Quoted message said:I'm not going to let you and CP diminish Pre to this measure.
Whoa there big fella. By ranking him possibly as high 4th best
American runner of all time, we're "diminishing" him? Puh-leeze.
I'm not saying he wasn't damn good. I'm just saying there's a lot of
good runners in our history, and "top 3" only has room for a handful, a
handful numbering between two and four in fact.
If the category is "best male American runners of all time, all
distances" I'd probably cast two votes for Jesse Owens and Frank
Shorter and spend the next few days reading and pondering who else.
Quoted message said:Most importantly for today's athletes...he fought the AAU
Yeah, I can respect that immensely but if the category is "best
runners" it doesn't come into play. For "running hall of fame" it
weighs heavily.
Quoted message said:Today Americans love "brash" personalities in their athletes.
Yeah most do, and most also love enormous SUV's, [censored] beer, and
country singers with mullets. I prefer humble athletes and brash
Usenet posters. Or really I prefer the total screwball athlete - which
seems to have been most prevalent in baseball pitchers, like Dock Ellis
or Bill "Spaceman" Lee. (Or I guess Gabe Jennings, if we're talking
American runners...)
Quoted message said:Is it fair to compare Pre to another runner who had a career
career 2 and 3 times longer than Pre?
It's done all the time in sports comparisons, whether in bars, on radio
talk shows, or on the net. Hundreds of brilliant athletes have had
careers cut short by death or debilitating injury. Bo Jackson may have
had more talent than just about any of his baseball or football peers;
but was he the best baseball or football player in the 80's and 90's?
You're certainly free to advance your own category such as "best five
year racing spans" or "best college runners" or "most-hyped runners
who, nonetheless, in my opinion, lived up to that (largely post-mortem)
hype".