Road Cycling · Public discussion

Gravity always wins?

Started by Luigi de Guzman · · Last activity · 15 posts · 326 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
3 November 2005
Last activity
6 November 2005
Original author
Luigi de Guzman
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
326
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. So there's a net elevation loss between my house and the Metro station,
    five miles and change away.

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    Logic tells me I should be much slower coming home, but somehow it isn't
    so. And it isn't because I'm a phenomenal climber, because I'm not.

    Go figure.

    Other nice things about my commute tonight: new headlight (for which see
    appropriate post). And it seems that the second blinkie I have attached
    to my backside works as intended--I got honked at just as I left the Metro
    station. Mind, I wasn't doing anything but riding 15 mph in a 25 mph
    zone, with plenty of space for a car to overtake safely if necessary. The
    chap in the corolla honked not once, but twice, and gunned his engine to
    blow by me...and right into a 4-way screeching stop. But he saw me, so
    that's good!

    -Luigi

  2. Don't let gravity get you down.

    *g*

  3. Luigi de Guzman said:

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    Logic tells me I should be much slower coming home, but somehow it isn't
    so.

    Time goes slower when you're going uphill. It's the relativity thing.

    Rich

  4. Luigi de Guzman said:

    So there's a net elevation loss between my house and the Metro station,
    five miles and change away.

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    Logic tells me I should be much slower coming home, but somehow it isn't
    so. And it isn't because I'm a phenomenal climber, because I'm not.

    Go figure.

    Do you ride in a northerly direction heading in and a southerly
    direction heading home? (probably, or else you would wind up in MoCo and
    not NoVA!) The wind was reasonably strong and steady (10-15 mph) out of
    the north all day yesterday, which would have given you a a decent
    headwind coming in and a tailwind on the way back.

  5. I find that I ride faster going home than to work.

  6. Rich wrote:
    ::
    :: Time goes slower when you're going uphill. It's the relativity
    :: thing.

    It's true!

  7. Luigi de Guzman said:

    So there's a net elevation loss between my house and the Metro station,
    five miles and change away.

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    Logic tells me I should be much slower coming home, but somehow it isn't
    so. And it isn't because I'm a phenomenal climber, because I'm not.

    Go figure.

    Which way was the wind blowing?
    John Kane, Kingston ON Canada

    Quoted message said:


    Other nice things about my commute tonight: new headlight (for which see
    appropriate post). And it seems that the second blinkie I have attached
    to my backside works as intended--I got honked at just as I left the Metro
    station. Mind, I wasn't doing anything but riding 15 mph in a 25 mph
    zone, with plenty of space for a car to overtake safely if necessary. The
    chap in the corolla honked not once, but twice, and gunned his engine to
    blow by me...and right into a 4-way screeching stop. But he saw me, so
    that's good!

    -Luigi

  8. Luigi de Guzman said:


    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    I find that I'm considerably slower in the morning than in the
    afternoon/evening. I speculate that it's a metabolism thing???

    Keep a log over several days, to get a larger sample. You could also try
    riding to the Metro station and back on the weekend -- once in the
    morning, and once in the evening. See if the times correlate better with
    the terrain when the out and back are at the same time of day.

    I'm curious to see what you discover.

    Reid

  9. Luigi de Guzman said:

    So there's a net elevation loss between my house and the Metro station,
    five miles and change away.

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    What's the traffic light situation? They can add up to 10% to my
    commute time.

    - Frank Krygowski

  10. Luigi de Guzman said:

    So there's a net elevation loss between my house and the Metro station,
    five miles and change away.

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    What's the traffic light situation? They can add up to 10% to my
    commute time.

    - Frank Krygowski

  11. Luigi de Guzman said:
    Quoted message said:

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely


    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?


    I think you are just excited to get home ;-)

  12. Reid Priedhorsky said:
    Luigi de Guzman said:

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    I find that I'm considerably slower in the morning than in the
    afternoon/evening. I speculate that it's a metabolism thing???

    Keep a log over several days, to get a larger sample. You could also try
    riding to the Metro station and back on the weekend -- once in the
    morning, and once in the evening. See if the times correlate better with
    the terrain when the out and back are at the same time of day.

    I'm curious to see what you discover.

    On my commute, I find that car traffic is a lot heavier on the afternoon
    leg than on the morning leg. This can slow you down a little, even
    though your not quite as constrained by traffic flow as a car. For
    example, at one point I cross an 8-lane mega-arterial with an 2 lanes of
    frontage road on each side and a total right-of-way of approximately 100
    ft. In the morning, traffic is bad due to rush hour. In the afternoon,
    traffic is even worse, because you take the same commuters and add on
    people driving to the grocery store or soccer practice or whatever.
    Sometimes it takes 3 minutes to get across in the afternoon. God I hate
    that road! The only redeeming feature about trying to cross it is that
    it's less nervewracking than actually riding on it, with 6x8 and 8x8
    arterial clusterf*cks every mile.

  13. Luigi, next time take note of which way the wind is blowing (both ways).
    Methinks this might play a bigger factor than the miniscule rate of
    elevation gain/loss.

    - -

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    "May you have the winds at your back,
    And a really low gear for the hills!"

    Chris'Z Corner
    http://www.geocities.com/czcorner

  14. Aerodynamic resistance is the main factor in limiting bicycle
    speed. Especially when you're going at a fast clip, factors such as
    hills that are no more than moderately inclined or the weight of the
    bike, aren't nearly as important as air drag. If you were bucking a 10
    mph headwind one way, going generally downhill, a 10 mph tailwind on the
    return trip could make up for the hills, regarding average comparitive
    speed.

    Obviously, very long and steep hills can overwhelm the significance
    of air drag, as shown by the 60 mph downhill speeds in some races on
    mountainous courses.

    Steve McDonald

  15. Luigi de Guzman said:

    So there's a net elevation loss between my house and the Metro station,
    five miles and change away.

    In the morning, wearing no goofy clothes, I cover the distance, largely
    downhill, in 28 minutes. (See how slow and fat I've become! ugh!)

    In the evening, on my way home, facing the steepest hill in town and a net
    elevation gain, I cover the distance in...28 minutes.

    huh?

    Logic tells me I should be much slower coming home, but somehow it isn't
    so. And it isn't because I'm a phenomenal climber, because I'm not.

    A bit of time with topo maps and my daughter's GPS showed me home is a
    hundred feet and change higher than work. But local topography beats
    net topography. Going to work, there's a ridge in the middle (any way
    I go!), which is a bear to climb. Coming home, it's downhill on that
    ridge, and one light in the next mile and change. Since the other
    rises are pretty moderate, that hill can kick my average speed up on
    the way home.

    Pat

    Email address works as is.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.