General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

GREED Drives Pharma

Started by Mbumbotatum · · Last activity · 67 posts · 5,605 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 June 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
Mbumbotatum
Posts
67
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5,605
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 67
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The reason for the gross failure and irresponsibilility of
    drug manufacturers is GREED. Pharmaceutical companies loathe
    and despise simple compounds, even if they are the most
    effective for treating disease and illness. The reason is:
    because they can not patent it and hold the franchise for
    MAKING MONEY on it.

    Instead, when a simple herbal treatment is found (or
    "rediscovered"😉 that has been used for many centuries to
    treat illness, the big drug firms seek to chemically and
    synthetically produce the harsh chemical equivalent of the
    essence of that herb. Worse, they often knowingly seek to
    slightly alter (thus denaturing and actually poisoning) the
    original chemical component of the herb. The reason for
    doing this is that they now have a "singular" or slightly
    different drug that they can now patent. And, this gives
    them a virtual license to print money.

    So, with the big drug companies as they are, and with their
    incestuous tie-in to doctors who virtually push their pills
    for them, we will never have a medical community that
    actually works for the good of the patient and the consumer.
    Instead, we will constantly be saddled with super-greedy
    drug manufacturers who knowingly produce defective and even
    toxic products --and charging more than 100 times what the
    cost of them should actually be. This means that "modern
    science" is an utter and total failure as far as delivering
    medical care is concerned.

  2. "MbumboTatum" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for the gross failure and
    irresponsibilility of drug


    manufacturers

    Quoted message said:

    is GREED. Pharmaceutical companies loathe and despise
    simple compounds,


    even if

    Quoted message said:

    they are the most effective for treating disease and
    illness. The reason


    is:

    Quoted message said:

    because they can not patent it and hold the franchise for
    MAKING MONEY on


    it.

    Greed is good. It is a strong motitivator that has
    caused many good inventions. There has never been one
    invention that did not involve greed in terms of money
    or personal benefits.

    Quoted message said:


    Instead, when a simple herbal treatment is found (or
    "rediscovered"😉 that


    has

    Quoted message said:

    been used for many centuries to treat illness, the big
    drug firms seek to chemically and synthetically produce
    the harsh chemical equivalent of the essence of that herb.
    Worse, they often knowingly seek to slightly alter


    (thus

    Quoted message said:

    denaturing and actually poisoning) the original chemical
    component of the


    herb.

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for doing this is that they now have a
    "singular" or slightly different drug that they can now
    patent. And, this gives them a virtual


    license

    Quoted message said:

    to print money.

    So, with the big drug companies as they are, and with
    their incestuous


    tie-in

    Quoted message said:

    to doctors who virtually push their pills for them, we
    will never have a medical community that actually works
    for the good of the patient and the

    The medical community doesn't work for the good of the
    patient?

    Quoted message said:

    consumer. Instead, we will constantly be saddled with super-
    greedy drug manufacturers who knowingly produce defective
    and even toxic


    products --and

    Quoted message said:

    charging more than 100 times what the cost of them should
    actually be.


    This

    Quoted message said:

    means that "modern science" is an utter and total failure
    as far as


    delivering

    Quoted message said:

    medical care is concerned.

    Now it's modern science that is a total failure. So what is
    the answer to all these observations? Go to witch doctors
    and never go to anybody who uses modern science because they
    are all corrupt. You clowns are the first to use
    pseudoscience in trying to sale your own herbal remedies.

  3. [email hidden] (MbumboTatum) wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for the gross failure and irresponsibilility of
    drug manufacturers is GREED.

    Failure? What failure? The drug companies are in business to
    make money, and they're very, very successful at it.

    Quoted message said:

    Pharmaceutical companies loathe and despise simple
    compounds, even if they are the most effective for
    treating disease and illness. The reason is: because
    they can not patent it and hold the franchise for MAKING
    MONEY on it.

    Correct. They are in business, and making money is what
    they're supposed to do.

    Quoted message said:

    Instead, when a simple herbal treatment is found (or
    "rediscovered"😉 that has been used for many centuries to
    treat illness, the big drug firms seek to chemically and
    synthetically produce the harsh chemical equivalent of the
    essence of that herb. Worse, they often knowingly seek to
    slightly alter (thus denaturing and actually poisoning)
    the original chemical component of the herb. The reason
    for doing this is that they now have a "singular" or
    slightly different drug that they can now patent. And,
    this gives them a virtual license to print money.

    So, with the big drug companies as they are, and with
    their incestuous tie-in to doctors who virtually push
    their pills for them, we will never have a medical
    community that actually works for the good of the patient
    and the consumer. Instead, we will constantly be saddled
    with super-greedy drug manufacturers who knowingly produce
    defective and even toxic products --and charging more than
    100 times what the cost of them should actually be. This
    means that "modern science" is an utter and total failure
    as far as delivering medical care is concerned.

    Modern science does not deliver medical care. Doctors do.
    You rant at the drug companies but say nothing about the
    doctors? Where are your priorities?

    Chakolate

    --
    I think on-stage nudity is disgusting, shameful and damaging
    to all things American. But if I were 22 with a great body,
    it would be artistic, tasteful, patriotic and a progressive
    religious experience. --Shelley Winters

  4. "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "MbumboTatum" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for the gross failure and irresponsibilility
    of drug


    manufacturers

    Quoted message said:

    is GREED. Pharmaceutical companies loathe and despise
    simple compounds,


    even if

    Quoted message said:

    they are the most effective for treating disease and
    illness. The reason


    is:

    Quoted message said:

    because they can not patent it and hold the franchise
    for MAKING MONEY on


    it.

    Greed is good. It is a strong motitivator that has caused
    many good inventions. There has never been one invention
    that did not involve greed in terms of money or personal
    benefits.

    Greed is good when balanced with a social conscience. When
    left completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth
    policy that is un-sustainable and in this case is sickening
    and killing millions.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Instead, when a simple herbal treatment is found (or
    "rediscovered"😉 that


    has

    Quoted message said:

    been used for many centuries to treat illness, the big
    drug firms seek to chemically and synthetically produce
    the harsh chemical equivalent of the essence of that
    herb. Worse, they often knowingly seek to slightly alter


    (thus

    Quoted message said:

    denaturing and actually poisoning) the original chemical
    component of the


    herb.

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for doing this is that they now have a
    "singular" or slightly different drug that they can now
    patent. And, this gives them a virtual


    license

    Quoted message said:

    to print money.

    So, with the big drug companies as they are, and with
    their incestuous


    tie-in

    Quoted message said:

    to doctors who virtually push their pills for them, we
    will never have a medical community that actually works
    for the good of the patient and the

    The medical community doesn't work for the good of the
    patient?

    Nope. Certainly not every medical practitioner. A few maybe,
    and I feel I'm being generous to them by saying that.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    consumer. Instead, we will constantly be saddled with
    super-greedy drug manufacturers who knowingly produce
    defective and even toxic


    products --and

    Quoted message said:

    charging more than 100 times what the cost of them
    should actually be.


    This

    Quoted message said:

    means that "modern science" is an utter and total
    failure as far as


    delivering

    Quoted message said:

    medical care is concerned.

    Now it's modern science that is a total failure. So what
    is the answer to all these observations? Go to witch
    doctors and never go to anybody who uses modern science
    because they are all corrupt. You clowns are the first to
    use pseudoscience in trying to sale your own herbal
    remedies.

