Road Cycling · Public discussion

French vacation

Started by ilan · · Last activity · 11 posts · 432 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 June 2006
Last activity
28 June 2006
Original author
ilan
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
432
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. That is to say, I am on vacation *away* from France during this year's
    Tour.
    I am observing with detached horror the "revelations" in Le Monde and
    L'Equipe,
    and from what I could gather from their websites, they continually
    quote
    damning evidence (L'Equipe's headline was "Armstrong dans l'etau" =
    Armstrong in the dragnet) from the civil trial, but I have yet to find
    a reference
    to the fact that Armstrong won the case, and won punitive damages as
    well.

    Even if they did, it wouldn't make any difference, because they don't
    believe
    that there is a justice system in the USA. Of course, the French
    believe that
    their system is perfect, for example, the McMartin pre-school
    case in the USA, which changed how mass pedophilia accusations were
    dealt
    with in North America after 1995,
    was completely reproduced in France, from 2001 to 2005, and the
    official decision
    was that the French judge in charge of the investigation did nothing
    wrong,
    even though half a dozen people spent 4 years in jail despite being
    completely innocent.

    I also haven't read the full Lemond interview in today's L'Equipe. I
    would be interested
    to know whether they asked him why he failed to attend the 2003
    centenary
    celebrations, I think he was the only former champion not to show up,
    along with
    Pantani, which puts him in good company (actually there was another one
    who
    was even more ill, but I forget who).

    Anyway, I am in Montreal where I won't be subjected to the horror. I
    would be
    interested to know how beloved French cycling hero Laurent Jalabert,
    now
    TV commentator, is holding up now that his former DS is really in the
    dragnet.
    Probably very well, as the French will once again assume that their own
    heroes
    are above reproach.

    -ilan

    P.S. I went to "La Maison des Cyclistes" in Montreal today. I made sure
    to ride in,
    and was immediately told that bicycles are not allowed there.

  2. "ilan" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    That is to say, I am on vacation *away* from France during this year's
    Tour.
    I am observing with detached horror the "revelations" in Le Monde and
    L'Equipe,
    and from what I could gather from their websites, they continually
    quote
    damning evidence (L'Equipe's headline was "Armstrong dans l'etau" =
    Armstrong in the dragnet) from the civil trial, but I have yet to find
    a reference
    to the fact that Armstrong won the case, and won punitive damages as
    well.

    Even if they did, it wouldn't make any difference, because they don't
    believe
    that there is a justice system in the USA. Of course, the French
    believe that
    their system is perfect, for example, the McMartin pre-school
    case in the USA, which changed how mass pedophilia accusations were
    dealt
    with in North America after 1995,
    was completely reproduced in France, from 2001 to 2005, and the
    official decision
    was that the French judge in charge of the investigation did nothing
    wrong,
    even though half a dozen people spent 4 years in jail despite being
    completely innocent.

    I also haven't read the full Lemond interview in today's L'Equipe. I
    would be interested
    to know whether they asked him why he failed to attend the 2003
    centenary
    celebrations, I think he was the only former champion not to show up,
    along with
    Pantani, which puts him in good company (actually there was another one
    who
    was even more ill, but I forget who).

    Anyway, I am in Montreal where I won't be subjected to the horror. I
    would be
    interested to know how beloved French cycling hero Laurent Jalabert,
    now
    TV commentator, is holding up now that his former DS is really in the
    dragnet.
    Probably very well, as the French will once again assume that their own
    heroes
    are above reproach.

    -ilan

    P.S. I went to "La Maison des Cyclistes" in Montreal today. I made sure
    to ride in,
    and was immediately told that bicycles are not allowed there.

    Non-sens :

    "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters"

    Tell to every one if you want that Jaja Jalabert is a hero for the french,
    of course some can agree with you.

    However the fact is that Virenque was MUCH MORE POPULAR, you like it or not.
    The same paralel was done in the JalabertxVirenque as in AnquetilxPoulidor.

    BTW : Even the popularity of Virenque could not avoid the Festina affaire.

    Try another one.

  3. Montesquiou a écrit

    Quoted message said:

    Non-sens :

    "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters"

    Tell to every one if you want that Jaja Jalabert is a hero for the
    french, of course some can agree with you.

    However the fact is that Virenque was MUCH MORE POPULAR, you like it or
    not.
    Try another one.

    Okay. How about the full paragraph? From
    http://www.velo101.com/actualite/default.asp?Id=4592&Section=elites1

    "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters.[...]
    Mais l'été 2002 efface tout. En deux mois, l'injustice est réparée. Le
    public apprend avec douleur le choix du coureur."

