jim beam said:Quoted message said:Hi All,
Quoted message said:A few months ago I posted about ideas to bodge an FSA K-Force crankset
that appeared to have damaged splines on the left crank arm. In
attempting various bodges I managed to ruin the special bolt that
holds the arm on so I dropped the project. I just got a replacement
bolt and decided to have another go. Upon closer inspection, it seems
the play that is felt in the crank arm is not from damaged splines,
but rather from the metal insert having come loose from the carbon arm
such tha the arm can wiggle a bit while the metal insert is held fast
by the bolt.
Quoted message said:I was willing to ride a bodged crankset with worn splines, but I am
leery of trying something where it seems the crank arm is in the
process of separating from it's mount. FSA's warranty is specifically
just for the original purchaser (which I am not) so I'm looking for
suggestions on how to resurrect this crank set. My bike is on a diet
so I'd like to use this crankset to save a few grams, but I don't
really want to spend any (much?) money on it as I got it for free and
it will save at most 100g anyway.
Quoted message said:Joseph
do your homework on the construction. iirc, the fsa is simply a carbon
outer on a skinnied down aluminum crank arm. if that's the case, you
could inject resin into the gap between the two just to stop the loose
carbon rattling about.
The play is considerably less than 1mm (difficult to see, but easy to
feel) so there is no discernable gap to squirt anything into. The most
disconcerting part is that the play is most apparent in a rotational
direction. This leads me to think that the metal insert is just that,
and insert, not a long arm of any sort, or perhaps worse, an arm which
is broken.
Quoted message said:but but but, you have to ask yourself, wtf are you bothering? it
shouldn't have failed in the first place. it could be that the internal
aluminum has cracked already and it's only the carbon holding it
together. to be sure, you'd have to x-ray, and the cost of that
outweighs new purchase.
bottom line, unless you know for sure what the problem is, you're
setting yourself up to pay for your dentists' kids college. if you're
cheap, you're much better advised to invest in a new, known good crank
like a shimano 105. the weight gain won't kill you and the reliability
will keep your dentist merely well remunerated as opposed to wealthy.
winning is about the guy, not the gear.
I already have a nice Ultegra 6600 crankset on the bike. I'm only
bothering because I can't bring myself to just throw away this nice
shiny barely used crankset that weighs less than my current one when I
am trying to lighten my bike.
I know it's the guy, not the bike, but the guy (and the bike!) keeps
getting dropped on hills, so losing weight on the guy and the bike
helps. And if it's a free "upgrade" I'll take it. No way I'd spend
money on a replacement crankset only to save a few grams. I may go for
a Dura Ace 7800 but more because it is available in 180mm. But
unfortunatley nobody has given me a free 7800 180mm crankset, but they
have given me a damaged 175mm K-Force!
Joseph