    Modern nutritional and medical science is a joke and a
    failure as an actual science. They are worse than witch
    doctors because they will treat you in a way that will
    profit their bottom-line with little regard to actually
    dealing and curing the condition. What we do here is ferret
    out the truth in medicine and health. We are as qualified
    to do that as any biased, pharma-paid-university-trained
    doctor practicing today. The biggest pseudo-science today
    is in the food and health fields and these pseudo-
    scientists are raking in millions from these industries. It
    is truly tragic.

    You want to leave your and your families health up to
    these clowns in the employ of the food and pharma
    industries, go for it, knock yorself out, join the
    lemmings. I, myself, belive that we need to be a bit more
    cynical about their motives and carefully research things
    first so we can make informed decisions about the food we
    eat and the medicines we take.

    TC

  5. "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "MbumboTatum" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for the gross failure and irresponsibilility
    of drug


    manufacturers

    Quoted message said:

    is GREED. Pharmaceutical companies loathe and despise
    simple compounds,


    even if

    Quoted message said:

    they are the most effective for treating disease and
    illness. The reason


    is:

    Quoted message said:

    because they can not patent it and hold the franchise
    for MAKING MONEY


    on

    Quoted message said:

    it.

    Greed is good. It is a strong motitivator that has caused
    many good inventions. There has never been one invention
    that did not involve greed


    in

    Quoted message said:

    terms of money or personal benefits.

    MBumboTatum is a bit of a troll. This was posted for a
    reaction. And my reaction is found below.

    The profit motive is useful not good. And Greed is the
    profit motive run amok. There is such thing as a fair profit
    as there is such a thing as price gouging. Part of the
    failing of the current system is that it over-looks simpler
    and safer medical useful substances in favor of patentable
    substances. The drug companies often spend their resources
    making copy cat drugs of little or no merit; rather, than
    truly innovating. Perhaps the pharmaceutical industry
    corporations need to be broken up like Bell telephone was.
    There need to be price controls and can the pay structures
    within the resulting corporation need to
    dicated................... Fear not it wouldn't happen. The
    corporations are now transnational and often foreign
    based...........welcome to the brave new world of the world
    wide banana republic.

    Power come from the point of a ............... as the banana
    republican Texas Oil industry representive GWB knows so
    well...............
    ....................................William A. Noyes

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    Instead, when a simple herbal treatment is found (or
    "rediscovered"😉


    that

    Quoted message said:

    has

    Quoted message said:

    been used for many centuries to treat illness, the big
    drug firms seek


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    chemically and synthetically produce the harsh chemical
    equivalent of


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    essence of that herb. Worse, they often knowingly seek
    to slightly alter


    (thus

    Quoted message said:

    denaturing and actually poisoning) the original chemical
    component of


    the

    Quoted message said:

    herb.

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for doing this is that they now have a
    "singular" or slightly different drug that they can now
    patent. And, this gives them a virtual


    license

    Quoted message said:

    to print money.

    So, with the big drug companies as they are, and with
    their incestuous


    tie-in

    Quoted message said:

    to doctors who virtually push their pills for them, we
    will never have a medical community that actually works
    for the good of the patient and


    the

    Quoted message said:


    The medical community doesn't work for the good of the
    patient?

    Quoted message said:

    consumer. Instead, we will constantly be saddled with
    super-greedy drug manufacturers who knowingly produce
    defective and even toxic


    products --and

    Quoted message said:

    charging more than 100 times what the cost of them
    should actually be.


    This

    Quoted message said:

    means that "modern science" is an utter and total
    failure as far as


    delivering

    Quoted message said:

    medical care is concerned.

    Now it's modern science that is a total failure. So what
    is the answer to all these observations? Go to witch
    doctors and never go to anybody who uses modern science
    because they are all corrupt. You clowns are the first to
    use pseudoscience in trying to sale your own herbal
    remedies.

  6. On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:39:47 -0700, "Robert" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    snip

    Quoted message said:

    Greed is good. It is a strong motitivator that has caused
    many good inventions. There has never been one invention
    that did not involve greed in terms of money or personal
    benefits.

    Horrifically incorrect. Seeking a reasonable return on
    investment is not necessarily bad--but Greed is an excessive
    version of that which has lethal consequences.

    These consequences have been felt from the basic science
    research level (high royalty payments necessary for using
    assays or reagents resulting in limiting in vitro research)
    to the global economy (the obfuscation by the United States
    and the pharmaceutical industry in trade deals from the WTO
    Doha agreement to cases such as Glaxo Smith Kline blocking
    access to generic Duovir in Ghana), with the result of a
    global form of economic genocide. Not just high prices
    destabilizing healthcare throughout the world and strongly
    contributing to 43 million US citizens having no health
    insurance and many more being underinsured, but in the
    outright interference of access to life-saving medications
    result in horrible suffering and death.

    Greed is NOT good. That is the lexicon of evil that results
    in so much of the corruption we face in the world today.
    From Glaxo to Bush to Halliburton to the bodies of children
    strewn from Baghdad to Bangkok to Bulawayo.

    A balance must be struck. Otherwise the horrific global
    divide between rich and poor only widens and we face even
    more dire consequences, as if the disasters of today are not
    adequate enough indictment of a system out of control. Too
    many of these disasters, of this suffering and death, is of
    our own species' doing and could be dramatically resolved
    for the better if we only put our minds and hearts to it.

    George M. Carter

  7. "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > Greed
    is good when balanced with a social conscience. When left

    Quoted message said:

    completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth policy
    that is un-sustainable and in this case is sickening and
    killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of greed
    but greed is part of human nature and you can't eliminate it
    simply because you don't like it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The medical community doesn't work for the good of the
    patient?

    Nope. Certainly not every medical practitioner. A few
    maybe, and I feel I'm being generous to them by
    saying that.

    Then why go to one and why are you so concerned about them?

    Quoted message said:


    Modern nutritional and medical science is a joke and a
    failure as an actual science. They are worse than witch
    doctors because they will treat you in a way that will
    profit their bottom-line with little regard to actually
    dealing and curing the condition. What we do here is
    ferret out the truth in medicine and health. We are as
    qualified to do that as any biased, pharma-paid-university-
    trained doctor practicing today. The biggest pseudo-
    science today is in the food and health fields and these
    pseudo-scientists are raking in millions from these
    industries. It is truly tragic.

    People are adults and can do what they wish to and go see
    who the want to see. They can go anywhere they want to as it
    is a free country. Supply and demand says that if you have a
    better system and it is cheap then they will go. Build it
    and they will come. So what system are you saying they
    should go to instead of the conventional health systems. You
    have good arguements about how rotten the present system is
    so what is your alternative the people are running to?

    Quoted message said:


    You want to leave your and your families health up to
    these clowns in the employ of the food and pharma
    industries, go for it, knock yorself out, join the
    lemmings. I, myself, belive that we need to be a bit more
    cynical about their motives and carefully research things
    first so we can make informed decisions about the food we
    eat and the medicines we take.

    TC


    There is no such thing as an impartial researcher or neutral
    unbiased observer. All research is biased so exactly what
    are you researching. You don't need research to follow your
    own prejudice. You can have two conflicting research
    articles and follow anyone you want to. You can't live up to
    your own standards as absolute truth does not exist, only
    temporary relative truths that are time dependent.

  8. "William A. Noyes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "MbumboTatum" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:20040616033239.05570.00000072@mb-
    m14.wmconnect.com...

