God Hates Shrimp

Alan Truism said:

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish. They
are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

2) You need to read Acts 10.

Best regards,
Bob

Alan Truism said:

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

Good!! All the more for me!

Matthew

--
I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

He *says* they're unclean, but really he just wants to keep them to himself.

-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.

zxcvbob said:

Alan Truism said:

[http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/]

Quoted message said:

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Quoted message said:

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

Quoted message said:

[http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish. They
are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

2) You need to read Acts 10.

It is SO obvious that the unclean beasts were mere symbols of non-
Jews, and that Peter's vision had nothing really to do with God having
changed dietary rules.
I mean, read verse 28.

Quoted message said:

Best regards,
Bob

--Bryan

Bobo Bonobo® said:

zxcvbob said:

Alan Truism said:

[http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/]

Quoted message said:

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Quoted message said:

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

Quoted message said:

[http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish.
They are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

2) You need to read Acts 10.

It is SO obvious that the unclean beasts were mere symbols
of non-Jews, and that Peter's vision had nothing really to do
with God having changed dietary rules. I mean, read verse 28.

God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
as a symbol.

"Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
them to Peter."

Huh?!? 🙂

--

To email me, just remove the underscores.

A liberal is someone who will give away everything
except his/her own possessions.

Bobo Bonobo® said:

zxcvbob said:

Alan Truism said:

[http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/]

Quoted message said:

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Quoted message said:

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

Quoted message said:

[http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish. They
are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

2) You need to read Acts 10.

It is SO obvious that the unclean beasts were mere symbols of non-
Jews, and that Peter's vision had nothing really to do with God having
changed dietary rules.
I mean, read verse 28.

How nice for your god and my shrimp. god hates everyone and everything, else
why would we be put here to eat each other..

--
Dan

zxcvbob said:

Alan Truism said:

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish. They
are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

It sounds to me like you are confusing shrimp with crawfish, though either
one would work in this instance.

Quoted message said:

2) You need to read Acts 10.

How you say?

"zxcvbob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Alan Truism said:

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins
and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may
not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish. They
are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

2) You need to read Acts 10.

Best regards,
Bob you need to understand acts 10 . How can a teavher teach when he
knows nothing or worse when he teaches wrong and says it is right Love
, Jack\

they are bottom feeders they clean up dead like pigs and buzzards Love ,
Jack

Jack Baun said:

"zxcvbob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Alan Truism said:

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins
and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye
eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is
in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you: 11 They shall be
even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye
shall have their carcases in abomination. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor
scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins
and
scales shall ye eat: 10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may
not
eat; it is unclean unto you.

[ http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ ]

1) Your virtual "church sign" is confusing shrimp with crawfish. They
are not the same. (a Baptist would know that.)

2) You need to read Acts 10.

Best regards,
Bob you need to understand acts 10 . How can a teavher teach when he
knows nothing or worse when he teaches wrong and says it is right Love
, Jack\

they are bottom feeders they clean up dead like pigs and buzzards Love ,

You know nothing about fish then.. plenty of fish eat off the bottom as well.
I catch striped bass by sinking a hunk of mackerel to the bottom.

--
Dan

Bobo Bonobo® said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> 2) You need to read Acts 10.

Quoted message said:

It is SO obvious that the unclean beasts were mere symbols
of non-Jews, and that Peter's vision had nothing really to do
with God having changed dietary rules. I mean, read verse 28.

God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
as a symbol.

"Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
them to Peter."

Huh?!? 🙂

The Bible has all kinds of stuff that is symbolic.

Trying to avoid my point shows stupidity, not brain power!

The point is, as I said...

God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
as a symbol.

"Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
them to Peter."

Huh?!? 🙂

--

To email me, just remove the underscores.

A liberal is someone who will give away everything
except his/her own possessions.

Pastor Dave said:

Bobo Bonobo® said:

Quoted message said:

>> 2) You need to read Acts 10.

>It is SO obvious that the unclean beasts were mere symbols
>of non-Jews, and that Peter's vision had nothing really to do
>with God having changed dietary rules. I mean, read verse 28.

God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
as a symbol.

"Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
them to Peter."

Huh?!? 🙂

The Bible has all kinds of stuff that is symbolic.

Trying to avoid my point shows stupidity, not brain power!

The point is, as I said...

God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
as a symbol.

"Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
them to Peter."

Huh?!? 🙂

You guys realize the whole purpose of the website, topic, and original
post was to comment on the hypocrisy of homophobes, right?

Alan Truism said:

Pastor Dave said:

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:58:53 -0000, Bobo Bonobo®
<[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> 2) You need to read Acts 10.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >It is SO obvious that the unclean beasts were mere symbols
> >of non-Jews, and that Peter's vision had nothing really to do
> >with God having changed dietary rules. I mean, read verse 28.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
> as a symbol.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> "Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
> so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
> them to Peter."

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Huh?!? 🙂

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The Bible has all kinds of stuff that is symbolic.

Quoted message said:

Trying to avoid my point shows stupidity, not brain power!

Quoted message said:

The point is, as I said...

Quoted message said:

God would not use the opposite of what He's saying
as a symbol.

Quoted message said:

"Let's see... I want to symbolize Gentiles now being clean,
so let Me use foods that are still not clean to represent
them to Peter."

Quoted message said:

Huh?!? 🙂

You guys realize the whole purpose of the website, topic, and original
post was to comment on the hypocrisy of homophobes, right?

God hates Larry Craig.

--Bryan