Road Cycling · Public discussion

Gatlin tests positive for testosterone

Started by Callistus Valerius · · Last activity · 7 posts · 427 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 July 2006
Last activity
30 July 2006
Original author
Callistus Valerius
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
427
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. OLYMPIC and world 100m champion Justin Gatlin is facing a lifetime ban from
    athletics if he cannot prove his innocence after failing a drugs test for
    the second time in his career.

    The news that the joint record holder had tested positive for "testosterone
    or its precursors" after a relay race in Kansas City on April 22 was
    revealed to the world in a statement from the sprinter himself, in which he
    added: "I cannot account for these results, because I have never knowingly
    used any banned substance or authorised anyone else to administer such a
    substance to me.

    "Since learning of the positive test, I have been doing everything in my
    power to find out what caused this to happen. I have been and will continue
    to cooperate fully with USADA [United States Anti-Doping Agency] as it moves
    forward with the process it has initiated and hope that when all the facts
    are revealed it will be determined that I have done nothing wrong."

    Less than three weeks after providing the illegal sample, the American
    equalled Jamaican Asafa Powell's world record of 9.77secs. Now the
    legitimacy of that run will be questioned.

    Gatlin previously tested positive for an amphetamine at the 2001 US junior
    championships but after it was revealed that it was contained in
    prescription medication he had taken for 10 years to treat a form of
    attention deficit disorder, the International Association of Athletics
    Federations (IAAF) gave him early reinstatement from his two-year ban but
    warned that a second violation would lead to a lifetime ban.

    "That experience made me even more vigilant to make certain that I [do] not
    come into contact with any banned substance for any reason whatsoever,
    because any additional anti-doping rule offence could mean a lifetime ban
    from the sport that I love," Gatlin added in his statement. "Since the
    positive test at the University of Tennessee, I have been involved with
    efforts to educate people about the dangers of using drugs and would never
    do anything to disappoint my fans and supporters.

    "It is simply not consistent with either my character or my confidence in my
    God-given athletic ability to cheat in any way."

    But despite the protestations of innocence and the fact he has made slow but
    steady progress as a world-class sprinter, having Trevor Graham, who has a
    long history of training athletes who have turned out to be drug cheats, as
    his coach has long fuelled the fear that a positive test was almost
    inevitable.

    "I'm not stupid," said Gatlin at the USA Track and Field Championships last
    month. "I know why I get [tested] more. It's because of the people I train
    with and the people who train me. I'm very vulnerable because of the people
    I have within my circle, and I'm always walking on eggshells. I've become
    pretty paranoid about what I take, what I eat, who handles my food. I'm
    always watching my back."

    But the engaging 24-year-old, who also collected Olympic silver medals in
    the 200m and 4x100m relay in Athens, had thus far managed to allay those
    suspicions. He has maintained that the scepticism and depression which
    clouded the sport when he first broke onto the international scene was
    enough to warn him away from temptation and has consistently voiced his
    opinion that athletes post-BALCO are a cleaner generation.

    "When we came on the scene in 2003, when we were babies, that was a dark
    age," Gatlin said when discussing the situation, last month. "The first
    question we were asked was, 'So, what do you think about this latest drug
    scandal?' But now we talk about how we can make things better for the sport
    and how we can make it better for the people who come in behind us. We want
    to make a name for ourselves in a positive way."

    He had managed that at the Athens Olympics and at the World Championships,
    he also achieved it in Doha in May but unless he can prove his innocence it
    will all have been in vain. The only positive he will be remembered for is
    the drugs test result that has further tainted the sport he claims to love.

  2. Callistus Valerius said:

    OLYMPIC and world 100m champion Justin Gatlin is facing a lifetime ban from
    athletics if he cannot prove his innocence after failing a drugs test for
    the second time in his career.

    What we don't know is whether it's an abnormal ratio and exogeneous
    testosterone like Landis or just an abnormal ratio ?