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for the gross failure and
    irresponsibilility of drug


    manufacturers

    Quoted message said:

    is GREED. Pharmaceutical companies loathe and despise
    simple


    compounds,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    even if

    Quoted message said:

    they are the most effective for treating disease and
    illness. The


    reason

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    is:

    Quoted message said:

    because they can not patent it and hold the franchise
    for MAKING MONEY


    on

    Quoted message said:

    it.

    Greed is good. It is a strong motitivator that has
    caused many good inventions. There has never been one
    invention that did not involve


    greed

    Quoted message said:

    in

    Quoted message said:

    terms of money or personal benefits.

    MBumboTatum is a bit of a troll. This was posted for a
    reaction. And my reaction is found below.

    The profit motive is useful not good. And Greed is the
    profit motive run amok. There is such thing as a fair
    profit as there is such a thing as price gouging. Part of
    the failing of the current system is that it over-looks
    simpler and safer medical useful substances in favor of
    patentable substances.


    That is true of the current system that one is not obliged
    to be a part of. You can refuse any medication you want to.
    You can go to anybody you please. I really don't understand
    the logic of going into a Italian restaurant and demanding
    French food and then telling the manager that he should
    change his menu. If you are sick you need strong
    medications. If you want to prevent disease you can go
    holistic all the way but as soon as you get sick then the
    ball game is over. You are admitting defeat by going into
    the doctor. If you have an infection he will give you an
    antibiotic and not ask you to eat a moldy bread with
    penicillium. Third world countries have always used simpler
    meds and herbs but you are talking apples and oranges. It
    is the price gouging that pays for the research to find
    patentable substances. Who has the money to fund research
    involving non-patentabe substances? Nobody, so in effect
    you want research halted. Without greed all research will
    be halted.

    The drug companies often spend their

    Quoted message said:

    resources making copy cat drugs of little or no merit;
    rather, than truly innovating. Perhaps the pharmaceutical
    industry corporations need to be broken up like Bell
    telephone was. There need to be price controls and can the
    pay structures within the resulting corporation

    Right after they start gas price control and electricity and
    food price control.

  9. "GMCarter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:39:47 -0700, "Robert"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    snip

    Quoted message said:

    Greed is good. It is a strong motitivator that has caused
    many good inventions. There has never been one invention
    that did not involve greed


    in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    terms of money or personal benefits.

    Horrifically incorrect. Seeking a reasonable return on
    investment is not necessarily bad--but Greed is an
    excessive version of that which has lethal consequences.


    What is reasonable profit to one is greed to another so your
    definition adds little. The actual profit margin does not
    define greed. Greed is an intent and not dependent on the
    sum. If I have the intent on inventing something with the
    goal of making millions and only in reality make or lose
    very little the motivator was still greed. Greed was furthur
    institutionalized via the patent law or through damage
    lawsuits. If a new drug kills somebody, lethal consequences,
    then the family gets money from the company. No money can
    bring back anybody so it is simply done for the money. The
    laywer will find the biggest pocket to get payed.

    Quoted message said:


    These consequences have been felt from the basic science
    research level (high royalty payments necessary for using
    assays or reagents resulting in limiting in vitro
    research)


    No, not limiting in vitro research, drug companies have
    money to spend for research. Single small guy labs don't
    have the money to do adequate research. You want to make
    everybody poor in getting rid of patents and limiting
    profits to the point where everybody is limited in doing any
    research. Pretty backward thinking, lets make everybody
    equal. to the global economy (the

    Quoted message said:

    obfuscation by the United States and the pharmaceutical
    industry in trade deals from the WTO Doha agreement to
    cases such as Glaxo Smith Kline blocking access to generic
    Duovir in Ghana), with the result of a global form of
    economic genocide. Not just high prices destabilizing
    healthcare throughout the world and strongly contributing
    to 43 million US citizens having no health insurance and
    many more being underinsured, but in the outright
    interference of access to life-saving medications result
    in horrible suffering and death.

    What life-saving medications? You want to get rid of patents
    on moral grounds? Is it moral that you will deprive the
    future funding of new drugs that can prevent horrible
    suffering and death. You mention third world countries where
    simpler meds are an accepted way to treat disease and you
    are angered that they don't have access to newer drugs?

    Quoted message said:

    Greed is NOT good. That is the lexicon of evil that
    results in so much of the corruption we face in the world
    today. From Glaxo to Bush to Halliburton to the bodies of
    children strewn from Baghdad to Bangkok to Bulawayo.


    Duovir was a drug developed by a greedy drug company. It is
    a product of greed and you want that drug for Ghana.
    Without the greed motive that drug would not have been
    developed because it was funded by the previous greed
    derived patents. Ghana should use non greed derived morally
    pure therapies such as basic herbs and basic substances
    that are quite good.

    Quoted message said:


    A balance must be struck. Otherwise the horrific global
    divide between rich and poor only widens and we face even
    more dire consequences, as if the disasters of today are
    not adequate enough indictment of a system out of control.
    Too many of these disasters, of this suffering and death,
    is of our own species' doing and could be dramatically
    resolved for the better if we only put our minds and
    hearts to it.

    George M. Carter


    You are a philosopher that doesn't run any business.

  10. On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:17:40 -0700, "Robert" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > Greed
    is good when balanced with a social conscience. When left

    Quoted message said:

    completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth policy
    that is un-sustainable and in this case is sickening and
    killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of greed
    but greed is part of human nature and you can't eliminate
    it simply because you don't like it.

    This is just a lie that's been foisted on us. There is a BIG
    difference between greed -- outright avarice, use of money
    as a tool of power, etc. -- and the desire to have housing,
    shelter, food, health care. Even buddhist teaching embraces
    this, suggesting a middle way between the privation of an
    ascetic and the hoarding piggishness of people like Bush.

    Muslims have a saying that I hope I don't too much injustice
    to that goes something like we should have enough to walk
    through the day.

    There are balances. Greed is NOT good. Greed is aberration
    that causes suffering.

    Doing good -- discovering a new drug--or simply WORKING on
    such discovery is not greed. Being rewarded adequately for
    such a discovery is not greed. Taking excessive advantage of
    anti-competitive patent law to squeeze the last dime out of
    people who need the product to stay alive or let them suffer
    and die if they cannot afford it IS greed. Explain to me how
    that is good?

    George M. Carter

  11. "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > Greed
    is good when balanced with a social conscience. When left

    Quoted message said:

    completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth policy
    that is un-sustainable and in this case is sickening and
    killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of greed
    but greed is part of human nature and you can't eliminate
    it simply because you don't like it.

    The *only* good greed is the one that is balanced with a
    social concience.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The medical community doesn't work for the good of the
    patient?

    Nope. Certainly not every medical practitioner. A few
    maybe, and I feel I'm being generous to them by
    saying that.

    Then why go to one and why are you so concerned
    about them?

    I go and get an opinion. I make the last decision regarding
    treatment. I look to them as advisors or a source of
    necessary medication. I decide if it is necessary.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Modern nutritional and medical science is a joke and a
    failure as an actual science. They are worse than witch
    doctors because they will treat you in a way that will
    profit their bottom-line with little regard to actually
    dealing and curing the condition. What we do here is
    ferret out the truth in medicine and health. We are as
    qualified to do that as any biased, pharma-paid-university-
    trained doctor practicing today. The biggest pseudo-
    science today is in the food and health fields and these
    pseudo-scientists are raking in millions from these
    industries. It is truly tragic.

