[censored] you OCHowicz

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.html

:-)

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.html

sing it brother

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.html

I think that you mean Mr. Walking Conflict of Interest

Frank Drackman said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.htmlI think that you mean Mr. Walking Conflict of Interest

Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need to
be muzzled?
Bill C

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in
messagenews:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.htmlI think that you mean Mr.
Walking Conflict of Interest

Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need to
be muzzled?
Bill C

Your muzzle and straight jacket are being hand delivered tomorrow by an LA
dominatrix. :-)

B. Lafferty said:

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in
messagenews:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.htmlIthink that you mean Mr.
>Walking Conflict of Interest

Quoted message said:

Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need to
be muzzled?
Bill CYour muzzle and straight jacket are being hand delivered tomorrow by an LA

dominatrix. :-)

\
If she's a hot hardbody brunette then I'm all in favor of it, but my
guess is my wife would object ;-)
Bill C

"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in
messagenews:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://velonews.com/news/fea/11178.0.htmlI think that you mean Mr.
Walking Conflict of Interest

Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need to
be muzzled?
Bill C

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Bill C said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need to
be muzzled?

B. Lafferty said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bill CYour muzzle and straight jacket are being hand delivered tomorrow by an LA

dominatrix. :-)

Bill C said:

If she's a hot hardbody brunette then I'm all in favor of it, but my
guess is my wife would object ;-)

I though heather was the official rbr dominatrix (in between her other two
jobs).

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

"Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bill C said:

Quoted message said:

> Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
> USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need
> to
> be muzzled?

B. Lafferty said:

Quoted message said:

> Bill CYour muzzle and straight jacket are being hand delivered
> tomorrow by an LA
dominatrix. :-)

Bill C said:

If she's a hot hardbody brunette then I'm all in favor of it, but my
guess is my wife would object ;-)

I though heather was the official rbr dominatrix (in between her other two
jobs).

Being one of the only women, HH has to fill many roles.

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

Frank Drackman said:

Quoted message said:

Time to shine some serious light into the Good Ol' Boy Network that's
USAC. Just gotta wonder when they decide that officials like me need to
be muzzled?
Bill C

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA,
etc. trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls
USAC. All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim
Ochowicz and Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

"Les Earnest" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that nomination
papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA, etc.
trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls USAC.
All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim Ochowicz and
Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

What do you suggest?

"Frank Drackman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Les Earnest" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Drackman said:

I think that it is a great time for a bunch of reformers to run for USAC
board of directors in the next election cycle. I believe that
nomination papers are due by next June and election in the fall.

Think again. You can't run for USAC board seats but only for trustee
positions on subordinate boards. Furthermore, a majority of the seats on
the USAC board are elected by special interests who make up less than 1%
of the membership, so even if reformers took all of the USCF, NORBA, etc.
trustee seats they still couldn't outvote the cabal that controls USAC.
All nicely arranged by by Thom Weisel and his henchmen, Jim Ochowicz and
Steve Johnson.

-Les Earnest

What do you suggest?

Chess.

Frank Drackman said:

What do you suggest?

A coup 'd etat followed by a good old fashioned Stalinist purge ?