UK and Europe · Public discussion

Fuming cyclist

Started by Mark · · Last activity · 33 posts · 1,502 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
27 February 2004
Last activity
9 March 2004
Original author
Mark
Posts
33
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,502
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–33 of 33
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Mark posted ...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sandy Morton posted ...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > As a single incident though, there are better things for the police to worry about I reckon.

    If the branch had gone through the spokes of the front wheel it would not have been a minor
    incident.

    It was a length of wood, not a branch, and it didn't go through the spokes ... it was minor ...

    There was potential for it not being minor. If the wood had hit me on the head I could have easily
    been knocked down.

    Actually I didn't originally actually say it was minor .. I said it was a single incident. It was
    Sandy suggested it was minor .. If is a much bigger word than it looks.

    Quoted message said:

    I think that incidents like that should be reported even though there may not be any thing that
    can be done. It would give a better picture to government of what the real world is like. I would
    have thought that the police would like a better view of where crime takes place and the more that
    is reported the more it looks like they are undermanned and in need of more funding. But maybe I'm
    just naive.

    I agree.

    My comment in my original reply that 'there are better things for the police to worry about' is
    simply related to the fact that in actual fact, nothing much happened. A lot _could_ have happened,
    but no-one was injured, so in their eyes, all is well.

    --
    Paul

    (8(|) Homer rocks .. 😉

  2. Mark said:

    I was enjoying my commute home tonight when it was all spoilt. A group of about 6 kids about 15
    years old lobbed a 4 foot length of wood at me. I was lucky that it bounced of my rear wheel and
    didn't cause any damage. It all happened at the junction beside Slateford station in Edinburgh in
    rush hour traffic.

    When I got home I thought it would be a good idea to let the police know so I phoned the local
    station to report the incident. The response from the police was a bit of a "why are you bothering
    us with that" type of attitude. Was I wrong to report it?

    On a similar note...

    A while back someone in a land rover pulled out from a side road causing me to brake suddenly and
    swerve. I exclaimed "[censored]" as I passed and thought nothing of it. A few minutes later he pulls up
    along side me, in the moving traffic, him and his female companion start shouting at me and he
    starts weaving about the road trying to force me to stop. I tell him to stop wanking about, but he
    continues so I pull over, he stops and gets out and starts mouthing off at me.

    I ponder a moment and decide that:

    1. He's well 'ard

    2. Theres not enough traffic to leg it

    3. He's a nutter

    4. He could duff me up and no one would know.

    So I get my mobile out and dial 999, and make sure that they have his reg no and that he knows it. I
    get put thru to the police and explain the situation as above, including my unwise expletive and a
    slightly less consise version of my assessment of the situation.

    By the time they coppers arrive, he's calmed down, his lady is looking well piseed off and I'm
    feeling very sheepish. The policeman is very polite, reassures me that I'm not wasteing their time
    and advises me to get on my way safe in the knowleadge that I will have time to get to work (5 mins
    away) while they have a little chat with the driver. He was getting into the police car as I left.

    --
    Andy Morris

    AndyAtJinkasDotFreeserve.Co.UK

    Love this:
    Put an end to Outlook Express's messy quotes
    home.in.tum.deoe quotefix

  3. AndyMorris said:


    A while back someone in a land rover pulled out from a side road causing me to brake suddenly and
    swerve. I exclaimed "[censored]" as I passed and thought nothing of it. A few minutes later he pulls
    up along side me, in the moving traffic, him and his female companion start shouting at me and he
    starts weaving about the road trying to force me to stop. I tell him to stop wanking about, but he
    continues so I pull over, he stops and gets out and starts mouthing off at me.

    I ponder a moment and decide that:

    1. He's well 'ard

    2. Theres not enough traffic to leg it

    3. He's a nutter

    4. He could duff me up and no one would know.

    So I get my mobile out and dial 999, and make sure that they have his reg no and that he knows it.
    I get put thru to the police and explain the situation as above, including my unwise expletive and
    a slightly less consise version of my assessment of the situation.

    I don't have a mobile. Maybe it's about time I did.

    Quoted message said:

    By the time they coppers arrive, he's calmed down, his lady is looking well piseed off and I'm
    feeling very sheepish. The policeman is very polite, reassures me that I'm not wasteing their
    time and advises me to get on my way safe in the knowleadge that I will have time to get to work
    (5 mins away) while they have a little chat with the driver. He was getting into the police car
    as I left.

    That must have been satisfying.
    --
    Mark

    After thinking long about a signature I've decided not to bother.

  4. Mark said:

    snip

    I don't have a mobile.

    I'm starting to get a feel for this newsgroup. Limited use of TVs, mobile phones & cars in urc-land.

    Thank God for the internet.

  5. On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:09:19 +0000, "[Not Responding]"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    I'm starting to get a feel for this newsgroup. Limited use of TVs, mobile phones & cars in
    urc-land.