    People are adults and can do what they wish to and go see
    who the want to see. They can go anywhere they want to as
    it is a free country. Supply and demand says that if you
    have a better system and it is cheap then they will go.
    Build it and they will come. So what system are you saying
    they should go to instead of the conventional health
    systems. You have good arguements about how rotten the
    present system is so what is your alternative the people
    are running to?

    There is the problem in a nutshell. We cannot depend on our
    only source of medical care to do what we expect of them,
    that is provide actual working treatments with the minimal
    amount of invasive drugs or procedures. We cannot trust them
    to do what they are expected to do. Where does that leave
    us? Alone to figure things out on our own. There is no
    alternative except to educate ourselves. Many who fail to
    see this will suffer at the hand of the greedy [censored].

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    You want to leave your and your families health up to
    these clowns in the employ of the food and pharma
    industries, go for it, knock yorself out, join the
    lemmings. I, myself, belive that we need to be a bit
    more cynical about their motives and carefully research
    things first so we can make informed decisions about the
    food we eat and the medicines we take.

    TC


    There is no such thing as an impartial researcher or
    neutral unbiased observer. All research is biased so
    exactly what are you researching. You don't need research
    to follow your own prejudice. You can have two conflicting
    research articles and follow anyone you want to. You can't
    live up to your own standards as absolute truth does not
    exist, only temporary relative truths that are time
    dependent.

    Of course there is no completely impartial researcher in the
    general sense. We all hold certain beliefs and we will try
    to confirm these beliefs thru research. But we should
    understand the corruption inherent in having 70% of our
    scientists and researchers going into research projects with
    a specific financially/funding motivated goal in mind. We
    should have checks and balances in place to identify when
    these researchers fudge the numbers, and when they get
    caught fudging the numbers they should be appropriately
    flogged publicly.

    Researchers should have to declare their financial interests
    up front and we will take that into account when we throw
    their research in the waste basket. Doctors should take
    nothing from pharmaceutical reps for fear of being
    accordingly tainted by what amounts to a bribe. Universities
    should clearly state its industry funding and not allow it
    to dictate their curriculums. Non-profit organizations
    should avoid, at all costs, taking money from industry
    sources, because to do so taints them.

    There is nothing wrong with free enterprise as long as we
    all understand the concepts of corruption, conflict of
    interest, professional integrity and independence. And as
    long as we are clear as to the financial interest
    involved for each and every participant in the medical
    and research fields.

    Unfettered, unchecked and hidden from public scrutiny, greed
    destroys the basic integrity of science. The perfect example
    of this is the sciences of nutrition and drugs.

    TC

  12. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    The profit motive is useful not good. And Greed is the
    profit motive run amok. There is such thing as a fair
    profit as there is such a thing as price gouging. Part
    of the failing of the current system is that it over-
    looks simpler and safer medical useful substances in
    favor of patentable substances.

    Quoted message said:

    That is true of the current system that one is not obliged
    to be a part


    of.

    Quoted message said:

    You can refuse any medication you want to.

    I am not talking about refusing meds? Anyway, the drug
    companies have been withholding research results that don't
    favor their drugs. See recent article about proposed reforms
    in publishing research results by the AMA. The Docs want to
    see the null and negative results for research that the drug
    companies have deep sixed.

    Quoted message said:

    You can go to anybody you please. I really don't
    understand the logic of going into a Italian restaurant
    and demanding French food and then telling the manager
    that he should change his menu.

    Well, I'd like a self serve salad bar for many non-addictive
    meds. So you admit the current system can't provide good
    service so don't ask for it?

    Quoted message said:

    If you are sick you need strong medications.

    Who says I've anything against strong meds? I'd just like a
    greater portion of generic and off-patent meds.

    I was referring to implementing the use inositol versus
    SSRI meds, CoQ-10 and carnitine in heart conditions,
    arginine and carnitine for reduced male potency, vitamin D
    at high levels to help prevent the following: type-1
    diabetes, prostate cancer, breast cancer, autoimmune
    disorders, use of tetracycline-like meds to reduce
    inflammation, estriol versus just estrone and E2,
    testosterone gel versus testosterone patches etc.

    Quoted message said:

    If you want to prevent disease you can go holistic all the
    way but as soon as you get sick then the ball game is
    over. You are admitting defeat by going into the doctor.
    If you have an infection he will give you an antibiotic
    and not ask you to eat a moldy bread with penicillium.

    Don't paint me as a Luddite. I am for antibiotics when
    needed.

    Quoted message said:

    Third world countries have always used simpler meds and
    herbs but you are talking apples and oranges.

    I wasn't talking about the third world. Why are you?
    Worried about their generic industry cutting into your
    employer's profits?

    Quoted message said:

    It is the price gouging that pays for the research to find
    patentable substances.

    Naw. It pays for the drug corporation CEO multi-million drug
    pay packages plus Jiggles his very personal assistent. I say
    cut the over head, keep the scientists.

    Quoted message said:

    Who has the money to fund research involving non-patentabe
    substances? Nobody, so in effect you want research halted.

    Castrate the political power of the big drug corporations,
    then replace them with an admixture of public funded
    research organizations with publicly supported manufacturing
    and have parallel track of limited size corporations that
    research drugs in which the reward go in large measure to
    the scientists. It is about a balancing act in the private
    sector were there needs to be enough profits to pay off the
    research, cover risk, have long enough of a patent to get a
    good profit and enough reward that a good team will seek
    another bit of the apple. Without seeing all costs involved
    generating a new drug with the associated manufacturing
    facilities, we can only argue.

    Quoted message said:

    Without greed all research will be halted.

    Nonsense. One just needs a different social construct in
    the form of a mechanism to generate research, production,
    and rewards..

    Quoted message said:


    The drug companies often spend their

    Quoted message said:

    resources making copy cat drugs of little or no merit;
    rather, than truly innovating. Perhaps the
    pharmaceutical industry corporations need to be broken
    up like Bell telephone was. There need to be price
    controls and can the pay structures within the resulting
    corporation

    Right after they start gas price control and electricity
    and food price control.

    Price controls don't have to be on the moron level of
    dicated finished goods prices; rather, there somewhat more
    subtle methods used for the control of prices as implemented
    in the U.S.A.

    Public power is great and quite superior to private
    electricial power companies. I use public power and I've met
    the board members, men giving back to the community.

    Look what happened in Calfornia and Oregon with private
    electrical power.... what a disaster, a secret power cartel
    of sorts........greed in action to no good purpose. Can you
    say Enron.

    And food price controls, well, the USA has those if you've
    haven't noticed. Why do you think the milk prices just went
    up a little? Why do you think the commodiities such milk,
    peanuts, soy, corn, and wheat are cheap? It is because
    commodity price supports even out the gyrations of the
    market driven distribution system that is impelled by
    forces of fear, greed, supply, and demand. Price supports
    are a very clever mechanism that controls prices and
    provide ample supply.

    And the current war is about oil in part and is an indirect
    subsidy of the oil commodity. Thus as such is an oil price
    "control", it surely controls oil prices in the longer term
    by the mechanism of fear. Not always direct fear rather more
    often indirect fear......it is really rather brillant if
    somewhat risky.

    Anyway, I said that what is needed; I didn't say it was
    about to happen.

    It is a Dark Water world................
    ..........................William A. Noyes

    Meta Communication Postscript: this thread is wandering off
    from the science into the realm of politics. I prefer the
    biochemistry to the politics.

  13. On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:03:26 -0700, "Robert" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    What is reasonable profit to one is greed to another so
    your definition adds little. The actual profit margin
    does not define greed. Greed is an intent and not
    dependent on the sum.

