General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Glucosmine vs. Chondroitin

Started by David D. · · Last activity · 9 posts · 1,370 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 January 2005
Last activity
12 February 2005
Original author
David D.
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,370
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Do glucosamine and chondroitin have different pharmacological effects? If
    so, what are they?

    I am a 60-yr. old skate-dancer, and I have found that taking a supplement of
    glucosamine, chondroitin and MSM significantly mitigates the effects of the
    stresses that I put on my knees, hips and surrounding ligaments and muscles.

    Do I really need all three supplements, or can I drop the chondroitin and
    still achieve the same results.

    - David

  2. Quoted message said:

    Do I really need all three supplements, or can I drop the chondroitin and
    still achieve the same results.

    Why though. I just buy G&C in a big bottle from WalMart. Gluco and Chondr are
    bundled into the same pill. Do you think that chondroitin is giving some side
    effect?

  3. "MilkyWhy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Why though. I just buy G&C in a big bottle from WalMart. Gluco and Chondr


    are

    Quoted message said:

    bundled into the same pill. Do you think that chondroitin is giving some


    side

    Quoted message said:

    effect?

    I am currently taking a supplement that contains all three -- Gluco, Chondr
    and MSM. If I get down to a combination of only two, then the pills will
    be far less costly. The MSM is necessary to avoid swelling of ligaments
    and muscles from the stresses of skate-dancing.

    - David

  4. David

    You may want to check out USANA They offer Procosa II Glucosamine
    that is great. If you look at the company it is founded on intergrity
    and backed by science. Check it out it could be what you are looking
    for
    www.askpam.usana.com (go to products)

  5. "David D." <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Do glucosamine and chondroitin have different


    pharmacological effects? If

    Quoted message said:

    so, what are they?

    I am a 60-yr. old skate-dancer, and I have found that taking


    a supplement of

    Quoted message said:

    glucosamine, chondroitin and MSM significantly mitigates the


    effects of the

    Quoted message said:

    stresses that I put on my knees, hips and surrounding


    ligaments and muscles.

    Quoted message said:


    Do I really need all three supplements, or can I drop the


    chondroitin and

    Quoted message said:

    still achieve the same results.

    Use all 3 for 6 months at least..beyond a year or two in me at
    least the joints tend to pack up with too much cartilage or
    whatever ...I can feel it.. so now I take the suppliment
    maybe for 30 days a year...Im 64 and in the trades about 20
    hours a week...and engineering the other 20.

    and yes each has a different effect...the glucosamine builds
    cartilage, the msm im not sure of, and the crondotin is a
    joint lubricant.

    I went from hard to walk very far 3 years ago, to no problem
    now.

    Phil Scott

    Quoted message said:


    - David

  6. Why increase the risk?

    Facts & Figures

    Prostate cancer is diagnosed every 2 1/4 minutes, over 232,000 new
    cases are expected in 2005. It is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in
    America among men. An estimated 30,350 American men will lose their
    lives to prostate cancer this year alone, one death every 18 minutes.
    That's more new cases than any other form of cancer.

    Prostate cancer incidence rates increased 192 percent between 1973 and
    1992.

    One in six American men is at lifetime risk of prostate cancer. If a
    close relative has prostate cancer, a man's risk of the disease more
    than doubles. With two relatives, his risk increases fivefold. With
    three close relatives, his risk is about 97%.

    In the next 24 hours, prostate cancer will claim the lives of 83
    American men.

    Prostate cancer represents 33 percent of all new cancer cases in
    American men.

  7. "flacey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Why increase the risk?

    No need to be mathematically illiterate...but if you wish.

    Here is the deal, if the risk for something is say 1 in
    million, and you 5x or even 10x the risk... the net risk
    increase to you is mathematically irrelevent.

    Those that do that spin, then ignore the fact that say
    smoking for instance runs risk one in 3...now THATS
    significant.

    also these studies to not parse for individuals.. doing that
    closely, and it takes brains, so some will be able .. you can
    decide if the 3% increase is even relevant....in most cases
    its not only not relevent but the bogus spin from some special
    iterests, like the drug manufacturers trying to spin vitamin E
    as dangerous.... and well..it is... Water too is dangerous,
    if you drink more than a gallon an hour for a while you will
    die from it...and thats proven.. and its true. Its just
    irrelevant as applied in peoples lives.

    Quoted message said:


    Facts & Figures

    Prostate cancer is diagnosed every 2 1/4 minutes, over


    232,000 new

    Quoted message said:

    cases are expected in 2005.

