Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

FSA K-Force bodge part II

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 11 posts · 425 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 July 2007
Last activity
15 July 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
425
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi All,

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Joseph

  2. Quoted message said:

    Hi All,

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Joseph


    do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
    outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
    could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
    carbon rattling about.

    but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
    shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
    aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
    together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
    outweighs new purchase.

    bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
    setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
    cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
    like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
    will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
    winning is about the guy, not the gear.

  3. jim beam said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hi All,

    Quoted message said:

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    Quoted message said:

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Quoted message said:

    Joseph

    do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
    outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
    could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
    carbon rattling about.

    but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
    shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
    aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
    together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
    outweighs new purchase.

    bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
    setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
    cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
    like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
    will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
    winning is about the guy, not the gear.- Hide quoted text -

    Crazy Glue. Really, throw it away and be happy with the fact that it
    was free -- which is slightly below the real value of most FSA
    components based on my (bad) experience. I broke my FSA ISIS crank
    and got a nice Ultegra HollowTech for $200 plus $40 for the cups
    (could have gotten it cheaper if I went internet). I know this is
    more than you want to spend (which is zero), but it is sure nice
    having a positive feeling crank with no mechanical problems and a BB
    that will last for more than a few days.

    P.S. -- I bought a new ISIS BB for my bike before learning that my FSA
    crank was broken (cracked through the splines in the aluminum insert
    that came loose on your crank). The good news is that the ISIS BB on
    my x-bike is shot, too, so at least I can use my new ISIS BB in that
    bike. When that goes, I'm switching to a cheap outboard bearing crank
    -- maybe something from TruVativ or a low-end Shimano. -- Jay Beattie.

  4. jim beam said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hi All,

    Quoted message said:

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    Quoted message said:

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Quoted message said:

    Joseph

    do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
    outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
    could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
    carbon rattling about.

    The play is considerably less than 1mm (difficult to see, but easy to
    feel) so there is no discernable gap to squirt anything into. The most
    disconcerting part is that the play is most apparent in a rotational
    direction. This leads me to think that the metal insert is just that,
    and insert, not a long arm of any sort, or perhaps worse, an arm which
    is broken.

    Quoted message said:

    but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
    shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
    aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
    together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
    outweighs new purchase.

    bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
    setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
    cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
    like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
    will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
    winning is about the guy, not the gear.

    I already have a nice Ultegra 6600 crankset on the bike. I'm only
    bothering because I can't bring myself to just throw away this nice
    shiny barely used crankset that weighs less than my current one when I
    am trying to lighten my bike.

    I know it's the guy, not the bike, but the guy (and the bike!) keeps
    getting dropped on hills, so losing weight on the guy and the bike
    helps. And if it's a free "upgrade" I'll take it. No way I'd spend
    money on a replacement crankset only to save a few grams. I may go for
    a Dura Ace 7800 but more because it is available in 180mm. But
    unfortunatley nobody has given me a free 7800 180mm crankset, but they
    have given me a damaged 175mm K-Force!

    Joseph

  5. email hidden said:
    jim beam said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hi All,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Joseph

    Quoted message said:

    do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
    outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
    could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
    carbon rattling about.

    The play is considerably less than 1mm (difficult to see, but easy to
    feel) so there is no discernable gap to squirt anything into. The most
    disconcerting part is that the play is most apparent in a rotational
    direction. This leads me to think that the metal insert is just that,
    and insert, not a long arm of any sort, or perhaps worse, an arm which
    is broken.

    Quoted message said:

    but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
    shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
    aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
    together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
    outweighs new purchase.

    Quoted message said:

    bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
    setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
    cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
    like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
    will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
    winning is about the guy, not the gear.

    I already have a nice Ultegra 6600 crankset on the bike. I'm only
    bothering because I can't bring myself to just throw away this nice
    shiny barely used crankset that weighs less than my current one when I
    am trying to lighten my bike.

    I know it's the guy, not the bike, but the guy (and the bike!) keeps
    getting dropped on hills, so losing weight on the guy and the bike
    helps. And if it's a free "upgrade" I'll take it. No way I'd spend
    money on a replacement crankset only to save a few grams. I may go for
    a Dura Ace 7800 but more because it is available in 180mm. But
    unfortunatley nobody has given me a free 7800 180mm crankset, but they
    have given me a damaged 175mm K-Force!


    You stated that the crank is not under warranty since you are not the
    original owner. Nevertheless, have you tried contacting the mfr (FSA)
    to get their thoughts as to whether the crank is repairable? Perhaps
    they could provide you with a "fix."

    You may want to consider that even if you do figure out how to "fix"
    your crank, the crank plus any repair may ending increasing the weight
    of the crankset and weighing more than your 6600 crankset...

  6. email hidden said:

    Hi All,

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Joseph

    Hi there.

    You might want to consider what can happen if that insert lets go
    under a lot of pressure like when you are standing on the pedals going
    up a hill or sprinting across a street. If this insert lets go you
    could find yourself sprawled on the road. In traffic thtat could
    result in a very run-down feeling. Is it really worth the risk?

    Cheers from Peter

  7. Quoted message said:
    jim beam said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hi All,
    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.
    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.
    Joseph


    do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
    outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
    could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
    carbon rattling about.