    LOL. I disagree somewhat. Again, you justify horrific
    behavior by muddying the waters.

    Best of luck in your journey!

    George M. Carter

    ** Dalai Lama Quote of the Week

    There are two kinds of food- food for mental hunger and food
    for physical hunger. Thus a combination of these two-
    material progress and spiritual development is the most
    practical thing. I think that many Americans, particularly
    young Americans, realize that material progress alone is not
    the full answer for human life. Right now all of the Eastern
    nations are trying to copy Western technology. We Easterners
    such as Tibetans, like myself, look to Western technology
    feeling that once we develop material progress, our people
    can reach some sort of permanent happiness. But when I come
    to Europe or North America, I see that underneath the
    beautiful surface there is still unhappiness, mental unrest,
    and restlessness. This shows that material progress alone is
    not the full answer for human beings.

    -- His Holiness the Dalai Lama, from The Dalai Lama, A
    Policy of Kindness, published by Snow Lion Publications.

  14. "GMCarter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Robert said:


    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >
    Greed is good when balanced with a social conscience.
    When left

    Quoted message said:

    completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth
    policy that is un-sustainable and in this case is
    sickening and killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of greed
    but greed is


    part

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of human nature and you can't eliminate it simply because
    you don't like


    it.

    Quoted message said:


    This is just a lie that's been foisted on us. There is a
    BIG difference between greed -- outright avarice, use of
    money as a tool of power, etc. -- and the desire to have
    housing, shelter, food, health care. Even buddhist
    teaching embraces this, suggesting a middle way between
    the privation of an ascetic and the hoarding piggishness
    of people like Bush.

    You mention the buddhist, did you know that you must give
    food offering to the monks for them to eat. In so doing you
    yourself benefit from it. It is a form of greed in the
    giving and in the taking. You give so you will directly
    benefit. Money is a tool that is exchanged and with it comes
    power. Give money to the poor and they receive the power.
    Give money to a homeless person and he buys a bottle of rum.
    Giver a house or more power and he buys more drugs. A
    homeless person will kill another over his park bench. Greed
    is part of human nature and it has been institutionalized.
    You went to school so you could make more money and success
    is pure greed.

    Quoted message said:


    Muslims have a saying that I hope I don't too much
    injustice to that goes something like we should have
    enough to walk through the day.

    There are balances. Greed is NOT good. Greed is aberration
    that causes suffering.


    You don't understand greed then as it is the intentiional
    act of concentrating power. If you better yourself in any
    way then it is a greedful act. If you apply for a job in
    which there are a thousand applicants and you get the job
    then it is a greedful act to accept it.

    Quoted message said:


    Doing good -- discovering a new drug--or simply WORKING on
    such discovery is not greed. Being rewarded adequately for
    such a discovery is not greed. Taking excessive advantage
    of anti-competitive patent law to squeeze the last dime
    out of people who need the product to stay alive or let
    them suffer and die if they cannot afford it IS greed.
    Explain to me how that is good?

    George M. Carter


    You are spending money trying to discover a new drug when
    you could give it to the poor is greed. You call it a reward
    but in fact it is greed. Taking a look at patent laws and
    using money to be spent on better drugs is greed indeed but
    is good. If a person is harmed by these new drugs and they
    get a lawyer and win millions of money then that is pure
    greed. If the company is bankrupted by the loss then they
    can no longer find new drugs. Competing forms of greed.
    9/11 terrorist act in New York city, family member win
    billions of dollars in the settlement over airlines. The
    money won't bring their love ones back so they can live
    happier with millions now. Pure greed.

  15. "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >
    Greed is good when balanced with a social conscience.
    When left

    Quoted message said:

    completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth
    policy that is un-sustainable and in this case is
    sickening and killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of
    greed but greed is


    part

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of human nature and you can't eliminate it simply
    because you don't like


    it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The *only* good greed is the one that is balanced with a
    social concience.

    No, social concience has institutionalized greed to make it
    accepted. I spill a cup of hot coffee on myself and blame it
    on the store I bought it at and win millions of dollares. It
    is legal and accepted by society. People give to charieties
    because it is tax deductable. You have people fighting over
    funds for research. The HIV people vs the cancer people and
    the men's health issues vs the women's health issues. Is it
    noble to support AID's research when funding was taken out
    of cancer research? You have competing moralities ie
    competing greed.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > The medical community doesn't work for the good of
    > the patient?
    >

    Nope. Certainly not every medical practitioner. A few
    maybe, and I feel I'm being generous to them by saying
    that.

    Then why go to one and why are you so concerned
    about them?

    I go and get an opinion. I make the last decision
    regarding treatment. I look to them as advisors or a
    source of necessary medication. I decide if it is
    necessary.


    How can you get an independent medical opinion from doctors
    who are bought buy the drug companies and read articles
    written by those same companies? The answer is that it has
    been going on for many years and you simply find somebody
    you can trust until he does something that is untrustworthy.

    Quoted message said:

    There is the problem in a nutshell. We cannot depend on
    our only source of medical care to do what we expect of
    them, that is provide actual working treatments with the
    minimal amount of invasive drugs or procedures. We cannot
    trust them to do what they are expected to do.

    We have and we do. People were dying with AIDS within
    months. They, people with HIV, protested and wanted
    changes handcuffing the drug companies. Fast track
    examptions were passed and many newer drugs were developed
    and put in use. This was unprecedented and completely
    opposite of what people here are asking for. They made it
    easier on the drug companies for patent money making and
    lawsuits and toxicity etc. Bottom line people are living
    with HIV for years now. Clamp down on everybody and you
    get no change for years and years.

    Quoted message said:

    Where does that leave us? Alone to figure things out on
    our own. There is no alternative except to educate
    ourselves. Many who fail to see this will suffer at the
    hand of the greedy [censored].

    Entilement is another form of greed. I am entiled to this or
    not and if one person has something then I am entiled to it
    aswell. Greedy [censored] are out to make money so what
    entiles you to something they have for free? What entiles
    you to think that you deserve anything? You have people with
    leprosy going to a remote village doctor in Africa for
    treatment and I don't see that person asking the doctor
    about drug company connections.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    There is no such thing as an impartial researcher or
    neutral unbiased observer. All research is biased so
    exactly what are you researching.


    You

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't need research to follow your own prejudice. You
    can have two conflicting research articles and follow
    anyone you want to. You can't


    live

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    up to your own standards as absolute truth does not
    exist, only


    temporary

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    relative truths that are time dependent.

    Of course there is no completely impartial researcher in
    the general sense. We all hold certain beliefs and we will
    try to confirm these beliefs thru research. But we should
    understand the corruption inherent in having 70% of our
    scientists and researchers going into research projects
    with a specific financially/funding motivated goal

    Eliminate 70% of all research and you lost a century. You
    really don't believe in research as it has always been
    sponsored by other individuals.

    Quoted message said:

    in mind. We should have checks and balances in place to
    identify when these researchers fudge the numbers, and
    when they get caught fudging the numbers they should be
    appropriately flogged publicly.


    It is too costly to do so and a waste of time. The FDA, one
    this rich country does not have the money. If the finding
    are valid and it works then others will prosper through
    making money. People take drugs for conditions to help them
    out and if it doesn't help them out then they don't take
    them. Fudging numbers is common but if its an important
    study it will be found out later with follow-up studies.