  3. Callistus Valerius said:

    OLYMPIC and world 100m champion Justin Gatlin is facing a lifetime ban from
    athletics if he cannot prove his innocence after failing a drugs test for
    the second time in his career.

    The news that the joint record holder had tested positive for "testosterone
    or its precursors" after a relay race in Kansas City on April 22 was
    revealed to the world in a statement from the sprinter himself, in which he
    added: "I cannot account for these results, because I have never knowingly
    used any banned substance or authorised anyone else to administer such a
    substance to me."

    I predict, by sometime in 2007, that Gatlin and Landis will both be
    exonerated. We will then say they are both victims of Bad Science and
    lack of due process. The more we learn of testosterone testing, the
    more we learn how unreliable it is as a marker for doping.

  4. Keith said:
    Callistus Valerius said:

    OLYMPIC and world 100m champion Justin Gatlin is facing a lifetime ban from
    athletics if he cannot prove his innocence after failing a drugs test for
    the second time in his career.

    What we don't know is whether it's an abnormal ratio and exogeneous
    testosterone like Landis or just an abnormal ratio ?

    According to AP:
    "The test on the cyclist measured the ratio of testosterone to
    epitestosterone in his system and found an imbalance. Gatlin's test was
    different. Called a carbon-isotope ratio test, it is essentially a test
    that looks only at testosterone, not epitestosterone, and can determine
    whether the testosterone in a person's system is natural or unnatural.

    In his statement, Gatlin said he tested positive for "testosterone or
    its precursors" "Precursors" is another term for anabolic steroids."

    It doesn't look good for Gatlin.

    Linda

  5. wimpyVO2 said:

    I predict, by sometime in 2007, that Gatlin and Landis will both be
    exonerated. We will then say they are both victims of Bad Science and
    lack of due process. The more we learn of testosterone testing, the
    more we learn how unreliable it is as a marker for doping.

    I think you can detect exogenous (artificial) T from a technique called
    mass spectrometry, which essentially checks for isotopes (synthetic T
    having different isotopes than natural T I imagine).

    We'll see what the tests say about Gatlin and Landis, but don't rule
    out a mysterious "third person", like alleged in Ben Johnson's case
    (1988), where a friend of Carl Lewis, Ben's rival, was seen in the same
    room when Ben was giving his urine sample. Coincidence? Or cause for
    concern?

    Likewise with Landis, is the "chain of custody" of the urine sample
    iron-clad? Or for a few minutes or hours was it out of sight of at
    least two witnesses. And was the protocol for urine samples like in
    the Olympics, where the samples are labeled by number, not by name? A
    technician seeing an American name might want to sabotage the
    Americans. Stranger things have happened (I recall many years ago some
    Chilean grapes were injected with cyanide by some Baltimore port clerks
    (it is alleged) and this caused a panic that resulted in several months
    embargo on Chilean produce).

    RL

    RL

  6. "raylopez99" <[email hidden]> solemnly wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Likewise with Landis, is the "chain of custody" of the urine sample
    iron-clad? Or for a few minutes or hours was it out of sight of at
    least two witnesses. And was the protocol for urine samples like in
    the Olympics, where the samples are labeled by number, not by name? A

    YES.

    Quoted message said:

    technician seeing an American name might want to sabotage the
    Americans. Stranger things have happened (I recall many years ago some
    Chilean grapes were injected with cyanide by some Baltimore port clerks
    (it is alleged) and this caused a panic that resulted in several months
    embargo on Chilean produce).

    blablabla

  7. gabriel faure said:

    "raylopez99" <[email hidden]> solemnly wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Likewise with Landis, is the "chain of custody" of the urine sample
    iron-clad? Or for a few minutes or hours was it out of sight of at
    least two witnesses. And was the protocol for urine samples like in
    the Olympics, where the samples are labeled by number, not by name? A

    YES.

    You can't prove this. I doubt at least two witnesses were present.

    Landis should be freed.

    RL

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.