UK and Europe · Public discussion

From CTC

Started by Just Zis Guy · · Last activity · 13 posts · 575 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 April 2004
Last activity
25 April 2004
Original author
Just Zis Guy
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
575
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In case you don't get the CTC email newsletter (what do you
    mean you're not a member? I don't know, apathetic bloody
    planet...)

    Low turnout ensures helmet law stalls
    =====================================
    Eric Martlew's Protective Headgear for Young Cyclists
    Private Member's Bill has failed to go through parliament
    today. The Bill would effectively ban under-16s from
    cycling without helmets anywhere other than in their own
    private gardens, and received its second reading today. A
    low turnout of MPs resulted in the Bill being held over
    to Friday 18th June, when it will join the back of a
    queue of Private Member's Bills waiting to be heard. For
    more information on why CTC has worked to oppose this
    Bill, go to ctc.org.ukHELMETS.aspx
    <http://www.ctc.org.uk/working/HELMETS.aspx> or tune in
    to BBC Breakfast News on BBC1 tomorrow morning at 7.20
    when CTC Campaigns and Policy Manager, Roger Geffen, will
    put our case.

    And I would just like to express thanks and appreciation for
    the work that Roger has put in on this. During the last two
    months every major piece of policy affecting cycling has
    been under review. Fitting in the Martlew bill has been a
    serious drain on resources at a very inopportune time, and
    the team at Cotterell House have been working late into the
    night seven days a week to get everything done. Doing
    nothing was never an option, and work by Roger, ably
    supported by the Usual Suspects, has ensured, for the most
    part, that the helmet zealots have not sabotaged the real
    work either.

    CTCs stance has remained calm and reasonable throughout even
    in the face of extreme provocation (for the full extent of
    this see the letter from Phil and Kevin in the last Cycle).
    I am proud to be a member of the CTC.

    --
    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    Victory is ours! Down with Eric the Half A Brain!

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    In case you don't get the CTC email newsletter (what do
    you mean you're not a member? I don't know, apathetic
    bloody planet...)

    I handed over my membership fee about a week ago, but aside
    from a form email acknowledging payment and providing a
    membership number, I've heard nothing. May be time for a
    quick call!

    Jon

  3. Jon Senior said:


    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    In case you don't get the CTC email newsletter (what do
    you mean you're not a member? I don't know, apathetic
    bloody planet...)

    I handed over my membership fee about a week ago, but
    aside from a form email acknowledging payment and
    providing a membership number, I've heard nothing. May be
    time for a quick call!

    I've been a member for 30plus <mumble mumble> years and have
    tried to get the e-mail several times but don't receive it.

    Now is not really time to moan though. The CTC have been
    doing a fantastic job on this. Geffen for President!

    John B

  4. Just zis Guy said:

    .... or tune in to BBC Breakfast News on BBC1 tomorrow
    morning at 7.20 when CTC Campaigns and Policy Manager,
    Roger Geffen, will put our case.

    Is this time definite? No way am I getting up that early,
    but I'd like to video it.

    Quoted message said:

    And I would just like to express thanks and appreciation
    for the work that Roger has put in on this. During the
    last two months every major piece of policy affecting
    cycling has been under review. Fitting in the Martlew bill
    has been a serious drain on resources at a very
    inopportune time, and the team at Cotterell House have
    been working late into the night seven days a week to get
    everything done. Doing nothing was never an option, and
    work by Roger, ably supported by the Usual Suspects, has
    ensured, for the most part, that the helmet zealots have
    not sabotaged the real work either.


    Hear hear.

    I wish we could pull BeHIT's teeth once and for all,
    preferably by cutting off their funds, to save wasting so
    much time and effort on this issue.

    Colin McKenzie

    --
    Why believe statistics? Ignore them and you can believe the
    damned lies instead!

  5. Just zis Guy said:

    In case you don't get the CTC email newsletter (what do
    you mean you're not a member? I don't know, apathetic
    bloody planet...)

    So nothing about Phil Liggett considering his position as A
    Tyrannic Helmet Row suggested he should?

    Tony

    PS Can I offer my thanks for all your efforts Guy in working
    with CTC and others to get the facts dug out and properly
    researched and analysed.

  6. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Tony Raven <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    PS Can I offer my thanks for all your efforts Guy in
    working with CTC and others to get the facts dug out
    and properly researched and analysed.

    Seconded.

    I was looking forward to getting involved, but something
    came up and took the wind right out of my sails at just the
    wrong time. Well done Guy, and all at CTC.

    Ambrose

  7. JohnB said:
    Jon Senior said:


    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    In case you don't get the CTC email newsletter (what do
    you mean you're not a member? I don't know, apathetic
    bloody planet...)

