Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Giant OCR1 vs. Elite

Started by keydates · · Last activity · 8 posts · 301 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
3 July 2004
Last activity
7 July 2004
Original author
keydates
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
301
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Haven't had much luck getting this answered elsewhere, so I'll try here.
    Is it worth the extra $500 for the Elite? Is the full Ultegra groupset,
    slightly better wheels and carbon-chainstays/seatstays/seatpost worth
    the money? thanks in advance.

    --

  2. keydates <[email hidden]> wrote in news:gaBFc.62743$Jz6.31920
    @fe33.usenetserver.com:

    Quoted message said:

    Haven't had much luck getting this answered elsewhere, so I'll try here.
    Is it worth the extra $500 for the Elite? Is the full Ultegra groupset,
    slightly better wheels and carbon-chainstays/seatstays/seatpost worth
    the money? thanks in advance.

    Depends on the kind of riding you do. A fast rider might notice the
    difference. A slow rider probably will not.

  3. Here are the specs:
    http://www.giant-bicycle.com/us/030.000.000/030.000.000.asp?model=10808&lYear=2004&bikesection=8834Elite

    http://www.giant-
    bicycle.com/us/030.000.000/030.000.000.asp?dealerid=&dealercountry=&lYe-
    ar=2004&bikesection=8834&range=143&model=10769OCR1

    --

  4. I guess I should give some background. I'm a recreational rider,
    although racing hasn't been ruled out. I ride relatively fast, and for
    relatively long distances, although being on a mountain bike certainly
    impedes this. On a typical riding day, I ride 1.5-2 hours or 20-30
    miles, depending on terrain, etc.

    Do some charity rides, ie the MSTRAM (300 miles/5 days), and the
    Ironman bike ride (62 miles/1 day, haven't done 100 miles because of
    mountain bike).

    --

  5. keydates <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Haven't had much luck getting this answered elsewhere, so I'll try here.
    Is it worth the extra $500 for the Elite? Is the full Ultegra groupset,
    slightly better wheels and carbon-chainstays/seatstays/seatpost worth
    the money? thanks in advance.

    I looked at the Giant website and I did not see a full Ultegra group
    on the Elite model. I saw Ultegra rear derailleur and shifters on
    both the OCR1 and Elite. And some kind of Tru Vativ triple crank on
    both. The difference between the two bikes is a few upgrades on a few
    components that won't make any difference in the world. And the
    carbon rear triangle on the Elite compared to the full aluminum on the
    OCR1.

    $500 difference? In reality no. But the carbon Elite is more
    stylish. If having a new stylish bike gets you excited, go for it.
    You can waste $500 on many other things and not end up with a stylish
    bike.

    But if you want an objective economic valuation of the difference
    between the Elite and OCR1, there is not a $500 difference in
    performance or durability. Having a carbon rear end on an aluminum
    bike does not add anything except price and style. But the style
    might be worth the price.

  6. russell-<< Having a carbon rear end on an aluminum
    bike does not add anything except price and style. >><BR><BR>

    Reality, what a concept.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  7. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo ) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    russell-<< Having a carbon rear end on an aluminum
    bike does not add anything except price and style. >><BR><BR>

    Reality, what a concept.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

    But this was the full quote:

    "Having a carbon rear end on an aluminum bike does not add anything
    except price and style. But the style might be worth the price."

    The stylish carbon fiber rear triangle may or may not be worth the
    extra price. Bicycle buying isn't all rational and objective. And as
    long as someone knows they are buying style, and not performance, then
    there isn't anything wrong with paying the extra money.

    I bought Chorus instead of Athena a long time ago. Partly, mostly,
    for style reasons. I could not rationalize an extra $400 for Record
    style though. Although I probably should have found the extra $100 or
    so for the Record crankset over the Chorus crankset. The Record
    crankset is very stylish.

  8. russel-<< The stylish carbon fiber rear triangle may or may not be worth the
    extra price. Bicycle buying isn't all rational and objective. And as
    long as someone knows they are buying style, and not performance, then
    there isn't anything wrong with paying the extra money. >><BR><BR>

    Go to any bike shop, USA, that sells aluminum framesets with carbon ends and
    ask any sales guy what those things do. ALL will say some drivel about
    performance, weight, stiffness, complience, etc. None will say thay are there
    for style.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.