"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
So am I. Wouldn't "without working breaks" be against union rules?
The race was to go slow. So one thing they were not allowed to do was use brakes to control their
speed. The easiest way to enfore that rule is to remove them.
For those who didn't read the article - Eric Zabel rode slower then Jan Ullrich for 30 meters,
so he won.
-Bruce
"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
"Brakes removed" would have been a better translation
team-telekom.de031121 raab2.jpgOpen ↗
"Tony" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
"Brakes removed" would have been a better translation
team-telekom.de031121 raab2.jpgOpen ↗
Thank goodness the 'race' was not in the USA where the Helmet Zealots would have deeked
both of them.
"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
linking Dutch and brakes should refer to braking through backpedaling, so without handles.
"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
It was a tad ambiguous, and brakes was incorrectly spelled. I've changed it to: "...utilitarian
"Dutch bikes", but without working brakes..."
Jeff
Jeff Jones <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch" bikes, without working breaks..."
What? All my bikes have had brakes. Could someone clarify this?
It was a tad ambiguous, and brakes was incorrectly spelled. I've changed
it to:
Quoted message said:"...utilitarian "Dutch bikes", but without working brakes..."
Jeff
Thanks; that, Bart's and the other messages made it clear...
Jonathan.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.