    The play is considerably less than 1mm

    i don't care if it's 1mm or 0.01mm! it shouldn't be there. and it will
    get worse.

    Quoted message said:

    (difficult to see, but easy to
    feel) so there is no discernable gap to squirt anything into. The most
    disconcerting part is that the play is most apparent in a rotational
    direction. This leads me to think that the metal insert is just that,
    and insert, not a long arm of any sort, or perhaps worse, an arm which
    is broken.

    Quoted message said:

    but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
    shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
    aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
    together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
    outweighs new purchase.

    bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
    setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
    cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
    like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
    will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
    winning is about the guy, not the gear.

    I already have a nice Ultegra 6600 crankset on the bike. I'm only
    bothering because I can't bring myself to just throw away this nice
    shiny barely used crankset that weighs less than my current one when I
    am trying to lighten my bike.

    how about if you knew it was planning on injuring you?

    Quoted message said:


    I know it's the guy, not the bike, but the guy (and the bike!) keeps
    getting dropped on hills, so losing weight on the guy and the bike
    helps. And if it's a free "upgrade" I'll take it. No way I'd spend
    money on a replacement crankset only to save a few grams. I may go for
    a Dura Ace 7800 but more because it is available in 180mm. But
    unfortunatley nobody has given me a free 7800 180mm crankset, but they
    have given me a damaged 175mm K-Force!

    eh? you'll ride 175 when it's free [but dangerous], but not if you pay
    for it? that's illogical.

    you go ahead and ride whatever you want. i'm 100% with sir ridesalot on
    this one.

  8. Sir Ridesalot said:


    You might want to consider what can happen if that insert lets go
    under a lot of pressure like when you are standing on the pedals going
    up a hill or sprinting across a street. If this insert lets go you
    could find yourself sprawled on the road. In traffic thtat could
    result in a very run-down feeling. Is it really worth the risk?

    Cheers from Peter

    I was wondering if there is a medical specialisation for burst
    testicles.

    Donga

  9. Sir Ridesalot said:

    On Jul 13, 9:29 am, "[email hidden]"

    Quoted message said:

    Hi All,

    Quoted message said:

    A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    Quoted message said:

    I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    it will save at most 100g anyway.

    Quoted message said:

    Joseph

    Hi there.

    You might want to consider what can happen if that insert lets go
    under a lot of pressure like when you are standing on the pedals going
    up a hill or sprinting across a street. If this insert lets go you
    could find yourself sprawled on the road. In traffic thtat could
    result in a very run-down feeling. Is it really worth the risk?

    Cheers from Peter

    Ideed not! That's why the damaged cranks are sitting on the shelf in
    my shed.

    Joseph

  10. jim beam said:
    Quoted message said:
    jim beam said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Hi All,
    > A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
    > that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
    > attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
    > holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
    > bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
    > the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    > but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    > such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    > by the bolt.
    > I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
    > leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
    > process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
    > just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
    > suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
    > so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
    > really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
    > it will save at most 100g anyway.
    > Joseph
    do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
    outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
    could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
    carbon rattling about.

    Quoted message said:

    The play is considerably less than 1mm

    i don't care if it's 1mm or 0.01mm! it shouldn't be there. and it will
    get worse.

    Quoted message said:

    (difficult to see, but easy to
    feel) so there is no discernable gap to squirt anything into. The most
    disconcerting part is that the play is most apparent in a rotational
    direction. This leads me to think that the metal insert is just that,
    and insert, not a long arm of any sort, or perhaps worse, an arm which
    is broken.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
    shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
    aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
    together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
    outweighs new purchase.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
    setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
    cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
    like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
    will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
    winning is about the guy, not the gear.

    Quoted message said:

    I already have a nice Ultegra 6600 crankset on the bike. I'm only
    bothering because I can't bring myself to just throw away this nice
    shiny barely used crankset that weighs less than my current one when I
    am trying to lighten my bike.

    how about if you knew it was planning on injuring you?

    Quoted message said:

    I know it's the guy, not the bike, but the guy (and the bike!) keeps
    getting dropped on hills, so losing weight on the guy and the bike
    helps. And if it's a free "upgrade" I'll take it. No way I'd spend
    money on a replacement crankset only to save a few grams. I may go for
    a Dura Ace 7800 but more because it is available in 180mm. But
    unfortunatley nobody has given me a free 7800 180mm crankset, but they
    have given me a damaged 175mm K-Force!

    eh? you'll ride 175 when it's free [but dangerous], but not if you pay
    for it? that's illogical.

    I meant that I would not pay money to change from my existing Ultegra
    cranks (which I bought and I like) for any other same-sized cranks
    just to save 100g. If the 100g weight reduction came for free I'd take
    it, but in this case the 100g comes at the expense of risking a crash.
    Obvioulsy not worth it. But if the crankset could be salvaged somehow
    without adding lots of weight it may be worth it.

    Joseph

    Quoted message said:

    you go ahead and ride whatever you want. i'm 100% with sir ridesalot on
    this one.

  11. Quoted message said:

    Upon closer inspection, it seems
    the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
    but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
    such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
    by the bolt.

    Not uncommon. We were sending FSA cranksets back (many carbon, some
    aluminum) at a rate of once a week last year.

    --
    Phil

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.