    Quoted message said:


    Researchers should have to declare their financial
    interests up front and we will take that into account when
    we throw their research in the waste basket. Doctors
    should take nothing from pharmaceutical reps for fear of
    being accordingly tainted by what amounts to a bribe.


    They did a study about how many people cheat on their income
    tax returns. Did you know you are not suppose to do that?

    Quoted message said:

    Universities should clearly state its industry funding and
    not allow it to dictate their curriculums. Non-profit
    organizations should avoid, at all costs, taking money
    from industry sources, because to do so taints them.

    That is really childish and I do not know of any Non-profit
    organization that will not take money from industry. You are
    way off there.

    Quoted message said:


    There is nothing wrong with free enterprise as long as we
    all understand the concepts of corruption, conflict of
    interest, professional integrity and independence. And as
    long as we are clear as to the financial interest
    involved for each and every participant in the medical
    and research fields.

    Unfettered, unchecked and hidden from public scrutiny,
    greed destroys the basic integrity of science. The perfect
    example of this is the sciences of nutrition and drugs.

    TC

  16. "William A. Noyes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    The profit motive is useful not good. And Greed is the
    profit motive run amok. There is such thing as a fair
    profit as there is such a thing as price gouging. Part
    of the failing of the current system is that it over-
    looks simpler and safer medical useful substances in
    favor of patentable substances.

    Quoted message said:

    That is true of the current system that one is not
    obliged to be a part


    of.

    Quoted message said:

    You can refuse any medication you want to.

    I am not talking about refusing meds? Anyway, the drug
    companies have been withholding research results that
    don't favor their drugs. See recent article about proposed
    reforms in publishing research results by the AMA. The
    Docs want to see the null and negative results for
    research that the drug companies have deep sixed.

    I agree it is done all the time but what right do you have
    to see private funded research? If the Docs prevail then
    you have checks and balances then don't you? If they don't
    prevail then you have the collective rights of companies
    known as work product confidentiality. Doctors see
    patients and can judge for themselves whether the drug is
    working or not. Is the goal here to make it impossible to
    develop a safe drug that does not exist? The largest study
    is the one when the drug is massively produced and then
    the real numbers come out anything short of that is no
    assurance of anything.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    You can go to anybody you please. I really don't
    understand the logic of going into a Italian restaurant


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    demanding French food and then telling the manager that
    he should


    change

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    his menu.

    Well, I'd like a self serve salad bar for many non-
    addictive meds. So you admit the current system can't
    provide good service so don't ask for it?

    I don't know where you are from but here in the US we don't
    have to wait 6 months to have surgery as in other countries
    who have tried to "fix" their system by government
    intervention. People are coming here from all over the world
    because of the system as there are good doctors all over the
    world. The problem here is the expense for those uninsured.
    Right now the fad is to go to Thailand for plastic surgery
    because it is a lot cheaper.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you are sick you need strong medications.

    Who says I've anything against strong meds? I'd just like
    a greater portion of generic and off-patent meds.

    I was referring to implementing the use inositol versus
    SSRI meds, CoQ-10 and carnitine in heart conditions,
    arginine and carnitine for reduced male potency, vitamin D
    at high levels to help prevent the following: type-1
    diabetes, prostate cancer, breast cancer, autoimmune
    disorders, use of tetracycline-like meds to reduce
    inflammation, estriol versus just estrone and E2,
    testosterone gel versus testosterone patches etc.

    Those are all OTC and so why do you need a doctor to tell
    you about those. That is not their forte and you are mixing
    apples and oranges. They are not trained on that so why do
    you want them to do that? You want them to be massage
    therapist too? You want him to look you in the eye and say,"
    You look like you will develop cancer as I can see it in
    your eyes so I am going to give you some Vit D and then make
    another appointment and see if it worked". That's something
    you do on your own.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    If you want to prevent disease you can go holistic all
    the way but as soon as you get sick then the


    ball

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    game is over. You are admitting defeat by going into the
    doctor. If you have an infection he will give you an
    antibiotic and not ask you to eat a


    moldy

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    bread with penicillium.

    Don't paint me as a Luddite. I am for antibiotics
    when needed.

    Quoted message said:

    Third world countries have always used simpler meds and
    herbs but you


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    talking apples and oranges.

    I wasn't talking about the third world. Why are you?
    Worried about their generic industry cutting into your
    employer's profits?


    I am saying that there are cultural differences that reflect
    ones views. Those with anti-corporate minded people are
    better off in those countries. I am not employed by any drug
    manufacturer but do hospital work. I can tell you
    unequivically much progress has been done in cancer therapy
    and many of diseases since I first started working 25 years
    ago. It is like nite and day.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It is the price gouging that pays for the research to
    find patentable substances.

    Naw. It pays for the drug corporation CEO multi-million
    drug pay packages plus Jiggles his very personal
    assistent. I say cut the over head, keep the scientists.

    Quoted message said:

    Who has the money to fund research involving non-
    patentabe
    substances? Nobody, so in effect you want research
    halted.

    Castrate the political power of the big drug corporations,
    then replace them with an admixture of public funded
    research organizations with publicly supported
    manufacturing and have parallel track of limited size
    corporations that research drugs in which the reward go in
    large measure to the scientists.


    In other words more government control and through a bone to
    the scientists. Sounds like the secret to success, NOT.

    Quoted message said:

    It is about a balancing act in the private sector were
    there needs to be enough profits to pay off the research,
    cover risk, have long enough of a patent to get a good
    profit and enough reward that a good team will seek
    another bit of the apple. Without seeing all costs
    involved generating a new drug with the associated
    manufacturing facilities, we can only argue.

    You are trying to tell somebody how to run their business.
    Try telling that to D Trump and see what he says.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Without greed all research will be halted.

    Nonsense. One just needs a different social construct in
    the form of a mechanism to generate research, production,
    and rewards.

    They tried that and it was called communism comrade. Those
    scientists are now selling nuclear weapons and expertice to
    any country who wants to reward them. .

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    The drug companies often spend their

    Quoted message said:

    resources making copy cat drugs of little or no merit;
    rather, than truly innovating. Perhaps the
    pharmaceutical industry corporations


    need

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to be broken up like Bell telephone was. There need to
    be price controls and can the pay structures within
    the resulting corporation

    Right after they start gas price control and electricity
    and food price control.

    Price controls don't have to be on the moron level of
    dicated finished goods prices; rather, there somewhat more
    subtle methods used for the control of prices as
    implemented in the U.S.A.

    Public power is great and quite superior to private
    electricial power companies. I use public power and I've
    met the board members, men giving back to the community.

    Look what happened in Calfornia and Oregon with private
    electrical power.... what a disaster, a secret power
    cartel of sorts........greed in action to no good purpose.
    Can you say Enron.

    And food price controls, well, the USA has those if you've
    haven't noticed. Why do you think the milk prices just
    went up a little? Why do you think the commodiities such
    milk, peanuts, soy, corn, and wheat are cheap? It is
    because commodity price supports even out the gyrations of
    the market driven distribution system that is impelled by
    forces of fear, greed, supply, and demand. Price supports
    are a very clever mechanism that controls prices and
    provide ample supply.

    And the current war is about oil in part and is an
    indirect subsidy of the oil commodity. Thus as such is an
    oil price "control", it surely controls oil prices in the
    longer term by the mechanism of fear. Not always direct
    fear rather more often indirect fear......it is really
    rather brillant if somewhat risky.

    Anyway, I said that what is needed; I didn't say it was
    about to happen.

