Road Cycling · Public discussion

Giant Rincon vs. Specialized Hard Rock?

Started by Thunder9 Nospam · · Last activity · 6 posts · 17,240 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 April 2003
Last activity
3 May 2003
Original author
Thunder9 Nospam
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
17,240
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Looked at some bikes for me and my 13 yr old son. I've narrowed it down to Giant or Specialized.
    Here's some bikes, in order from worst to best. Any comments welcome.

    Giant Rincon: RST Cap TL suspension fork 3 in travel. Comfort saddle. Alivio 24 speed drivetrain w/
    cassette rear hub.

    Specialized Hardrock. RST Capa TL fork 80 mm travel. Altus/Acera drivetrain. Truvativ X-forge crank
    w/ capless bolts. Tektro linear-pull brakes.

    Specialized Rockhopper. Manitou Axel Comp fork. Alivio

    Giant Iguana: RockShox Pilot C suspension fork. Deore 27 speed drivetrain Rapidfire shifters.

    Giant Iguana disc. Deore + Hayes mechanical disk brakes. Double-wall aluminum wheelset.

    (Other bikes tried. Trek 4500 and 4900...the shocks seemed stiff. Kona Blast and Kona Nuni.... I
    don't like the compact geometry.)

    Regards, Thunder9

    NOSPAM is antispam

    --
    rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving posting problems, or contact
    the moderators, please see rbor.orgrbor.org Please read the charter before posting:
    rbor.orgrbor charter.txt

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Looked at some bikes for me and my 13 yr old son. I've narrowed it down to Giant or Specialized.
    Here's some bikes, in order from worst to best. Any comments welcome.

    Giant Rincon: RST Cap TL suspension fork 3 in travel. Comfort saddle. Alivio 24 speed drivetrain
    w/ cassette rear hub.

    Hmm. No, I'd say stay away from anything with "comfort" attached to it. Probably the wrong geometry,
    for one thing.

    Quoted message said:

    Specialized Hardrock. RST Capa TL fork 80 mm travel. Altus/Acera drivetrain. Truvativ X-forge
    crank w/ capless bolts. Tektro linear-pull brakes.

    Specialized Rockhopper. Manitou Axel Comp fork. Alivio

    Lots of people love their Rockhoppers. Pretty bombproof, and excellent value.

    Quoted message said:

    Giant Iguana: RockShox Pilot C suspension fork. Deore 27 speed drivetrain Rapidfire shifters.

    Giant Iguana disc. Deore + Hayes mechanical disk brakes. Double-wall aluminum wheelset.

    Giant bikes are very hard to beat for value. I've had a look at the Iguana Disc. Kinda heavy. Get
    the regular Iguana, and "upgrade" to discs if your kid insists. He'll want 'em, because they're the
    current fad.

    Quoted message said:

    (Other bikes tried. Trek 4500 and 4900...the shocks seemed stiff. Kona Blast and Kona Nuni.... I
    don't like the compact geometry.)

    Personal choice, I guess; but Kona geometry (designed by Joe Murray) is the *best* IMHO. There is no
    downside: Increased standover, longer top tube, dialed-in angles = perfect geometry. For a growing
    kid, this is exactly what you want, since you can buy a size larger than you could with other bikes,
    and still give a safe standover clearance. You'll be happy in a couple of years when he's a full
    frame size larger. Plus, Kona's are a little less common than Trek, Specialized, Giant, Fuji.

    Get the best fitting frame, even if it's plain steel with cheaper components.

    -Barry

    --
    rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving posting problems, or contact
    the moderators, please see rbor.orgrbor.org Please read the charter before posting:
    rbor.orgrbor charter.txt

  3. B. Sanders said:
    Quoted message said:

    Specialized Hardrock. RST Capa TL fork 80 mm travel. Altus/Acera drivetrain. Truvativ X-forge
    crank w/ capless bolts. Tektro linear-pull brakes. Specialized Rockhopper. Manitou Axel Comp
    fork. Alivio

    Lots of people love their Rockhoppers. Pretty bombproof, and excellent value.

    Quoted message said:

    Giant Iguana: RockShox Pilot C suspension fork. Deore 27 speed drivetrain Rapidfire shifters.

    Giant Iguana disc. Deore + Hayes mechanical disk brakes. Double-wall aluminum wheelset.

    Giant bikes are very hard to beat for value. I've had a look at the Iguana Disc. Kinda heavy. Get
    the regular Iguana, and "upgrade" to discs if your kid insists. He'll want 'em, because they're the
    current fad.

    Quoted message said:

    (Other bikes tried. Trek 4500 and 4900...the shocks seemed stiff. Kona Blast and Kona Nuni.... I
    don't like the compact geometry.)

