General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Goin' down on Downie.

Started by Apusapus · · Last activity · 14 posts · 648 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 October 2003
Last activity
3 November 2003
Original author
Apusapus
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
648
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Tim Downie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Wobbot, it was kind of you to attempt to slap Timothy on the head, but I see you've been your usual
    ineffective self. I suppose that's what happens when you send a boy to do a man's job...

    Timmy, in my time on Usenet I've spoken to many people. Most I like, a few I dislike, the odd one or
    two I despise. Peter Ashby falls into the latter category, as do you. Why? Well, the *exact* reasons
    are neither here nor there. Everything in life is subjective. I could write 1,500 words on you both
    and it would still be a question of perspective, there is no 'right' or 'wrong' in the matter. All
    we can do when formulating opinions is to be true to our instincts and hope that they guide us
    appropriately.

    Let's cut to the chase. Was it fair of me to report Peter's breach of contract - for that it what it
    was - to his employers? Fair? Possibly not. The right thing to do? I believe so. It's hard for me to
    judge - I loathe the man, therefore I'm biased. It's in my nature to confront 'wrong' (yup, by that
    I refer to things I define as wrong) and to offer the offender an opportunity to mend their ways. If
    they choose to continue to demonstrate unacceptable behaviour - as did Peter - they invite a stern
    rebuke. No-one working at any level within the public sector should be permitted to abuse *any*
    aspect of a publicly-funded organisation, whether it be by 'borrowing' photocopy paper or by
    spending their working time and employers money on Usenet. It really is that simple, although I
    can't say I'm surprised that you would seek to argue otherwise.

    I think that a closer examination of any 'bullying' instances to which you refer would reveal a
    similar consistency of thought. I find certain character traits hard to take. I tend to dump heavily
    on individuals displaying those traits. Is this wrong? Well, I guess some would say that depends on
    the strength and validity of your personal convictions, which bring us neatly back to perception
    again. I think the key test is whether I would act in a similar manner in Real Life; in other words,
    are the standards I espouse via my Usenet persona consistent with the way I would normally behave?
    Well, I did offer to meet you for a drink. You've passed on an opportunity to make your own Real
    Life assessment.

    You accuse me of using my ability with words to dominate or exert undue influence. I really can't
    accept that. I write stuff. People write back. Despite my moaning about grammar or syntax, what
    matters in any exchange is the quality of the ideas contained therein. I could be the most
    articulate writer in the world, but if what I'm saying sucks then that's clear for all to see. Good
    grief, I've been hammered by some rec.runners who can barely type but who have instinctively
    disassembled 'Rogers' opinions with a few well chosen words. And that's OK, 'cause if 'Rogers'
    trolls were that easily shredded they were fully deserving of such treatment.

    Do I need an audience to "satify (sic) his ego and his insecurities"? Hell, were I looking for an
    audience I think I could find a more populated group than r.r or uk.r.r., don't you? I'd also
    imagine that I have fewer insecurities than most - you don't hang out your thoughts for everyone to
    take shots at if you're insecure - and I think my ego has been bruised more than massaged by the
    rec.runners, no?

    I'm here 'cause I enjoy running and I enjoy teasing the rec.runners. I find runners to be robust
    souls capable of giving as good as they get. And occasionally, as a bonus, you get to stumble across
    someone like Common, Lustig or McBrowse who have a unique and charming way of expressing their
    thoughts. I believe I fit in quite well.

    Timmy, I think your 'net-meister personality is beginning to cloud your judgement. Usenet is a
    larger-than-life world containing the crazy, the devious and the completely normal. It's hardly
    surprising that some find it a bumpy ride, but as for suggesting that cruelty lurks here I think
    that's a bridge too far. You want to confront cruelty? Go wander through the streets in your town
    centre at night and look around you. Talk to the kids. Talk to the elderly. All around you - if you
    care to look - is evidence of real abuse, real suffering, real cruelty. And where do *you* choose to
    see abuse in this world? You see it in me on Usenet. If that wasn't so sad it would be funny.

    May I suggest a mantra for you? Get. Things. Into. Perspective.

    And please, for all our sake's, do it soon.

    Roger.

  2. Someones bored. Of course we would too if we wasted our time reading this [censored].

    apusapus said:

    "Tim Downie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Wobbot, it was kind of you to attempt to slap Timothy on the head, but I see you've been your usual
    ineffective self. I suppose that's what happens when you send a boy to do a man's job...

    Please! He was on his knees begging for mercy.

  3. [email protected] said:

    Someones bored. Of course we would too if we wasted our time reading this [censored].

    There's nothing upsets a Roger more than the thought that there's someone out there who not only
    doesn't worship him but isn't reading his messages.

    Tells you a lot about who needs who.

    Tim
    --
    Remove the obvious to reply by email.

  4. Tim Downie said:
    [email protected] said:

    Someones bored. Of course we would too if we wasted our time reading this [censored].

    There's nothing upsets a Roger more than the thought that there's someone out there who not only
    doesn't worship him but isn't reading his messages.

    Tells you a lot about who needs who.

    Tim\

    I know, that's why I may read a paragraph or two, but when it's obvious he has no idea what he's
    talking about (as in the 10k thread) and it's just more of his drivel, I just skip over it. And I be
    sure he KNOWS I didn't read it too! Hee hee hee

    Bill <who is anxiously awaiting the denials and/or angry fit that will follow

  5. "turkie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    WHAT! You piece of s**t! How DARE you fail to read my missives! I LIVE for your approval. Goddamn
    it, click on that post and READ THE THING *NOW*!!!

    There, I feel better.