    It is a Dark Water world................
    ..........................William A. Noyes

    Meta Communication Postscript: this thread is wandering
    off from the science into the realm of politics. I prefer
    the biochemistry to the politics.

  17. "GMCarter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Robert said:

    What is reasonable profit to one is greed to another so
    your definition


    adds

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    little. The actual profit margin does not define greed.
    Greed is an


    intent

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and not dependent on the sum.

    LOL. I disagree somewhat. Again, you justify horrific
    behavior by muddying the waters.

    I met the Dalai Lama in Costa Rica years ago. I seriously
    doubt he cares about health care issues.

    Quoted message said:


    Best of luck in your journey!

    George M. Carter

    ** Dalai Lama Quote of the Week

    There are two kinds of food- food for mental hunger and
    food for physical hunger. Thus a combination of these two-
    material progress and spiritual development is the most
    practical thing. I think that many Americans, particularly
    young Americans, realize that material progress alone is
    not the full answer for human life. Right now all of the
    Eastern nations are trying to copy Western technology. We
    Easterners such as Tibetans, like myself, look to Western
    technology feeling that once we develop material progress,
    our people can reach some sort of permanent happiness. But
    when I come to Europe or North America, I see that
    underneath the beautiful surface there is still
    unhappiness, mental unrest, and restlessness. This shows
    that material progress alone is not the full answer for
    human beings.

    -- His Holiness the Dalai Lama, from The Dalai Lama, A
    Policy of Kindness, published by Snow Lion Publications.

  18. On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:52:32 -0700, "Robert" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "GMCarter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Robert said:


    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >
    Greed is good when balanced with a social conscience.
    When left
    > completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth
    > policy that is un-sustainable and in this case is
    > sickening and killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of
    greed but greed is


    part

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of human nature and you can't eliminate it simply
    because you don't like


    it.

    Quoted message said:


    This is just a lie that's been foisted on us. There is a
    BIG difference between greed -- outright avarice, use of
    money as a tool of power, etc. -- and the desire to have
    housing, shelter, food, health care. Even buddhist
    teaching embraces this, suggesting a middle way between
    the privation of an ascetic and the hoarding piggishness
    of people like Bush.

    You mention the buddhist, did you know that you must give
    food offering to the monks for them to eat. In so doing you
    yourself benefit from it. It is a form of greed in the
    giving and in the taking.

    Ah--no. It is not greed. That's a distortion of the meaning
    of the term. If a monk demands fees and wants to live
    lavishly, which of course has happened, THAT is greed.

    Quoted message said:

    You give so you will directly benefit.

    Yes. But you GIVE. We all must give. We all receive. If your
    intent is to receive more and more and more for very little
    giving, you get into the dire pathology of greed.

    Quoted message said:

    Money is a tool that is exchanged and with it comes power.
    Give money to the poor and they receive the power. Give
    money to a homeless person and he buys a bottle of rum.

    LOL. You are a bigot. SOME homeless people will buy rum.
    OTHERS will not. And I would RATHER give to a homeless
    person or a person in need rather than support the golden
    parachute of some incompetent CEO of a pharmaceutical
    company who takes drugs like Erbitux and charges so much,
    most people will never be able to afford them.

    The rich are TAKING more and more--thanks to people like
    Bush and his cadre of repugnicans "tax break for the rich,
    spend on the military and corporations" boys.

    Quoted message said:

    Giver a house or more power and he buys more drugs. A
    homeless person will kill another over his park bench.
    Greed is part of human nature and it has been
    institutionalized. You went to school so you could make
    more money and success is pure greed.

    LOL...no. I did not go to school to make more money. That's
    YOUR psychosis, not mine. There is more to learning and
    education than just the relentless pursuit of cash.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Muslims have a saying that I hope I don't too much
    injustice to that goes something like we should have
    enough to walk through the day.

    There are balances. Greed is NOT good. Greed is
    aberration that causes suffering.


    You don't understand greed then as it is the intentiional
    act of concentrating power. If you better yourself in any
    way then it is a greedful act. If you apply for a job in
    which there are a thousand applicants and you get the job
    then it is a greedful act to accept it.

    Quoted message said:


    Doing good -- discovering a new drug--or simply WORKING
    on such discovery is not greed. Being rewarded adequately
    for such a discovery is not greed. Taking excessive
    advantage of anti-competitive patent law to squeeze the
    last dime out of people who need the product to stay
    alive or let them suffer and die if they cannot afford it
    IS greed. Explain to me how that is good?

    George M. Carter


    You are spending money trying to discover a new drug when
    you could give it to the poor is greed. You call it a
    reward but in fact it is greed.

    You have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about. Your
    world view is so dark, ugly and cynical that I can only hope
    you will find some light and healing.

    There is a BIG difference between basic needs of the body
    and spirit and the pathology of greed. Your examples do
    nothing to clarify that distinction but rather seek to muddy
    it to justify bad behavior.

    George M. Carter

  19. "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "tcomeau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >
    Greed is good when balanced with a social conscience.
    When left
    > completely unfettered it follows a scorched-earth
    > policy that is un-sustainable and in this case is
    > sickening and killing millions.

    There is good greed and you mention the bad form of
    greed but greed is


    part

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of human nature and you can't eliminate it simply
    because you don't like


    it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The *only* good greed is the one that is balanced with a
    social concience.

    No, social concience has institutionalized greed to make
    it accepted. I spill a cup of hot coffee on myself and
    blame it on the store I bought it at and win millions of
    dollares. It is legal and accepted by society.

    Neither of these two examples of greed (pharma and hot-
    coffee lawsuits) has anything to do with social concience
    nor does it illustrate that social concience has anything to
    do with institutionalization of greed. That is your own
    construct and your own disjointed and strange
    interpretation.

    Unfettered free enterprise has made greed acceptable and
    institutionalized.

    Quoted message said:

    People give to charieties because it is tax deductable.

    Hardly an example of greed. More like fiscal prudence. If
    the rules allow it and a charity can use it, why not?

    Quoted message said:

    You have people fighting over funds for research. The HIV
    people vs the cancer people and the men's health issues vs
    the women's health issues. Is it noble to support AID's
    research when funding was taken out of cancer research?

    You have all kinds of researchers looking to get rich of of
    the funds earmarked for this research. Many of them will do
    useless research simply to get the funding. They are greedy
    and are a cancer upon the face of the earth.

    Quoted message said:

    You have competing moralities ie competing greed.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    > > The medical community doesn't work for the good of
    > > the patient?
    > >
    >
    > Nope. Certainly not every medical practitioner. A
    > few maybe, and I feel I'm being generous to them by
    > saying that.

    Then why go to one and why are you so concerned about
    them?

    I go and get an opinion. I make the last decision
    regarding treatment. I look to them as advisors or a
    source of necessary medication. I decide if it is
    necessary.


    How can you get an independent medical opinion from
    doctors who are bought buy the drug companies and read
    articles written by those same companies? The answer is
    that it has been going on for many years and you simply
    find somebody you can trust until he does something that
    is untrustworthy.

    I did not say anything about an independent opinion. I said
    an opinion. Doctors cannot be trusted to make the final
    decision regarding your health care. That is your
    responsibility.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    There is the problem in a nutshell. We cannot depend on
    our only source of medical care to do what we expect of
    them, that is provide actual working treatments with the
    minimal amount of invasive drugs or procedures. We
    cannot trust them to do what they are expected to do.

