Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

FWD 'bent

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 23 posts · 1,512 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
14 March 2006
Last activity
20 March 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,512
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–23 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I too have read this claim, but I also have "seat of pants" data to
    support this claim. My FWD bike is much better climbing hills than my
    lwb TE clone. Granted, there is a weigh difference between the two,
    but I believe the more closed position that the FWD bike gives allows
    me to power up hills better than the lwb bike. It's like taking the
    tucked position of a DF rider and rotating it back.

    Rich said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm in the process of building a Front Wheel Drive 'bent, from a set of
    Tom Traylor's plans
    ( http://traylorfwd.home.mindspring.com/bike_plans.html ) and wondered
    if any of you have done this, too?

    This looks interesting, but I'm a little puzzled by the claim:

    "The front-wheel drive gives it the ability to climb as well as a
    standard bike and much better than other types of recumbents."

    Why would front wheel drive offer any climbing advantage?

    And if this is a false claim, is the rest to be believed?

    Rich

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    atombikes () said:

    I too have read this claim, but I also have "seat of pants" data to
    support this claim. My FWD bike is much better climbing hills than my
    lwb TE clone. Granted, there is a weigh difference between the two,
    but I believe the more closed position that the FWD bike gives allows
    me to power up hills better than the lwb bike. It's like taking the
    tucked position of a DF rider and rotating it back.

    Arbut that could equally be done with an RWD bike. The Lightning P38,
    for example, has a closed riding position and a rep for being a good
    climber. With most FWD bikes the comparatively low loading on the front
    wheel can lead to loss of traction on wet or skog(tm)-strewn surfaces.

    --
    Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
    Dead pigs make perfect, if heavy, earrings.

  3. Yes, I was going to bring up the P38, as it's riding position is
    similar, and it does have the rep of being a good hill climber.

    And while you are probably correct about the hillclimbing capabilities
    of some FWD bikes in wet conditions, I have never experienced a
    wheelspin problem on my FWD bike. I suppose part of this may be
    contributed to unloading some of the weight off the drive wheel due to
    a shift in the center of gravity of the bike. Perhaps I have not
    experience this as the CG of my bike is low.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.