Road Cycling · Public discussion

From cyclingnews

Started by Jonathan V.D. S · · Last activity · 8 posts · 990 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 November 2003
Last activity
25 November 2003
Original author
Jonathan V.D. S
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
990
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

  2. "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

    So am I. Wouldn't "without working breaks" be against union rules?

  3. The race was to go slow. So one thing they were not allowed to do was use brakes to control their
    speed. The easiest way to enfore that rule is to remove them.

    For those who didn't read the article - Eric Zabel rode slower then Jan Ullrich for 30 meters,
    so he won.

    -Bruce

    "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

  4. "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

    "Brakes removed" would have been a better translation
    team-telekom.de031121 raab2.jpg

  5. "Tony" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

    "Brakes removed" would have been a better translation
    team-telekom.de031121 raab2.jpg

    Thank goodness the 'race' was not in the USA where the Helmet Zealots would have deeked
    both of them.

  6. "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    linking Dutch and brakes should refer to braking through backpedaling, so without handles.

  7. "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

    It was a tad ambiguous, and brakes was incorrectly spelled. I've changed it to: "...utilitarian
    "Dutch bikes", but without working brakes..."

    Jeff

  8. Jeff Jones <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."

    What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?

    It was a tad ambiguous, and brakes was incorrectly spelled. I've changed


    it to:

    Quoted message said:

    "...utilitarian "Dutch bikes", but without working brakes..."

    Jeff

    Thanks; that, Bart's and the other messages made it clear...

    Jonathan.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.