UK and Europe · Public discussion

Front Mech Recomendations

Started by Graham Wakley · · Last activity · 13 posts · 705 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 December 2003
Last activity
23 December 2003
Original author
Graham Wakley
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
705
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    I've been looking all over the web, and not much joy.

    TIA

  2. Graham Wakley said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    I've been looking all over the web, and not much joy.

    TIA

    Whats the problem, front mechs have a range such as 22 teeth which is the different between the
    largest and smallest. Surely you set up a front mech at the correct distance from the large ring
    (about 2mm) regardless of is diameter( which is related to its number of teeth). Does you frame have
    a braze on mount which is not close enough ?

  3. "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    I've been looking all over the web, and not much joy.

    TIA

    Sorry, some other important info:

    The diameter is 31.8, bottom pull..

  4. "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Graham Wakley said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    I've been looking all over the web, and not much joy.

    TIA

    Whats the problem, front mechs have a range such as 22 teeth which is the different between the
    largest and smallest. Surely you set up a front mech at the correct distance from the large ring
    (about 2mm) regardless of is diameter( which is related to its number of teeth). Does you frame
    have a braze on mount which is not close enough ?

    You get better changing if the curve of the mech cage matches the curve of the sprocket. Paul.

  5. Graham Wakley said:

    Sorry, some other important info:

    The diameter is 31.8, bottom pull..

    Is this a triple? What about Shimano XTR - I think that is still non-compact drive?

  6. Paulmouk said:

    You get better changing if the curve of the mech cage matches the curve of the sprocket. Paul.

    Interesting point. I have used Shimano 105 front mechs with 50, 52, 53 round and 52 teeth biopace
    rings, all on separate chainsets of course. All work perfectly.

  7. "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paulmouk said:

    You get better changing if the curve of the mech cage matches the curve of the sprocket. Paul.

    Interesting point. I have used Shimano 105 front mechs with 50, 52, 53


    round

    Quoted message said:

    and 52 teeth biopace rings, all on separate chainsets of course. All work perfectly.

    27 speed mtb triples are fussy about relative ring sizes, I suffered all kinds of grief when
    swapping a 32 middle for a 34 but my old 21 speeds were far more tolerant. However, the OP hasn't
    stated the number of gears he's running anyway, so OP, more details please.

    Pete

  8. Graham Wakley <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    I've been looking all over the web, and not much joy.

    Are you running road or MTB shifters?

    Generally speaking, you'll get better shifting on 48 with a road mech (50-53 norm) than an MTB mech
    (42-46). The curve mismatch on an MTB mech tends to force the front mech higher up the seat tube to
    avoid the tail fouling the chainring, whilst a road mech will just have the tail of the mech a bit
    further from the middle/inner rings than it already is. Ideal will be one of the old pre-compact
    drive MTB front mechs, but they are a bit rare now (SJSC have 93 XT at about £50).

    If you use a road mech with MTB shifters, the cable pull will be too much. You may be able to deal
    with this by screwing down the stops, but I've never tried it. Using an MTB mech with road shifters,
    where the cable pull is not enough, it is often OK the increase the movement per cable pull by
    clamping the cable on the wrong side of the clamp bolt. I used to use old XT with road STI by doing
    this - I now use a 105 mech after the old one died.

    Andrew (12-27 x 24/36/48)

  9. "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring


    ?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I've been looking all over the web, and not much joy.

    TIA

    Sorry, some other important info:

    The diameter is 31.8, bottom pull..

    I use a standard Ultegra front mech on my commuting/cross/touring bike that has a Ultegra double
    chainset with a 48 tooth chainring - works fine.

    Regards Simon

  10. Simon Galgut said:

    "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, some other important info:

    The diameter is 31.8, bottom pull..

    I use a standard Ultegra front mech on my commuting/cross/touring bike that has a Ultegra double
    chainset with a 48 tooth chainring - works fine.

    I have a 105 running on a 39 and also on a 60.

    John B

  11. "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    Shimano 105 seems to work with everything from 46 (the smallest I've tried it with) to 63
    (the largest).

    I've used 105 with indexed and non-indexed shifters.

    --
    Guy
    ===

    WARNING: may contain traces of irony. Contents may settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

  12. Graham Wakley said:
    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring ?

    Sorry, some other important info:

    The diameter is 31.8, bottom pull..

    Still not enough information.
    - Double or triple?
    - Other ring sizes?
    - For what gear lever (road/MTB, indexed/friction)?

    Road (and I expect many MTB) mechs can work with 48T. It sometimes helps to grind off some material
    from the cage to enable the mech to be fitted nice and low.

    ~PB

  13. Thanks for all the advice. I gave up looking on Wiggle and other shops at about 2 am, and decided to
    bite the bullet and let the bike shop do it.

    Fortunately they is open tommorow and will have it ready for 11...

    Top blokes!

    Muddy Christmas and a Hilly New Year!

    "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Graham Wakley" <grimbly@_SPAM_TRAP_btinternet.com> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know of a front Mech that will work with a 48 Tooth Top ring


    ?

    Quoted message said:

    Shimano 105 seems to work with everything from 46 (the smallest I've tried it with) to 63 (the
    largest).

    I've used 105 with indexed and non-indexed shifters.

    --
    Guy
    ===

    WARNING: may contain traces of irony. Contents may settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.