the Sacred Site: http://www.campagnolo.com/

    3. The Campagnolo range, starting from Record (top of the line) is:

    Record
    Chorus --> Dura Ace
    Centaur --> Ultegra
    Veloce --> 105
    Mirage
    Xenon

    The 'pairing' that I propose can be argued - many would try to compare Dura Ace with Record, but given the latter's price and weight I feel (IMVHO) that Record is in a class of its own.

    Cannot comment on SRAM stuff as I am not very familiar, and FSA has yet to come out with a full groupset so it is not yet in the running. I would recommend going with Shimano or Campagnolo. Wait another season or two for SRAM (never be an early adopter!) and wait even longer on FSA (uncertain quality/reliability from what I have seen).

    Fire away!

  3. Powerful Pete said:

    1. Please do a search on this forum. This is a subject that comes up regularly.

    2. Check out the Sacred Site: campagnolo.comcampagnolo.com

    3. The Campagnolo range, starting from Record (top of the line) is:

    Record
    Chorus --> Dura Ace
    Centaur --> Ultegra
    Veloce --> 105
    Mirage
    Xenon

    The 'pairing' that I propose can be argued - many would try to compare Dura Ace with Record, but given the latter's price and weight I feel (IMVHO) that Record is in a class of its own.

    Cannot comment on SRAM stuff as I am not very familiar, and FSA has yet to come out with a full groupset so it is not yet in the running. I would recommend going with Shimano or Campagnolo. Wait another season or two for SRAM (never be an early adopter!) and wait even longer on FSA (uncertain quality/reliability from what I have seen).

    Fire away!

    Thanks for the info Mr Pete, that is the sort of guideline I was looking for. Should make it easier to compare bikes.

    Campagnolo provide weights for their components on the link you provided, do you know where to find weights for Shimano components? They don't provide that info on their website e.g. checking the 105 groupset on shimano.com.augroup.jsp

  4. It would be interesting to see how people would place SRAM's road groups on that chart. Where would the Red group sit?

  5. sogood said:

    It would be interesting to see how people would place SRAM's road groups on that chart. Where would the Red group sit?

    Well, since it ain't out yet, no one can say. It's definitely ugly.

  6. alienator said:

    Well, since it ain't out yet, no one can say. It's definitely ugly.


    As usual, you sounded like a true Campy aficionado! 😄

    Ok, how about Force? If Force gets equated with Chorus, then... :eek:

  7. teachie99 said:

    Thanks for the info Mr Pete, that is the sort of guideline I was looking for. Should make it easier to compare bikes.

    Campagnolo provide weights for their components on the link you provided, do you know where to find weights for Shimano components? They don't provide that info on their website e.g. checking the 105 groupset on shimano.com.augroup.jsp

    Honestly, I would not know. I do not go to that website often. :p I am sure you can come across weights and all that for Shimano groupsets with the assistance of Mr. Google.

  8. sogood said:

    As usual, you sounded like a true Campy aficionado! 😄

    Ok, how about Force? If Force gets equated with Chorus, then... :eek:

    Well, Alienator is right about the looks of the SRAM stuff.

    Cannot comment on the SRAM groups, as I stated earlier.

  9. Powerful Pete said:

    Well, Alienator is right about the looks of the SRAM stuff.

    Cannot comment on the SRAM groups, as I stated earlier.

    I'd say Force sits in at about the level of DA or Chorus. I've run all 3 and think the comparison is about right.

    Rival is mechanically the same as Force, just doesn't have the carbon bits. So it's hard to place. Probably approximately close to Ultegra/Centaur.

    --brett

  10. sideshow_bob said:

    I'd say Force sits in at about the level of DA or Chorus. I've run all 3 and think the comparison is about right.

    Rival is mechanically the same as Force, just doesn't have the carbon bits. So it's hard to place. Probably approximately close to Ultegra/Centaur.

    --brett

    I agree -- Force is marketed against Dura-Ace, Red supposed to be Record level, Rival marketed against Ultegra (with Dura-Ace level performance).

    Dan

  11. They all work. And you get what you pay for. Sounds like a broken record.

    Just choose!

    End of story.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.