General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Gear - LoweAlpine Walkabout 45

Started by Flat Earth Society · · Last activity · 11 posts · 452 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 December 2004
Last activity
3 January 2005
Original author
Flat Earth Society
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
452
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Blacks have 20% off the LoweAlpine Walkabout 45, tried it on and it
    seemed the perfect fit for my frame (!)

    Only one question, is the aforementioned big enough for a weekend wild
    camping in the Lakes?

  2. Flat Earth Society said:

    Only one question, is the aforementioned big enough for a weekend wild
    camping in the Lakes?

    "It depends"

    And what it depends on is the conditions you're going in and what degree
    of comfort you want coupled with the kit you have available. It can be
    done, yes, especially in summer with a light tent, but if you want
    something bombproof in a winter gale while remaining toasty and going
    winter climbing the next day you'd want about twice the size.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. "Flat Earth Society" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Blacks have 20% off the LoweAlpine Walkabout 45, tried it on and it
    seemed the perfect fit for my frame (!)

    Only one question, is the aforementioned big enough for a weekend wild
    camping in the Lakes?

    I've got one of those. With the right kit and a reasonably minimalist
    approach you should have space to spare. I can fit camping stuff and 6 days
    food in mine. If on the other hand you want to take an inflatable lilo,
    portable barbecue, his n hers deck chairs and one of those bat a tennis ball
    around a pole type games to amuse yourself with you might need to buy 2 of
    them, one for each shoulder.

  4. Quoted message said:

    "It depends"

    Thanks for your reply.

    It does seem that I'll need to purchase two rucksacks; the 45 and a
    really big one. Perhaps purchasing the really big rucksack can wait
    until next Autumn (?)

  5. Quoted message said:

    It does seem that I'll need to purchase two rucksacks; the 45 and a
    really big one. Perhaps purchasing the really big rucksack can wait
    until next Autumn (?)

    I routinely use 4 different packs, plus a couple of different bumbags,
    all through the year: no single bag is right for everything.

    There shouldn't be any particular reason why not to leave purchase until
    you actually need the bag, or see one you like in a bargain bin.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  6. Peter Clinch said:
    Flat Earth Society said:

    Only one question, is the aforementioned big enough for a weekend wild
    camping in the Lakes?

    "It depends"

    Snap.

    Quoted message said:


    And what it depends on is the conditions you're going in and what degree
    of comfort you want coupled with the kit you have available. It can be
    done, yes, especially in summer with a light tent, but if you want
    something bombproof in a winter gale while remaining toasty and going
    winter climbing the next day you'd want about twice the size.

    As Pete says, it depends on what you take. As a point of reference,
    though, I'm currently using a 50L Macpac Pursuit for weekend trips to
    the Lakes, but I've been strapping the tent (Akto) to the outside of
    the sack as there isn't room for it inside. My sack is full, but not
    absolutely crammed tight.

    I do take a few things that aren't absolutely necessary (MP3 player,
    book (ok, so who can go camping w/o a book....??), small camera...)
    but all except the book hang from my waistbelt. I have a v. compact
    sleeping bag and a medium sized mattress. (If I take 2 mattresses, one
    of them goes on the outside of the sack so I don't count that here.)
    I take minimal spare clothing, and just enough food.

    So.... I know that people do take a 45L sack for a w/e in the Lakes,
    but I really feel it's necessary to be very careful indeed for that to
    be big enough.

    p.s. is this the sack that Chris Townsend was v. impressed with when
    he did his review of 40-50L sacks in TGO a couple of months ago?
    Certainly it was one of the Lowe Alpine ones: my memory is cruddy,
    though, so I'm not 100% sure it was this one. I think it was, though.

    HTH :-)

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  7. On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:00:03 -0000, "AndyP"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I've got one of those. With the right kit and a reasonably minimalist
    approach you should have space to spare. I can fit camping stuff and 6 days
    food in mine.

    I need to check the list of what you take, again: I remember you
    posting it in the middle of the year. I think I'm fairly careful,
    now, with what I take on weekends, but I can't get all my kit
    (including the tent) into an allegedly 50L Macpac, even with just 2.5
    days' food. I'm doing something wrong! :-)

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

  8. Peewiglet said:

    p.s. is this the sack that Chris Townsend was v. impressed with when
    he did his review of 40-50L sacks in TGO a couple of months ago?

    Yes, in all three mags I purchase, TGO, Trail & Country Walking, the
    LoweAlpine Walkabout 45 has either been recommended or #1 buy for that
    category/size!

    Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to you all!!!!!

  9. Quoted message said:

    Yes, in all three mags I purchase, TGO, Trail & Country Walking, the
    LoweAlpine Walkabout 45 has either been recommended or #1 buy for that
    category/size!

    /They/ like it, but read the full print of the review for whys and
    wherefores and try one on with weight in it to gauge personal fit rather
    than making a final (rather than shortlisting) decision based on someone
    else's idea of "best".

    For example, I don't like packs with integral side pockets rather than
    compression straps because I can't mount anything on the side (like tent
    poles, walking poles, brollies) and I can't adjust the pack volume, so I
    wouldn't have one myself even if the stitches were sewn in by the Right
    Hand Of God. Tastes and needs vary, and there is no such thing as
    "best" without context (and context can be very wide with rucksacks).

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  10. In the end decided to go a little bigger, Vango 50+10, that was in the
    Millets sale for £34.99. Loads of features for a small price plus the
    fit (for me) is very good.

  11. Quoted message said:

    "It depends"

    Thanks for your reply.

    It does seem that I'll need to purchase two rucksacks; the 45 and a
    really big one. Perhaps purchasing the really big rucksack can wait
    until next Autumn (?)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.