    They're all at the bottom of a box in the shed[13 11/16]

    [13 11/16] yes this is a reference to uk.rec.sheds ;-)

    --
    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

  6. The bin men were round /very/ early this morning. Someone clearly felt his council tax would be
    better spent on bin wagons that can levitate out of the way of cars, as the volley of horn-sounding
    attested. Then came a Cockney cry: "Eff orf! [censored]!" followed by a dull thud. As of, possibly, a
    wheelie bin bouncing off a BMW. How we larffed.

    We wish to emphasis that attacking motorcars with dustbins is not recommended unless one is
    accompanied by four similarly well'ard donkey-jacketed accomplices. Signed: The Mgt.

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think that incidents like that should be reported even though there may not be any thing that
    can be done. It would give a better picture to government of what the real world is like. I
    would have thought that the police would like a better view of where crime takes place and the
    more that is reported the more it looks like they are undermanned and in need of more funding.
    But maybe I'm just naive.

    I agree.

    My comment in my original reply that 'there are better things for the police to worry about' is
    simply related to the fact that in actual fact, nothing much happened. A lot _could_ have
    happened, but no-one was injured, so in their eyes, all is well.

    Sideshow Bob

    "Attempted murder indeed! What sort of charge is that? "

    --
    Marc. Please note the above address is a spam trap, use marcc to reply Printing for clubs of all
    types jaceeprint.demon.co.ukjaceeprint.demon.co.uk Stickers, banners & clothing, for clubs,teams, magazines
    and dealers.

  8. davebee <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    next time this happens. get off your bike and batter them with the piece of wood.

    Than it would no longer be a trivial matter and the police would definitely be interested whatever
    the outcome.

    --
    Dave...

  9. On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:39:18 +0000 (GMT), Sandy Morton
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    🙂In article <[email hidden]>, Mark )<[email hidden]> wrote: )> When I got home I thought it would be a good idea to let the police )> know so I phoned the local station to report the incident. The )> response from the police was a bit of a "why are you bothering us )> with that" type of attitude. Was I wrong to report it? ) )You were perfectly correct to report it. ) )However if that was the attitude from the police you should - ) )Ask for the persons name and number

    Even "Enquiry Officers" have names and numbers although they don't show either.

    --
    Comm again, Mike.

  10. On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:58:52 -0000, "AndyMorris"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    🙂 )On a similar note... ) )A while back someone in a land rover pulled out from a side road causing me )to brake suddenly and swerve. I exclaimed "[censored]" as I passed and thought )nothing of it. A few minutes later he pulls up along side me, in the moving )traffic, him and his female companion start shouting at me and he starts )weaving about the road trying to force me to stop. I tell him to stop )wanking about, but he continues so I pull over, he stops and gets out and )starts mouthing off at me. ) )I ponder a moment and decide that: ) )1. He's well 'ard ) )2. Theres not enough traffic to leg it ) )3. He's a nutter ) )4. He could duff me up and no one would know. ) )So I get my mobile out and dial 999, and make sure that they have his reg no )and that he knows it. I get put thru to the police and explain the situation )as above, including my unwise expletive and a slightly less consise version )of my assessment of the situation. ) )By the time they coppers arrive, he's calmed down,

    You were lucky, he could have [censored] before they arrived.
    --
    Comm again, Mike.

  11. pmailkeey said:


    You were lucky, he could have [censored] before they
    arrived.

    He'd of been in more trouble with the bizzies:

    Quoted message said:

    🙂So I get my mobile out and dial 999, and make sure that
    :they have
    his reg no 🙂and that he knows it.

    Unless he'd nicked it.

    --
    Andy Morris

    AndyAtJinkasDotFreeserve.Co.UK

    Love this:
    Put an end to Outlook Express's messy quotes
    home.in.tum.deoe quotefix

  12. On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:26:25 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    🙂On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:09:19 +0000, "[Not Responding]"
    🙂<[email hidden]> wrote in message
    🙂<[email hidden]>: ) )>I'm
    :starting to get a feel for this newsgroup. Limited use of
    :TVs, )>mobile phones & cars in urc-land. ) )They're all at
    :the bottom of a box in the shed[13 11/16] ) )[13 11/16] yes
    :this is a reference to uk.rec.sheds ;-)

    Shame I don't geddit !
    --
    Comm again, Mike.

  13. On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:01:20 GMT, [email hidden]

    (pmailkeey) said:

    On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:26:25 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you
    know?" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    🙂On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:09:19 +0000, "[Not Responding]"
    🙂<[email hidden]> wrote in message
    🙂<[email hidden]>: ) )>I'm
    :starting to get a feel for this newsgroup. Limited use of
    :TVs, )>mobile phones & cars in urc-land. ) )They're all at
    :the bottom of a box in the shed[13 11/16] ) )[13 11/16]
    :yes this is a reference to uk.rec.sheds ;-)

    Shame I don't geddit !

    If you properly eschew jaybecks, it can be an interesting if
    somewhat odd place to visit.

    --
    Matt "A Lurker In The Shed" K Dunedin, NZ

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.