Road Cycling · Public discussion

GP d'Ouverture -- 2 things...

Started by John Forrest Tomlinson · · Last activity · 12 posts · 451 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
1 February 2006
Last activity
3 February 2006
Original author
John Forrest Tomlinson
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
451
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2006/jan06/gpmarseillaise06/marseille004

    Unibet needs to work on color spec -- the green in their hats and
    jersey (and on their team car -- see next pic) don't match. My masters
    fattie team is more coordinated than that....

    Geslin is coming along nicely.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  2. Quoted message said:

    Unibet needs to work on color spec -- the green in their hats and
    jersey (and on their team car -- see next pic) don't match. My masters
    fattie team is more coordinated than that....

    It's the new style, man. Check out the shots of Robbie Hunter getting
    torched by Boonen at Stage 1 of this year's Tour of Qatar. For some
    reason, BMC has decided to compliment Phonak's Lime-and-Tequila
    uniforms with a black/red frame.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2006/jan06/qatar06/qatar061/Nic24568

    -Cosmo
    http://cyclocosm.com

  3. all true.. it really would look better if they made a flippin effort..
    that said it is a thing now for some reason.. hardly anyone has good
    matching kit anymore.. but at the end of the day.. they are doing real
    races, so.....

  4. oh, man. Look at this one:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2006/feb06/besseges06/besseges061/FSbesseges061_004

    That's definately a T-Mobile helmet. Something is amiss.

    -Cosmo
    http://cyclocosm.com

  5. Quoted message said:

    oh, man. Look at this one:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2006/feb06/besseges06/besseges061/FSbesseges061_004

    That's definately a T-Mobile helmet. Something is amiss.

    oh c'mon! who hasn't forgotten to bring their helmet to a race ?

  6. On 1 Feb 2006 12:22:50 -0800, "DepartFictif" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    all true.. it really would look better if they made a flippin effort..
    that said it is a thing now for some reason.. hardly anyone has good
    matching kit anymore.. but at the end of the day.. they are doing real
    races, so.....

    Colors that are blantantly different -- blue suits, say, and yelow
    bikes can be really good. Colors that look like they were supposed to
    match but don't are really bad.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  7. email hidden said:

    oh, man. Look at this one:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=photos/2006/feb06/besseges06/besseges061/FSbesseges061_004

    That's definately a T-Mobile helmet. Something is amiss.

    I looked at that and thought "Gee, that looks like VDB, but it can't
    be. Isn't he dead or in jail or in a clinic or something? Or fat and
    on a beach in the Caribbean or something?"

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  8. John Forrest Tomlinson said:

    On 1 Feb 2006 12:22:50 -0800, "DepartFictif" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    all true.. it really would look better if they made a flippin effort..
    that said it is a thing now for some reason.. hardly anyone has good
    matching kit anymore.. but at the end of the day.. they are doing real
    races, so.....

    Colors that are blantantly different -- blue suits, say, and yelow
    bikes can be really good. Colors that look like they were supposed to
    match but don't are really bad.

    http://www.jt10000.com/images/fpns.jpg

  9. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    DepartFictif said:

    all true.. it really would look better if they made a flippin effort..
    that said it is a thing now for some reason.. hardly anyone has good
    matching kit anymore.. but at the end of the day.. they are doing real
    races, so.....

    This is a discussion of the difference between appalling
    and shocking. I do not remark upon aesthetics of bicycle
    kit color schemes; and if I did none would escape censure.
    I figure that the colors make it easier to identify the
    contestants, not to make them look good.

    --
    Michael Press

  10. Then you are neglecting the sponsor... "looking good" as you put it is
    called advertizzzing! = the basis of the sport of cycling!

  11. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    DepartFictif said:

    Then you are neglecting the sponsor... "looking good" as you put it is
    called advertizzzing! = the basis of the sport of cycling!

    Advertisers advertise. Looking good has nothing to do with
    it. They try to _prescribe_ what looks good; not abide
    with and learn from what has proven over the ages to look
    good. Look at the sleaze buckets wearing suits in the GQ
    advertisements; look at the skanks in Elle and Vogue; I
    can smell their breath from here.

    --
    Michael Press

  12. Michael Press said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    DepartFictif said:

    Then you are neglecting the sponsor... "looking good" as you put it is
    called advertizzzing! = the basis of the sport of cycling!

    Advertisers advertise. Looking good has nothing to do with
    it. They try to _prescribe_ what looks good; not abide
    with and learn from what has proven over the ages to look
    good. Look at the sleaze buckets wearing suits in the GQ
    advertisements; look at the skanks in Elle and Vogue; I
    can smell their breath from here.

    --
    Michael Press

    Yeah but they fit the current definition of looking good. What the
    hell does character have to do with presenting a good looking image.
    Notice I didn't say presenting a good image, that's a whole different
    category. Pam Anderson presents a good looking image, Alexandra Paul
    presents a good image, and looks good doing it.
    Bill C

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.