Road Cycling · Public discussion

Garmin GPS recommendation?

Started by catzz66 · · Last activity · 7 posts · 480 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
14 April 2006
Last activity
14 April 2006
Original author
catzz66
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
480
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been looking at them. I would prefer whatever works best with
    urban streets. I'm looking at eTrex Vista, eTrex VistaC, eTrex VistaCx,
    Forerunner 201, Forerunner 301. They're all kind of pricey.

    I live in the sunny southwest and have been taking my bike with me when
    I travel. Less important=HRM, recording my route, more
    important=streets, highways, not getting lost.

  2. catzz66 said:

    I've been looking at them. I would prefer whatever works best with
    urban streets. I'm looking at eTrex Vista, eTrex VistaC, eTrex VistaCx,
    Forerunner 201, Forerunner 301. They're all kind of pricey.

    I live in the sunny southwest and have been taking my bike with me when
    I travel. Less important=HRM, recording my route, more
    important=streets, highways, not getting lost.


    I have a Fortrex 201 which works very well for me. I use it for XC
    skiing too, on my arm. ON the bike I built a foam thing on the bar for
    it. No streets and highways, but I use maps for that.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------------
    "Every day is Saturday when you're retired."

    Bob Burns
    Mill Hall PA
    (email is spamtrap)

  3. catzz66 said:

    I've been looking at them. I would prefer whatever works best with
    urban streets. I'm looking at eTrex Vista, eTrex VistaC, eTrex VistaCx,
    Forerunner 201, Forerunner 301. They're all kind of pricey.

    Yes, they aren't very cheap - and don't forget to include the cost of
    detailed maps since the basemaps only include highways and a few major
    streets, not most of the roads you'd want to by using for cycling. I'd
    suggest looking at the GPS V which includes the streetmap software
    (CitySelect) and is available for about $200 (the CitySelect maps sell
    for almost $120 by themselves). It's main limitation is a small memory
    for downloading maps of 19 MB, so it's not suitable for very long
    tours. But that's enough to hold a reasonable metro area (mine
    currently has San Francisco, Oakland (and eastward to Livermore), Napa,
    and parts of San Jose loaded. It was also enough to hold detailed maps
    for a tour down the coast from San Francisco to Santa Barbara.

    The maps include points-of-interest like businesses, parks, schools,
    lodging. Very handy when touring to be able to look up restaurants,
    grocery stores, motels, etc. It'll also determine a route to your
    destination if you want and you can specify bicycle travel so it won't
    route you on the freeway. Note that despite the "CitySelect" name, the
    maps include rural areas as well and have good coverage of the small
    country lanes that are frequently best for cycling.

  4. I like the old yellow $95 one, that takes 2 AAs, and has no maps at all except
    what you draw yourself in breadcrumb dropping mode, tracing out where you're been.

    http://home.att.net/~rhhardin4/odyssy23.jpg

    note two of them on the space-savers (plus, on the right, one windscribe airspeed
    indicator)

    --
    Ron Hardin
    [email hidden]

    On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.

  5. catzz66 said:

    I've been looking at them. I would prefer whatever works best with
    urban streets. I'm looking at eTrex Vista, eTrex VistaC, eTrex VistaCx,
    Forerunner 201, Forerunner 301. They're all kind of pricey.

    I live in the sunny southwest and have been taking my bike with me when
    I travel. Less important=HRM, recording my route, more
    important=streets, highways, not getting lost.


    I have the eTrex Vista. The AA batteries have a tendency to lose
    contact while riding, shutting the unit down at inopportune times. The
    antenna also loses satellite tracking under scant tree cover (a problem
    if you live where there are lots of trees, like the Pacific Northwest).
    I've taken the mount off my handlebars and no longer use it because it
    was just an aggravation.

    The new Garmin Edge 305 is supposed to solve these issues, as it has
    internal rechargeable batteries, a more sensitive antenna, and a wheel
    magnet/sensor to track speed & distance when there is no GPS signal.
    The downside is that it is even more pricey that the above mentioned models.

    --
    John Calnan
    http://www.calnan-web.com/weblog

  6. "catzz66" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've been looking at them. I would prefer whatever works best with urban
    streets. I'm looking at eTrex Vista, eTrex VistaC, eTrex VistaCx,
    Forerunner 201, Forerunner 301. They're all kind of pricey.

    I borrowed the Forerunner 201 from a friend. I didn't really use it for
    maps, just for speed and altitude. They aren't great for that, especially
    when it's foggy/cloudy or in forests. For knowing how much I rode I just use
    gmaps-pedometer.com these days.

    bjorn

    Quoted message said:


    I live in the sunny southwest and have been taking my bike with me when I
    travel. Less important=HRM, recording my route, more important=streets,
    highways, not getting lost.

  7. John Calnan said:

    I have the eTrex Vista. The AA batteries have a tendency to lose
    contact while riding, shutting the unit down at inopportune times. The
    antenna also loses satellite tracking under scant tree cover

    I have an eTrex Vista and I've never had the batteries shake loose.
    As for tree cover, all GPS have that problem to some extent. I
    use my GPS for geocaching and have found that it works about
    the same as other models I've seen geocachers use.

    Keith

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.