    Wobbot, we both know that - being filled with curiosity - we are completely unable to pass by the
    each others musings without peeking, even if we only mutter an expletive under our breath and move
    on. I don't mind you pretending - I do it myself on occasion - so I shan't offer to fulfil all your
    wildest fantasies if you can tell me what my second-to-last sentence was all about. We'll just
    pretend you haven't a clue.

    Roger.

  6. "Tim Downie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There's nothing upsets a Roger more than the thought that there's someone out there who not only
    doesn't worship him but isn't reading his messages.

    Oh there is. It's the thought of someone reading them and still not learning anything about
    themselves or the world in which they live.

    Quoted message said:

    Tells you a lot about who needs who.

    Who needs whom.

    Roger.

  7. apusapus said:

    "turkie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    WHAT! You piece of s**t! How DARE you fail to read my missives! I LIVE for your approval. Goddamn
    it, click on that post and READ THE THING *NOW*!!!

    There, I feel better.

    Wobbot, we both know that -

    ?

  8. "turkie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    ?

    Aaaaaaarrrrrgh!

    Roger.

  9. You know, just the title of this thread makes me gag...

  10. apusapus said:

    "turkie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    ?

    Aa


    ?

  11. "turkie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You know, just the title of this thread makes me gag...

    It was meant to, as was the subject...

    Roger.

  12. apusapus said:

    It was

    ????

  13. "apusapus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tim Downie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Wobbot, it was kind of you to attempt to slap Timothy on the head, but I see you've been your
    usual ineffective self. I suppose that's what happens when you send a boy to do a man's job...

    To bad your an idiot and neither of the above. weasel maybe but no man.

    Peter Ashby falls into the latter

    Quoted message said:

    category, as do you. Why?

    Because they are your superiors. Cretins such as you are mearly jealous.

    Quoted message said:

    Let's cut to the chase. Was it fair of me to report Peter's breach of contract - for that it what
    it was - to his employers?

    No and you cry like any other bully when you get your own in return.

    Fair? Possibly

    Quoted message said:

    not. The right thing to do? I believe so.

    No it was not. Show the harm. It is far greater harm for you to lie about being a physican or
    mercenary or runner then for ashby to post from a free computer.

    It's in my nature to confront

    Quoted message said:

    'wrong'


    The you are a hypocrite as lieing is a far greater harm.

    \ If they choose to continue to

    Quoted message said:

    demonstrate unacceptable behaviour - as did Peter - they invite a stern rebuke.


    As you do yet you pbject strenuously and run away when spanked.

    No-one working at any level within the public sector

    Quoted message said:

    should be permitted to abuse *any* aspect of a publicly-funded organisation, whether it be by
    'borrowing' photocopy paper or by spending their working time and employers money on Usenet.

    Yet you do the same. "Don't post from your own machine"

    Quoted message said:

    I think that a closer examination of any 'bullying' instances to


    which you

    Quoted message said:

    refer would reveal a similar consistency of thought.

    Yet all you are is an internet bully. \ I think the key test is

    Quoted message said:

    whether I would act in a similar manner in Real Life; in other words, are the standards I espouse
    via my Usenet persona consistent with the way I would normally behave?

    Obviously not.

    Quoted message said:

    back. Despite my moaning about grammar or syntax, what matters in any exchange is the quality of
    the ideas contained therein.

    NO they do not to you. If ideas and ethics meant anything you would not troll at all. You simply
    wish to disrupt and harass. You are a low life similar to Princess Diania's Butler only with less
    credibility.

    I could be the

    Quoted message said:

    most articulate writer in the world, but if what I'm saying sucks then that's clear for
    all to see.

    Finally and admission of guilt. It sucks.

    Quoted message said:


    Do I need an audience to "satify (sic) his ego and his insecurities"? Hell, were I looking for an
    audience I think I could find a more populated group than r.r or uk.r.r., don't you?

    Most likely not. In any reasonable flame group you would be eaten alive.

    Quoted message said:

    and I think my ego has been bruised more than massaged by the rec.runners, no?

    You get what you deserve.

    Quoted message said:


    I'm here 'cause I enjoy running and I enjoy teasing the rec.runners.

    No you are hear to bully people who are by far your betters including Ashby and Downie. I am simply
    your mirror. I am you.

    Quoted message said:

    . I believe I fit in quite well.


    You don't fit in with illiterate junkies. They have a high social standing.

    . It's hardly surprising that some find

    Quoted message said:

    it a bumpy ride, but as for suggesting that cruelty lurks here I think that's a bridge too far.

    He is right. You are cruel. And you cry when you get some back.

    You want to confront cruelty? Go wander through

    Quoted message said:

    the streets in your town centre at night and look around you. Talk to the kids. Talk to the
    elderly. All around you - if you care to look - is evidence of real abuse, real suffering, real
    cruelty.

    And yet on other groups you have attacked people who do not just look at it. They attack it and do
    things to improve it. People who have fought it cried over it and worn the results home. You even
    threatend thier jobs worse than you did Ashby. You are a hypocritcal pig Edwards. And that is why
    you are so low. As the Yanks say you need a step ladder to crawl up and kiss a snakes [censored].

    And where do *you*

    Quoted message said:

    choose to see abuse in this world? You see it in me on Usenet. If that wasn't so sad it would
    be funny.

    Same as you. If you were not so sad you might be as amuseing.

    Quoted message said:


    May I suggest a mantra for you?

    Take the timber out of your own eye before you critise the splinter in anothers.

  14. (Matthew Mazerowski) said:

    To bad your an idiot and neither of the above. weasel maybe but no man.

    Matt, I expect an apology for those above comments (to weasels everywhere, not Frasier)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.