    Irrelevant... especially world wide...and the dumb ass report
    ignores the fact that all men get prostate cancer if they live
    long enough...and that most die of other causes after
    diagnosed with prostate cancer... bogus spin you see...by a
    bunch of slime balls trying sell thier fatal arthritis
    drugs...

    Getting a clue yet or are you fronting this [censored] for the drug
    companies?

    It is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in

    Quoted message said:

    America among men. An estimated 30,350 American men will


    lose their

    Quoted message said:

    lives to prostate cancer this year alone, one death every 18


    minutes.

    Quoted message said:

    That's more new cases than any other form of cancer.

    Thats false on the face of it...given over 200 million
    american males in the us... a hundredeth of one percent of the
    US male population...get a clooooo mon.

    Those stats are *bogus...you are unable to add and subtract or
    something.

    Bad joints over 50 however is about 60% common... so you are
    comparing the two? Ahhh hopes yer drug company employer goes
    broke bud.

    Quoted message said:


    Prostate cancer incidence rates increased 192 percent


    between 1973 and

    Quoted message said:

    1992.

    Thats because men are living longer turd breath...the
    numbers are still miniscule. and for that you want to trash
    glucocamine use...? which I seriously doubt could be shown to
    increase prostate cancer risks in such a small percentile
    range with so many other factors.

    Quoted message said:


    One in six American men is at lifetime risk of prostate


    cancer. If a

    Quoted message said:

    close relative has prostate cancer, a man's risk of the


    disease more

    Quoted message said:

    than doubles. With two relatives, his risk increases


    fivefold. With

    Quoted message said:

    three close relatives, his risk is about 97%.

    oh puhleeeeze.

    Quoted message said:


    In the next 24 hours, prostate cancer will claim the lives


    of 83

    Quoted message said:

    American men.

    Thats irrelevant unless compared directly to the numbers who
    will die in the next 24 hours of all causes... prostate cancer
    ranks near the invisible trace levels at the bottom of the
    list... and you should know that. Heart disease still ranks
    first in most cases, in a hot tie with cancers of all
    types...prostate is one of the most curable and minor forms of
    cancer in men.

    Your lies and spin waste time bud...

    Quoted message said:


    Prostate cancer represents 33 percent of all new cancer


    cases in

    Quoted message said:

    American men.

    False on the face of it.

    and you have distracted from the spectacular good news of
    Glucosamine and Crondotin for folks over 40.... very little or
    no risks, so small as to be hard to measure.

    Your drug companies VIOXX though killed 200,000
    people...dead... and maimed a few million more... there is
    massive evidence and billions in law suits... not a hair split
    issue bud.

    Your drug company buddies are headed for the tank these days,
    did you know that... to survive they are trying to trash
    nutritives... amazing.

    Pure scum these are.

    Phil Scott

    Quoted message said:
  8. "flacey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Why increase the risk?

    Facts & Figures

    Prostate cancer is diagnosed every 2 1/4 minutes, over 232,000 new
    cases are expected in 2005. It is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in
    America among men. An estimated 30,350 American men will lose their
    lives to prostate cancer this year alone, one death every 18 minutes.
    That's more new cases than any other form of cancer.

    Prostate cancer incidence rates increased 192 percent between 1973 and
    1992.

    One in six American men is at lifetime risk of prostate cancer. If a
    close relative has prostate cancer, a man's risk of the disease more
    than doubles. With two relatives, his risk increases fivefold. With
    three close relatives, his risk is about 97%.

    In the next 24 hours, prostate cancer will claim the lives of 83
    American men.

    Prostate cancer represents 33 percent of all new cancer cases in
    American men.

    Thus it is wise to have a generous vitamin D intake, 200 mcg of
    selenium, rrr-alpha tocopherol succinate, other forms of
    of E such as gamma, and lycopene. Keeping the estrogen
    levels down should also help.

  9. John Que wrote:
    :: "flacey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :: news:[email hidden]...

    ::: Prostate cancer represents 33 percent of all new cancer cases in
    ::: American men.
    :::
    ::
    :: Thus it is wise to have a generous vitamin D intake, 200 mcg of
    :: selenium, rrr-alpha tocopherol succinate, other forms of
    :: of E such as gamma, and lycopene. Keeping the estrogen
    :: levels down should also help.

    Resveratrol in red wine helps also.

    --
    Juhana

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.