Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Ghost Bikes

Started by cfsmtb · · Last activity · 43 posts · 2,293 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
29 June 2006
Last activity
30 June 2006
Original author
cfsmtb
Posts
43
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,293
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–43 of 43
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Stuart Lamble said:

    All hail His Noodly Appendage! For yea, verily, it touches us all with
    Its divine inspiration, for ever and ever. Ramen.

    Or, as we Pirates say, Arrrrr!

    --
    daveL

  2. Zebee Johnstone said:

    The difficulty with using OH&S experience is that it is all based on
    preventing problems by preventing the dangerous activity. It should
    be clear to everyone that the obvious way to prevent cycling injuries
    is to prevent cycling.

    Taking your OH&S parrallel to this extreme, the way to prevent workplace
    injuries is to prevent work. Hmmm, but we don't do that.

    Quoted message said:

    The next obvious thing to take from OH&S is lots of protective kit.
    Full leathers and crashbars on bicycles? Why not? If it saves one
    life... After all there's lots of good synthetics about, howabout
    full knitted kevlar jumpsuits with armour on joints. Plenty of
    ventilation in the knit, so you can't whinge about that. Well
    designed armour on knees and elbows, articulated plastic ankle
    protection, armoured gloves. Fullface helmets.

    Maybe I could do with this kit in the classroom 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    Alternatively, get bikes off the road altogether. Don't mix people
    and cars.

    Not achieveable in any city in Australia. Even in Canberra you still would
    need to ride on the road, cross roads, and interact with cars

    Quoted message said:

    Of course if there's a funding crunch... Then as is shown
    in writing in Sydney, if there's a tradeoff between car convenience
    and bike safety, bikes lose.

    That's what we need to work against.

    --
    Cheers
    Peter

    ~~~ ~ _@
    ~~ ~ _- \,
    ~~ (*)/ (*)

  3. In aus.bicycle on Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:56:05 +1000

    Peter Signorini said:


    Zebee Johnstone said:

    The difficulty with using OH&S experience is that it is all based on
    preventing problems by preventing the dangerous activity. It should
    be clear to everyone that the obvious way to prevent cycling injuries
    is to prevent cycling.

    Taking your OH&S parrallel to this extreme, the way to prevent workplace
    injuries is to prevent work. Hmmm, but we don't do that.

    No, but I don't think the parallel is exact.

    We do prevent working in ways we consider have too high a chance of
    injuries.

    What's the goal of cycling? If it is to get from point A to point B
    then there are 'safer' ways.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    designed armour on knees and elbows, articulated plastic ankle
    protection, armoured gloves. Fullface helmets.

    Maybe I could do with this kit in the classroom 🙂

    Hey, you are supposed to throw chalk at them, not the other way round!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Alternatively, get bikes off the road altogether. Don't mix people
    and cars.

    Not achieveable in any city in Australia. Even in Canberra you still would
    need to ride on the road, cross roads, and interact with cars

    This is still assuming bicycles are equipment to use. IN their
    current form.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Of course if there's a funding crunch... Then as is shown
    in writing in Sydney, if there's a tradeoff between car convenience
    and bike safety, bikes lose.

    That's what we need to work against.

    Agreed. What's needed?

    The main one, the big one, is buy in from as many people as possible
    that bikes as they are currently used are legitimate road users.

    not path users, not racetrack users, but on all roads.

    And that they have equal rights to cars.

    No idea how to do that... Because it's such a huge change in the
    culture.

    Need more influential lobby groups. Employers? How to get BCA to see
    cycling employees as a benefit not a cost? Doctors? How to get
    doctors to prescribe cycling to their patients, how to get them to
    focus on the health benefits not the potential for trauma? (bet that
    has to do with power cliques in various medical groups...)

    Family First? Lobby them about the family benefits. Get the ALP on
    board too, part of a comprehensive family and employee package.

    Economists? THere's a lot of noise when local car manufacturers have
    problems, can we get noise about health, about the negative effects of
    salary sacrificing cars? Who are the economists who get invited as
    speakers to the movers and shakers and how can they be got at?

    Zebee

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.