"Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
It doesn't speed up the reading of them, though. Have fun catching up, and welcome back.
Thanks. You are correct - it doesn't speed the reading, but I have been keeping an eye on it by reading the stuff on google groups. Now I'm back on my own PC, braodband enabled... but with only 1MB and not the 2MB we are supposed to have...
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) someone who may be "Helen C Simmons" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote this:-
Quoted message said:
I've been using a slow dial-up account on a different machine and yes, you get used to it. But it is a PITA!
I'm sure a web based interface to Usenet, like Google, is painfully slow on a dial-up system. It isn't so much of a problem with a proper newsreader, though with broadband the headers and bodies of messages do arrive much faster. Replies go off immediately, which is sometimes not good:-)
In message <[email hidden]>, David Hansen <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) someone who may be "Helen C Simmons" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote this:-
Quoted message said:
I've been using a slow dial-up account on a different machine and yes, you get used to it. But it is a PITA!
I'm sure a web based interface to Usenet, like Google, is painfully slow on a dial-up system. It isn't so much of a problem with a proper newsreader, though with broadband the headers and bodies of messages do arrive much faster.
Though on BB I continue to use an offline newsreader, which downloads complete messages every ten minutes or so, so don't notice any difference in that aspect.
Quoted message said:
Replies go off immediately, which is sometimes not good:-)
Mine wait in the aforesaid newsreaders outbox for a wee bit before being sent, been useful on more than one occasions..... -- Chris French
"Helen C Simmons" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Thanks. You are correct - it doesn't speed the reading, but I have been keeping an eye on it by reading the stuff on google groups. Now I'm back on my own PC, braodband enabled... but with only 1MB and not the 2MB we are supposed to have...
Ah, like us, you'll be in the sticks. I think BT say 2MB if it's possible, otherwise you get slower.
I think it's pretty darn impressive that I get even 1MB down such a crappy piece of wire, so I'm not too unhappy :-)
"Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Helen C Simmons" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Thanks. You are correct - it doesn't speed the reading, but I have been keeping an eye on it by reading the stuff on google groups. Now I'm back on my own PC, braodband enabled... but with only 1MB and not the 2MB we are supposed to have...
Ah, like us, you'll be in the sticks. I think BT say 2MB if it's possible, otherwise you get slower.
I think it's pretty darn impressive that I get even 1MB down such a crappy piece of wire, so I'm not too unhappy :-)
cheers, clive
Oh we are close enough to the exchange for 2MB - it's literally a few hundred yards away!