    We have and we do. People were dying with AIDS within
    months. They, people with HIV, protested and wanted
    changes handcuffing the drug companies. Fast track
    examptions were passed and many newer drugs were developed
    and put in use. This was unprecedented and completely
    opposite of what people here are asking for. They made it
    easier on the drug companies for patent money making and
    lawsuits and toxicity etc. Bottom line people are living
    with HIV for years now. Clamp down on everybody and you
    get no change for years and years.

    You may, I don't.

    Are you aware that the HIV/AIDS connection has never been
    shown to meet Koch's Postulates. The AIDS debacle is
    another example of unfettered greed in the medical and
    reseach field.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Where does that leave us? Alone to figure things out on
    our own. There is no alternative except to educate
    ourselves. Many who fail to see this will suffer at the
    hand of the greedy [censored].

    Entilement is another form of greed. I am entiled to this
    or not and if one person has something then I am entiled
    to it aswell. Greedy [censored] are out to make money so
    what entiles you to something they have for free? What
    entiles you to think that you deserve anything?

    I ask for nothing more than for professional medical people
    to have some integrity.

    Quoted message said:

    You have people with leprosy going to a remote village
    doctor in Africa for treatment and I don't see that person
    asking the doctor about drug company connections.

    Dollars to donuts that the doctor in the village has no drug
    company connections whatsoever. By being in the village we
    know that greed is not their motivation. They aren't worth
    anything to the pharmas anyway. The pharmas want higher up
    people like university dept heads and prominent researchers
    to carry their word to the rest of the profession.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    There is no such thing as an impartial researcher or
    neutral unbiased observer. All research is biased so
    exactly what are you researching.


    You

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't need research to follow your own prejudice. You
    can have two conflicting research articles and follow
    anyone you want to. You can't


    live

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    up to your own standards as absolute truth does not
    exist, only


    temporary

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    relative truths that are time dependent.

    Of course there is no completely impartial researcher
    in the general sense. We all hold certain beliefs and
    we will try to confirm these beliefs thru research. But
    we should understand the corruption inherent in having
    70% of our scientists and researchers going into
    research projects with a specific financially/funding
    motivated goal

    Eliminate 70% of all research and you lost a century. You
    really don't believe in research as it has always been
    sponsored by other individuals.

    Eliminate 70% of the research and you have a credible and
    useable scientific community. Eliminate 70% of the
    research and you lose the BS and gain credibility as a
    field of science. Eliminate 70% of the reseach and you
    become real sience.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in mind. We should have checks and balances in place to
    identify when these researchers fudge the numbers, and
    when they get caught fudging the numbers they should be
    appropriately flogged publicly.


    It is too costly to do so and a waste of time. The FDA,
    one this rich country does not have the money.

    [censored]. What a friggin' cop out. We cannot afford to
    continue without checks and balances. Without these checks
    and balances we are just killing people for the sake of
    greed and profits.

    Quoted message said:

    If the finding are valid and it works then others will
    prosper through making money. People take drugs for
    conditions to help them out and if it doesn't help them
    out then they don't take them. Fudging numbers is common
    but if its an important study it will be found out later
    with follow-up studies.

    Fudging numbers is the name of the game, buddy. Later when
    people have died. I'd rather we have the system in place to
    catch the fudged number up front and prosecute people than
    release drugs that will kill people.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    Researchers should have to declare their financial
    interests up front and we will take that into account
    when we throw their research in the waste basket.
    Doctors should take nothing from pharmaceutical reps for
    fear of being accordingly tainted by what amounts to a
    bribe.


    They did a study about how many people cheat on their
    income tax returns. Did you know you are not suppose to
    do that?

    And you point would be???????

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Universities should clearly state its industry funding
    and not allow it to dictate their curriculums. Non-
    profit organizations should avoid, at all costs,
    taking money from industry sources, because to do so
    taints them.

    That is really childish and I do not know of any Non-
    profit organization that will not take money from
    industry. You are way off there.

    Why is it childish to expect scientific integrity from an
    institution of advanced learning? Should they not teach the
    scientific truth to their paying clients that are taking
    the courses?

    Is it childish to expect non-profit organizations to be
    independent of industry? If they accept money from industry
    and adjust their policies and operations accordingly then
    they are no longer working independent of profit then aren't
    they? They are working on behalf of for-profit
    organizations, aren't they? The moment it can be shown that
    they have taken money from a for-profit organization, they
    should lose their non-profit status, period.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    There is nothing wrong with free enterprise as long as
    we all understand the concepts of corruption, conflict
    of interest, professional integrity and independence.
    And as long as we are clear as to the financial interest
    involved for each and every participant in the medical
    and research fields.

    Unfettered, unchecked and hidden from public scrutiny,
    greed destroys the basic integrity of science. The
    perfect example of this is the sciences of nutrition and
    drugs.

    TC

    You and I have a fundamental difference of thought. I can
    distinguish wrong from right and you can't.

    TC

  20. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You mention the buddhist, did you know that you must give
    food offering


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the monks for them to eat. In so doing you yourself
    benefit from it. It


    is a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    form of greed in the giving and in the taking.

    Ah--no. It is not greed. That's a distortion of the
    meaning of the term. If a monk demands fees and wants
    to live lavishly, which of course has happened, THAT
    is greed.

    The religious norm makes it a demand and worse if you don't
    then bad karma is implied as thus it is an implied demand.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    You give so you will directly benefit.

    Yes. But you GIVE. We all must give. We all receive. If
    your intent is to receive more and more and more for very
    little giving, you get into the dire pathology of greed.

    To give with the expectations for something in return
    is greed. It is no longer a gift but a payment for a
    power transfer.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Money is a tool that is exchanged and with it comes
    power. Give money to the poor and they receive the
    power. Give money to a homeless person and he buys a
    bottle of rum.

    LOL. You are a bigot. SOME homeless people will buy rum.
    OTHERS will not. And I would RATHER give to a homeless
    person or a person in need rather than support the golden
    parachute of some incompetent CEO of a pharmaceutical
    company who takes drugs like Erbitux and charges so much,
    most people will never be able to afford them.

    I see no difference in either case as I have mentioned both
    suffer to the same extent of greed. It is not quantity
    dependent.

    Quoted message said:


    The rich are TAKING more and more--thanks to people like
    Bush and his cadre of repugnicans "tax break for the rich,
    spend on the military and corporations" boys.

    They learned that when they were poor.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Giver a house or more power and he buys more drugs. A
    homeless person will kill another over his park bench.


    Greed

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    is part of human nature and it has been
    institutionalized. You went to school so you could make
    more money and success is pure greed.

    LOL...no. I did not go to school to make more money.
    That's YOUR psychosis, not mine. There is more to learning
    and education than just the relentless pursuit of cash.

    Education costs money and it creates monetary opportunities.
    Only one who could not afford the education, economically
    and socially knows that.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You are spending money trying to discover a new drug when
    you could give


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to the poor is greed. You call it a reward but in fact it
    is greed.

    You have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about.
    Your world view is so dark, ugly and cynical that I can
    only hope you will find some light and healing.

    There is a BIG difference between basic needs of the body
    and spirit and the pathology of greed. Your examples do
    nothing to clarify that distinction but rather seek to
    muddy it to justify bad behavior.

    George M. Carter

    There is no noble distinction that comes into play. I do
    not justify it but only reflect on it on balance. On
    balance more people would be dead without drugs than
    without them. Basic psychology applies to everyone. The
    poor are not noble because they are poor and the rich are
    not evil for the same reason.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.