There is no advantage to a 29; as I mentioned, my family (wife, daughter, self) all bought them, good ones, and are still trying to figure out what all the fuss was about. Don't listen to the LBS, most will try to sell you anything to make a buck and then when it does not work, it was your fault because you didn't get the setup right. Get a 26; we rode those for years and they were a blast and still are the best all around size for MTB.
My wife is 5'4", daughter 5'3' and they are riding 15-17 sizes but get the 26.
BTW the tech at one LBS I occasionally get ripped off at (applies to basically all of them) built himself a 29r; I told him about the issues I was having but he didn't believe me. After he built the bike and rode it, he sold it and admitted to me he hated it. He is 6'2" and about 300 lbs so the 29r has no advantage for a big rider either. Now this guy is a good rider so don't bother slinging arrows and saying we don't know what we're talking about...[IMG]/img/vbsmilies/smilies/duck.gif[/IMG]
Quoted post said:Originally Posted by Hev1128 [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]
We are going to do trail riding primarily....but I wanted the locking fork for street riding.
I did think the 29 seemed a bit big...but I can see it's advantages too...
Any recommendations in my price point...honestly, the skye seemed very similiar to the wahoo. The main difference I felt was the saddle.
The myka experience is hard to judge because he guy at the LBS we went to totally misfit me. He put me on a 13"....the other guy there told me I was a 15"/17" and they definitely felt better.