    Personal choice, I guess; but Kona geometry (designed by Joe Murray) is the *best* IMHO. There is
    no downside: Increased standover, longer top tube, dialed-in angles = perfect geometry. For a
    growing kid, this is exactly what you want, since you can buy a size larger than you could with
    other bikes, and still give a safe standover clearance. You'll be happy in a couple of years when
    he's a full frame size larger. Plus, Kona's are a little less common than Trek, Specialized,
    Giant, Fuji.

    Get the best fitting frame, even if it's plain steel with cheaper components.

    I got the Specialized Hard Rock for my son, and Specialized Rockhopper
    w/ upgrade to Avid disk brakes for me. Everyone raves about the Kona geometry, but it seemed kind of
    "cramped" to me. Maybe that's just because I'm a rank beginner and don't know a good thing!

    I actually liked the feel/geometry of the Giant a little better than the Specialized. But I chose
    the Specialized on these points:

    1. I liked the professionalism from the store for Specialized a little better. Oh gee this could be
    a whole nother thread....

    2. The store let me rent two Specialized Hard Rocks to try out $25 each for two days ($50 total)
    and said I could apply the price of rental to the cost of a bike.

    3. They will give me better service (1 year free instead of just 90 days free) and I haggled a 10%
    discount on the Rock Hopper.

    4. I didn't like the Giant's color schemes and hey, when it comes down to the wire, color is pretty
    damn important. 🙂

    Regards, Thunder9

    NOSPAM is antispam

    --
    rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving posting problems, or contact
    the moderators, please see rbor.orgrbor.org Please read the charter before posting:
    rbor.orgrbor charter.txt

  4. In article said:

    Looked at some bikes for me and my 13 yr old son. I've narrowed it down to Giant or Specialized.
    Here's some bikes, in order from worst to best. Any comments welcome.

    Giant Rincon: RST Cap TL suspension fork 3 in travel. Comfort saddle. Alivio 24 speed drivetrain
    w/ cassette rear hub.

    Specialized Hardrock. RST Capa TL fork 80 mm travel. Altus/Acera drivetrain. Truvativ X-forge
    crank w/ capless bolts. Tektro linear-pull brakes.

    Specialized Rockhopper. Manitou Axel Comp fork. Alivio

    Giant Iguana: RockShox Pilot C suspension fork. Deore 27 speed drivetrain Rapidfire shifters.

    Giant Iguana disc. Deore + Hayes mechanical disk brakes. Double-wall aluminum wheelset.

    (Other bikes tried. Trek 4500 and 4900...the shocks seemed stiff. Kona Blast and Kona Nuni.... I
    don't like the compact geometry.)

    What kind of riding do you and your son plan to do? More aggressive riding will warrant hardier
    components. The choice of shock depends a lot on your weight and your riding proclivity.

    It's cheaper to buy a bike that already comes with good componentry than to replace inadequate
    componentry afterward. For moderate entry-level mountain biking, STX-RC/Deore would be the minimum
    acceptable rear derailleur, IMHO. For street riding or light off-road use, you can get away with
    less. For more vigorous mountain biking, you should go for better (LX or XT).

    I'm surprised the Rockhopper has Alivio components. My '99 Rockhopper came with an LX rear der and
    (what is now called) Deore front, LX shifters and brake levers. I did upgrade the fork, though, from
    a stock RockShox Jett to a Manitou Magnum R (which the '00 Rockhoppers came with) at time of
    purchase, and am glad I did.

    As for the other features you mention ("double-wall aluminum wheelset", "X-forge crank w/capless
    bolts"😉, pay little attention. All the bikes you mention have double-walled rims. What's important
    is the bike fit and how it feels when you ride.

    Van

    --
    Van Bagnol / v a n at wco dot com / c r l at bagnol dot com ...enjoys - Theatre / Windsurfing /
    Skydiving / Mountain Biking ...feels - "Parang lumalakad ako sa loob ng paniginip" ..thinks - "An
    Error is Not a Mistake ... Unless You Refuse to Correct It"

    --
    rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving posting problems, or contact
    the moderators, please see rbor.orgrbor.org Please read the charter before posting:
    rbor.orgrbor charter.txt

  5. "Van Bagnol" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:

    Looked at some bikes for me and my 13 yr old son. I've


    narrowed it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    down to Giant or Specialized. Here's some bikes, in


    order from worst

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to best. Any comments welcome.

    Giant Rincon: RST Cap TL suspension fork 3 in travel.


    Comfort

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    saddle. Alivio 24 speed drivetrain w/ cassette rear


    hub.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Specialized Hardrock. RST Capa TL fork 80 mm travel.


    Altus/Acera

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    drivetrain. Truvativ X-forge crank w/ capless bolts.


    Tektro

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    linear-pull brakes.

