"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
But then your intent was to redicule and not to face the fact that sprinters can ride prologues.
That's not a rule. Some of them do. But i've never seen (well hardly seen) Steels, Blijlevens, Casper, McEwen a.o. ride a good prologue (let's say top15)
"Jeff Jones" <jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
I thought with perhaps an extra 50m lead out yesterday he would have won, but anyway, kudos to both him and Cunego. Gilbert's turning into a pretty handy rider too.
Why do you think that? with an extra 50m Cunego would have won with two bicycle lengths ahead. He came out of McGees wheel.
That's not a rule. Some of them do. But i've never seen (well hardly seen) Steels, Blijlevens, Casper, McEwen a.o. ride a good prologue (let's say top15)
What's the value to a primarily sprinter to do well in a prologue? Unless you wn and wear the jersey, I see no real value. Stay out of the way, don't fall down, and wait for your day. (If they are giving sprinter points for winning prologues, I'll change this opinion, but only then.)
They might all be able to finish top ten in a short prologue and it might mean they all would be wasting energy to do so.
Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels...
Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
On 12 May 2004 03:02:40 -0700, [email hidden]
(Kenny) said:
That's not a rule. Some of them do. But i've never seen (well hardly seen) Steels, Blijlevens, Casper, McEwen a.o. ride a good prologue (let's say top15)
What's the value to a primarily sprinter to do well in a prologue? Unless you wn and wear the jersey, I see no real value. Stay out of the way, don't fall down, and wait for your day. (If they are giving sprinter points for winning prologues, I'll change this opinion, but only then.)
They might all be able to finish top ten in a short prologue and it might mean they all would be wasting energy to do so.
Not if you can wear your home tour's leader jersey for a day...
Particularly when you're a symbol of your nation's prowess. Or want to be.
Remember Jean-Patrick Nazon scrapping for bonus seconds, and wearing yellow for a day last year?
On 12 May 2004 13:45:59 -0700, [email hidden] (Sonarrat)
Quoted message said:
Not if you can wear your home tour's leader jersey for a day...
Particularly when you're a symbol of your nation's prowess. Or want to be.
My point was in place and show, not a win. To ask why they aren't i the top fifteen means little.
I agree if the sprinter thinks he can win the prologue, he should and probably would go for it. If he thinks he could make a good showing, but sees two or three fast TT guys finishing in front, I think he takes it relatively easy.
Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels...
"Curtis L. Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On 12 May 2004 13:45:59 -0700, [email hidden]
(Sonarrat) said:
Not if you can wear your home tour's leader jersey for a day...
Particularly when you're a symbol of your nation's prowess. Or want to be.
My point was in place and show, not a win. To ask why they aren't i the top fifteen means little.
I agree if the sprinter thinks he can win the prologue, he should and probably would go for it. If he thinks he could make a good showing, but sees two or three fast TT guys finishing in front, I think he takes it relatively easy.
Put it this way: If a sprinter is within range of the leader's jersey after the prologue (by finishing top 15), then they can grab bonus seconds in the early stages and take the jersey. No matter what the competition is like, they have to go all out in the prologue so as not to lose time to the other sprinters with exactly the same idea.
But in this Giro, the sprinters were a bit short changed. They only had stage 1 to take pink before the climbs in stage 2 and 3 resulted in time gaps that were impossible to erase with bonus seconds.