Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Friction vs speed

Started by Dieter Britz · · Last activity · 6 posts · 990 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
4 May 2004
Last activity
4 May 2004
Original author
Dieter Britz
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
990
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Some years ago, I read that the force required to push the
    bike forward goes up as the cube of the speed. Is this
    correct, and if so, why? It can't be wind resistance, as
    that gives a force (for a sphere {:] ) that goes up
    proportionally with the speed. Can this be friction of the
    bearings and tyres?

    --
    Dieter Britz, Kemisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, Danmark.

  2. "Dieter Britz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Some years ago, I read that the force required to push the
    bike forward goes up as the cube of the speed. Is this
    correct, and if so, why? It can't be wind resistance, as
    that gives a force (for a sphere {:] ) that goes up
    proportionally with the speed. Can this be friction of the
    bearings and tyres?

    --
    Dieter Britz, Kemisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet,
    Danmark.

    It is indeed aerodynamic drag that exponentially increases
    with speed. Check the drag formula for automobiles out. I
    believe it is squared or cubed w.r.t. speed.

    Cheers,

    Scott..

  3. "Dieter Britz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Some years ago, I read that the force required to push the
    bike forward goes up as the cube of the speed. Is this
    correct, and if so, why? It can't be wind resistance, as
    that gives a force (for a sphere {:] ) that goes up
    proportionally with the speed. Can this be friction of the
    bearings and tyres?

    --
    Dieter Britz, Kemisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet,
    Danmark.

    Fluid drag force is proportional to the square of velocity:

    F=p/2*Cd*A*V^2

    p= density of fluid Cd=drag coefficient of object
    A=projected area in direction of motion V=velocity

  4. Dieter Britz <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Some years ago, I read that the force required to push the
    bike forward goes up as the cube of the speed. Is this
    correct, and if so, why? It can't be wind resistance, as
    that gives a force (for a sphere {:] ) that goes up
    proportionally with the speed. Can this be friction of the
    bearings and tyres?

    The force required is proportional to the square of
    velocity. The power required is proportional to the cube of
    velocity (power = force X velocity).

    So the faster you cycle on level ground the more power is
    required to overcome air resistance.

    The next most important force required (assuming level
    ground) is rolling resistance - this is related to the hub
    bearings, tyres and road surface (mainly the latter two; in
    other words normally adjusted hub bearing require a trivial
    amount of power to overcome their resistance).

    The next force required is to overcome the drivetrain - this
    is the chain and derailleur.

    As an example consider Chis Boardman's UCI legal world
    record. On a smooth indoor velodrome using the highest
    qaulity tubs available on single speed bike (without
    derailleur) over 92% of his power output is required to
    overcome air resistance when travelling @ 49.442 km/h.

    *** "Chris Boardman (GBR) Athlete's Hour Record,
    Manchester, 2000"
    ***

    Input Parameters [Metric Format]
    --------------------------------
    Cyclist Velocity [km/h] ................ 49.442

    Power Total [W] ........................ 401.2 Power Air
    Resistance [W] ............... 372.8 92.91% Power Rolling
    Resistance [W] ........... 20.4 5.09% Power Drive Train [W]
    .................. 8.0 2.00%

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Some years ago, I read that the force required to push the
    bike forward goes up as the cube of the speed. Is this
    correct, and if so, why? It can't be wind resistance, as
    that gives a force (for a sphere {:] ) that goes up
    proportionally with the speed. Can this be friction of the
    bearings and tyres?

    For fluid (air/water) resistance, the _force_ required goes
    up with the square of the speed, and the _power_
    requirements therefore go up with the cube of the speed
    (because power is proportional to force times speed).

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  6. Dieter Britz said:

    Some years ago, I read that the force required to push the
    bike forward goes up as the cube of the speed. Is this
    correct, and if so, why? It can't be wind resistance, as
    that gives a force (for a sphere {:] ) that goes up
    proportionally with the speed. Can this be friction of the
    bearings and tyres?


    No, it's wrong ;-) The force required to overcome
    aerodynamic drag varies with the SQUARE of the speed and the
    power required varies with the cube.

    Friction is roughly proportional to speed and is negligible
    compared to aerodynamic drag at race speeds.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.