in message <[email hidden]>, Call me Bob
(') said:Mark Thompson said:<URL:http://search.ebay.co.uk/
_W0QQgotopageZ1QQsassZleQ2dtriggerQQsosortorderZ1QQsosortpropertyZ1>
Stand by for another auction when they realise they'll need to buy
something for the generator to run.
url borked
Strictly, your software borked. There's nothing wrong with the URL as
given; it's in the correct format as described in RFC1738 in which the
URL is defined. The RFC says
<quote cite="RFC1738">
In addition, there are many occasions when URLs are included in other
kinds of text; examples include electronic mail, USENET news
messages, or printed on paper. In such cases, it is convenient to
have a separate syntactic wrapper that delimits the URL and separates
it from the rest of the text, and in particular from punctuation
marks that might be mistaken for part of the URL. For this purpose,
is recommended that angle brackets ("<" and ">"😉, along with the
prefix "URL:", be used to delimit the boundaries of the URL. This
wrapper does not form part of the URL and should not be used in
contexts in which delimiters are already specified.
...
In some cases, extra whitespace (spaces, linebreaks, tabs, etc.) may
need to be added to break long URLs across lines. The whitespace
should be ignored when extracting the URL.
</quote>
If your software does not conform to the spec, it isn't the spec that's
at fault. Fix your software.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; this is not a .sig