    Specialized Rockhopper. Manitou Axel Comp fork. Alivio

    Giant Iguana: RockShox Pilot C suspension fork. Deore


    27 speed

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    drivetrain Rapidfire shifters.

    Giant Iguana disc. Deore + Hayes mechanical disk


    brakes. Double-wall

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    aluminum wheelset.

    (Other bikes tried. Trek 4500 and 4900...the shocks


    seemed stiff.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Kona Blast and Kona Nuni.... I don't like the compact


    geometry.)

    Quoted message said:


    What kind of riding do you and your son plan to do? More


    aggressive

    Quoted message said:

    riding will warrant hardier components. The choice of


    shock depends a

    Quoted message said:

    lot on your weight and your riding proclivity.

    The shock probably makes the most difference. I'm not familiar enough with the latest shock models
    to give good specific advice. If you're medium weight (130-170 LB), most shocks work pretty well,
    even the cheap ones. If you're heavier or lighter, you'll want more adjustability.

    Quoted message said:

    It's cheaper to buy a bike that already comes with good


    componentry than

    Quoted message said:

    to replace inadequate componentry afterward. For moderate


    entry-level

    Quoted message said:

    mountain biking, STX-RC/Deore would be the minimum


    acceptable rear

    Quoted message said:

    derailleur, IMHO. For street riding or light off-road use,


    you can get

    Quoted message said:

    away with less. For more vigorous mountain biking, you


    should go for

    Quoted message said:

    better (LX or XT).

    I disagree. All Shimano gear systems, from the "bottom" on up, shift perfectly well. There is
    virtually no difference in shifting performance. In my experience, the most important practical
    difference is the bearing seals -- more expensive groups have better sealed hubs, headsets, and
    bottom brackets. It used to be that STX-RC was the cheapest group with good seals (in fact, STX-RC,
    LX, and XT hubs were practically identical). But now Alivio hubs look pretty good too, better than
    XT from 10 years ago. I haven't lhad a hard look at anything cheaper lately, but I would have no
    qualms about an Alivio bike -- even for heavy/hard use.

    The bottom line is that if you get a bike with a decent shock, the rest of the gear won't
    let you down.

    Disk brakes are great if you ride in the mud all the time, otherwise they're a huge,
    unnecessary expense.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm surprised the Rockhopper has Alivio components. My '99


    Rockhopper

    Quoted message said:

    came with an LX rear der and (what is now called) Deore


    front, LX

    Quoted message said:

    shifters and brake levers. I did upgrade the fork, though,


    from a stock

    Quoted message said:

    RockShox Jett to a Manitou Magnum R (which the '00


    Rockhoppers came

    Quoted message said:

    with) at time of purchase, and am glad I did.

    That was probably a good choice. The Jett/Quadra/Mag shocks were still a bit flexy, while all the
    Manitou shocks were at least up to Judy levels of stiffness.

    Quoted message said:

    As for the other features you mention ("double-wall


    aluminum wheelset",

    Quoted message said:

    "X-forge crank w/capless bolts"😉, pay little attention.


    All the bikes

    Quoted message said:

    you mention have double-walled rims. What's important is


    the bike fit

    Quoted message said:

    and how it feels when you ride.

    Exactly. Comfort is key.

    Remember that part of marketing is making you feel like you're missing out on something by not
    buying the more expensive model. Don't give in. Bikes are like computers -- they get better and
    cheaper every year. Buy a bike that works, and spend the rest of your money on the clothes and
    accessories that will make much more difference in your riding experience. And of course, actual
    riding -- save some money for riding vacations.

    As a famous Texan once said, "It's not about the bike."

    Matt O.

    --
    rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving posting problems, or contact
    the moderators, please see rbor.orgrbor.org Please read the charter before posting:
    rbor.orgrbor charter.txt

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, "Matt O'Toole"

    Quoted message said:

    "Van Bagnol" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:

    Looked at some bikes for me and my 13 yr old son. I've narrowed it down to Giant or
    Specialized. Here's some bikes, in order from worst to best. Any comments welcome.


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    What kind of riding do you and your son plan to do? More aggressive riding will warrant hardier
    components. The choice of shock depends a lot on your weight and your riding proclivity.

    The shock probably makes the most difference. I'm not familiar enough with the latest shock models
    to give good specific advice. If you're medium weight (130-170 LB), most shocks work pretty well,
    even the cheap ones. If you're heavier or lighter, you'll want more adjustability.

    Agreed. It's best to try the bikes yourself with your own weight and test the shocks -- ride over
    curbs, jounce the handlebars, hop up and down -- to see if they give you the level of absorption
    comfortable to you. Test-riding forks both above and below your target price will give you a basis
    for comparison.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's cheaper to buy a bike that already comes with good componentry than to replace inadequate
    componentry afterward. For moderate entry-level mountain biking, STX-RC/Deore would be the
    minimum acceptable rear derailleur, IMHO. For street riding or light off-road use, you can get
    away with less. For more vigorous mountain biking, you should go for better (LX or XT).