    I handed over my membership fee about a week ago, but
    aside from a form email acknowledging payment and
    providing a membership number, I've heard nothing. May be
    time for a quick call!

    I've been a member for 30plus <mumble mumble> years and
    have tried to get the e-mail several times but don't
    receive it.

    Conversely, I was auto-subscribed to it by the CTC when I
    volunteered to help with the railway station survey last
    autumn. Repeated attempts to unsubscribe have failed, even
    though I've had replies from Yannick Read (the writer of the
    emails) saying that I would be unsubscribed.

    It's now auto-binned by my spam filters.

    Quoted message said:

    Now is not really time to moan though.

    Quite, I don't think computer technology is something the
    CTC are strong on.

    Quoted message said:

    The CTC have been doing a fantastic job on this.

    Agreed.

    Quoted message said:

    Geffen for President!


    Of where or what ?

    - Nigel

    --
    NC - Webmaster for 2mm.org.uk2mm.org.uk Replies to
    newsgroup postings to the newsgroup please.

  8. On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:02:17 +0100, "NC" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think computer technology is something the CTC are
    strong on.

    And /still/ the ubggres won't give me a job...

    --
    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  9. Reply to JohnB

    Quoted message said:

    The CTC have been doing a fantastic job on this.

    They have, and they deserve all the praise heaped upon
    them, they really are a power for good for cycling, and
    for us all.

    Quoted message said:

    Now is not really time to moan though.

    Oh, go on, just one tiny one?

    Dear Yannick: I love the CTC logo. I mean, I *really* love
    it, I have it on my h*lm*t cover and everything, and I do
    keep meaning to buy the mug, honest. But is it really
    necessary to send it to me *every* week? It converts what
    could be a sensible couple of k of text into 70k html
    bloatmail, which I only ever read in plaintext anyway.
    Remember, some of us are still on dial-up. Thank you.

    [Note to self: send it actually *to* the CTC, as well as
    whinge about it on usenet.]

    --
    Mark, UK. We hope to hear him swear, we love to hear him
    squeak, We like to see him biting fingers in his horny beak.

  10. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Just zis Guy, you know? <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:02:17 +0100, "NC" <[email hidden]>
    wrote in message <[email hidden]-
    berlin.de>:

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think computer technology is something the CTC
    are strong on.

    And /still/ the ubggres won't give me a job...

    Have you sent them a cost benefit analysis to *prove* that
    they need *you*?

    A

  11. Ambrose Nankivell [email hidden]
    opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    In "]news:[email hidden], Tony
    Raven <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    PS Can I offer my thanks for all your efforts Guy in
    working with CTC and others to get the facts dug out
    and properly researched and analysed.

    Seconded.

    I was looking forward to getting involved, but something
    came up and took the wind right out of my sails at just
    the wrong time. Well done Guy, and all at CTC.

    And another vote from me. I've finally managed to find
    the time to do something... just in time to discover that
    my MP is Alistair Darling. Our beloved Secretary of State
    for Transport is in reciept of an email requesting
    information on his current stance on the matter. Should
    be interesting to see what reply I get, this one should
    be right up his street.

    Jon

  12. you know? said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't think computer technology is something the CTC are
    strong on.

    And /still/ the ubggres won't give me a job...

    Maybe they don't like Douglas Adams. My PCs, whether alive
    or dead, are called "it", "that $£^&^*&(%$ machine" or
    "Butty's Big Beige Box".

    James

  13. On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 02:32:13 +0100, Jon Senior
    <jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk> wrote (more or less):

    Quoted message said:

    Ambrose Nankivell [email hidden]
    opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    In "]news:[email hidden], Tony
    Raven <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:

    PS Can I offer my thanks for all your efforts Guy in
    working with CTC and others to get the facts dug out
    and properly researched and analysed.

    Seconded.

    I was looking forward to getting involved, but something
    came up and took the wind right out of my sails at just
    the wrong time. Well done Guy, and all at CTC.

    And another vote from me. I've finally managed to find
    the time to do something... just in time to discover that
    my MP is Alistair Darling. Our beloved Secretary of State
    for Transport is in reciept of an email requesting
    information on his current stance on the matter. Should
    be interesting to see what reply I get, this one should
    be right up his street.

    I've received a response from an assistant, promising me
    that I'll get a response at some point from him.

    My original attempt at using faxyourmp.com didn't work -
    they couldn't get through to his fax machine.

    So I sent via the parliament web-site's e-mail facility
    in the end.

    Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: gawnsoft.co.srgawnsoft.co.sr
    Symbian/Epoc wiki: html.dnsalias.nethtml.dnsalias.net Smalltalk
    links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk)
    html.dnsalias.netsmalltalk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.