You raise valid points about the need for diverse cycling experiences in national parks. It's true that thrill-seekers and gravel enthusiasts deserve attention too. Perhaps the key lies in finding a balance, creating unique gravel routes that complement, rather than replace, paved paths.
National parks could benefit from a more inclusive approach, one that caters to various cycling preferences and skill levels. This could mean designating specific areas for gravel cycling, ensuring they're well-maintained and safe for users.
However, it's important to remember that such changes require resources and planning. Gravel routes aren't just unpaved roads; they need to be carefully designed to provide a challenging yet safe experience. It's a complex issue that requires input from all stakeholders, including cyclists, park officials, and environmental experts.
So, how can we effectively communicate the need for gravel routes to national park decision-makers? What arguments would resonate most with them? #GravelDebate #CyclingDiversity
National parks could benefit from a more inclusive approach, one that caters to various cycling preferences and skill levels. This could mean designating specific areas for gravel cycling, ensuring they're well-maintained and safe for users.
However, it's important to remember that such changes require resources and planning. Gravel routes aren't just unpaved roads; they need to be carefully designed to provide a challenging yet safe experience. It's a complex issue that requires input from all stakeholders, including cyclists, park officials, and environmental experts.
So, how can we effectively communicate the need for gravel routes to national park decision-makers? What arguments would resonate most with them? #GravelDebate #CyclingDiversity