    I disagree. All Shimano gear systems, from the "bottom" on up, shift perfectly well. There is
    virtually no difference in shifting performance. In my experience, the most important practical
    difference is the bearing seals -- more expensive groups have better sealed hubs, headsets, and
    bottom brackets. It used to be that STX-RC was the cheapest group with good seals (in fact,
    STX-RC, LX, and XT hubs were practically identical). But now Alivio hubs look pretty good too,
    better than XT from 10 years ago. I haven't lhad a hard look at anything cheaper lately, but I
    would have no qualms about an Alivio bike -- even for heavy/hard use.

    All Shimano systems shift well -- at the beginning. It's how long they continue to shift well before
    starting to get sloppy that's the issue. Harder and longer riding in more varied terrain equals more
    shifting under harsher conditions, and will accelerate wear and tear. I'm at the point where I'm
    replacing components, and the lesser groups were needing replacement sooner.

    Light neighborhood/bike path riding on basically flat terrain is still fine for my wife's bike's
    Alivio/Acera componentry, but XC/mud/rain rides, rolling hils and climbs have caused me to change a
    lot of my bike's STX-RC and LX parts. The bikes were purchased at the same time.

    Oh, and don't forget that frequent cleaning and maintenance will keep parts lasting longer, too.

    Quoted message said:

    The bottom line is that if you get a bike with a decent shock, the rest of the gear won't let
    you down.

    Yep. Since shocks tend to be matched with the other components, if you ride within the shock's
    limits, you'll likely be riding within the level of the rest of the bike.

    Quoted message said:

    Disk brakes are great if you ride in the mud all the time, otherwise they're a huge, unnecessary
    expense.

    V-brakes are simple, light, and easy to maintain. Mud will chew up your rims, though, until you can
    clean out the rocks embedded in the brake pads and learn that submerging your wheels through silt is
    _not_ a good idea. :-) (Besides, it's not good for trails anyway -- it hastens erosion and a
    dried-up tire rut is a ride hazard.)

    In some areas wet weather is the norm, or at least inevitable during the winter months, so if you
    plan to ride hard year-round you _might_ want to consider disc brakes, but they add weight and
    aren't strictly necessary. Discs do give you better control (you can "feather" your braking), but
    ultimately it's better to try them out on a test ride to see if it's worth it to you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm surprised the Rockhopper has Alivio components. My '99 Rockhopper came with an LX rear der
    and (what is now called) Deore front, LX shifters and brake levers. I did upgrade the fork,
    though, from a stock RockShox Jett to a Manitou Magnum R (which the '00 Rockhoppers came with)
    at time of purchase, and am glad I did.

    That was probably a good choice. The Jett/Quadra/Mag shocks were still a bit flexy, while all the
    Manitou shocks were at least up to Judy levels of stiffness.

    That's what I discovered when test-riding lots of bikes (over 15 that I remember) at the time. (I
    also had the luck to have found a hilly dirt fire road and log jump near the shop for testing.) I
    told the dealer "I like _this_ bike but I prefer _that_ fork" and he arranged an upgrade.

    I was able to take home the stock bike while the new fork was on order. It was quickly evident that
    the original fork was inadequate -- it was springy with very little damping, and I can feel the fork
    top out when I popped the front wheel onto curbs. In contrast, the Manitou fork was very plush.
    Riding off a curb felt like landing on a cushion rather than jumping on a pogo stick.

    Quoted message said:

    Remember that part of marketing is making you feel like you're missing out on something by not
    buying the more expensive model. Don't give in. Bikes are like computers -- they get better and
    cheaper every year. Buy a bike that works, and spend the rest of your money on the clothes and
    accessories that will make much more difference in your riding experience. And of course, actual
    riding -- save some money for riding vacations.

    Good advice. A good pair of gloves, jersey, and shorts will make a world of difference in
    comfort, and a frame pump, spare tube, multi-tool and saddle bag will pay off the first time you
    have to use them.

    Quoted message said:

    As a famous Texan once said, "It's not about the bike."

    Ride on!

    Van

    --
    Van Bagnol / v a n at wco dot com / c r l at bagnol dot com ...enjoys - Theatre / Windsurfing /
    Skydiving / Mountain Biking ...feels - "Parang lumalakad ako sa loob ng paniginip" ..thinks - "An
    Error is Not a Mistake ... Unless You Refuse to Correct It"

    --
    rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving posting problems, or contact
    the moderators, please see rbor.orgrbor.org Please read the charter before posting:
    rbor.orgrbor charter.txt

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.