    Sounds bien-aime to me.

  4. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    ilan said:

    Anyway, I am in Montreal where I won't be subjected to the horror.

    Only the belly of the beast.

    --
    Michael Press


  5. Quoted message said:


    Anyway, I am in Montreal where I won't be subjected to the horror. I
    would be
    interested to know how beloved French cycling hero Laurent Jalabert,
    now
    TV commentator, is holding up now that his former DS is really in the
    dragnet.
    Probably very well, as the French will once again assume that their own
    heroes
    are above reproach.

    And there you proof you haven't really paid any attention at all to the
    issue at hand. You try to turn it in a "French hate USA OMG", but you
    completely fail to see and admit that the French are HARD on their
    Dopers, while the USA cover up and structurally seem to allow deceit in
    sports.

    Structurally? Yes,
    Carl Lewis. I'm sooo clean even though I am caught redhanded multiple
    times.
    Baseball: Lets hit balls into orbit. Who cares if the players double in
    size.

    The French destroyed their best team (Festina), hunted down their best
    riders (Virenque, Jalabert), yet you imply they are lenient. Jalabert
    didn't dare to set a foot in France... Compare this with what happened
    to Carl Lewis^^

    So yes, a lot of Europeans have no faith whatsoever in how Americans
    handle their dopers. I for one LAUGH about the out of competition tests
    done to Armstrong. The Carl Lewis eyeopener showed that we don't have
    to expect anything.

  6. Tuschinski said:


    Baseball: Lets hit balls into orbit. Who cares if the players double in
    size.

    Dumbass -

    Errrr . . . did you pay any attention to the congressional hearings
    where Mark McGwire blubbered like a baby?

    But ya, a lot of Americans don't give a damn about doping in athletes.
    Why should the average person care? They're usually pretty doped up
    themselves (nicotine, alcohol, ritalin, birth control hormones, sexual
    performance enhancers, caffeine, you name it).

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  7. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Montesquiou a écrit

    Quoted message said:

    Non-sens :

    "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters"

    Tell to every one if you want that Jaja Jalabert is a hero for the
    french, of course some can agree with you.

    However the fact is that Virenque was MUCH MORE POPULAR, you like it or
    not.
    Try another one.

    Okay. How about the full paragraph? From
    http://www.velo101.com/actualite/default.asp?Id=4592&Section=elites1

    "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters.[...]
    Mais l'été 2002 efface tout. En deux mois, l'injustice est réparée. Le
    public apprend avec douleur le choix du coureur."

    Sounds bien-aime to me.

    Robert,

    The original post gives the impression that Jalabert was/is a "beloved Hero"
    in France.

    I said NO ! Of course as nothing is White and Black, 0 or 1, true or false,
    I never said "they hate him".

    What I wanted to say is that the French ALLWAY liked more Virenque than
    Jalabert.

    The French Justice and media took hard on Virenque (the-cheater), in
    contradiction with the Ilam claim.

    That's the point.

    (see the Tuschinski)


  8. Quoted message said:

    Dumbass -

    Errrr . . . did you pay any attention to the congressional hearings
    where Mark McGwire blubbered like a baby?

    Yes, I see the change in mentality (Balco) , but at the same time there
    is still no good system and a huge resistance from the federations
    themselves.

    On a related note, it is very worrisome that the justice system needs
    to intervene (Not just in the USA, but especially in Europe with
    Cycling). That is why I smirk about doping-controls (not just in the
    USA, though those are imho most laughable). How can it be that such
    huge scale dop practices don't show in the controls?

    pick one of three:

    1. The dope can't be found = methods are lacking
    2. The dopers are protected = the system is crooked
    3. There are no dopers, the big cases, the not-dying rumors, the
    bellringers, they are all hoaxes and strawmen

    I want to belive it is #3... but it is such a huge stretch (and it
    stretches every day!) that I personally have to dismiss it.

    Quoted message said:

    But ya, a lot of Americans don't give a damn about doping in athletes.
    Why should the average person care? They're usually pretty doped up
    themselves (nicotine, alcohol, ritalin, birth control hormones, sexual
    performance enhancers, caffeine, you name it).

    A very good observation. This is why the French and Spanish newspaper
    can go haywire: they know they will shock the readers (=more sales)

    Quoted message said:


    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  9. <Montesquiou> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...
    |
    | "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    | [email hidden]...
    | > Montesquiou a écrit
    | >> Non-sens :
    | >>
    | >> "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    | >> énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters"
    | >>
    | >> Tell to every one if you want that Jaja Jalabert is a hero for the
    | >> french, of course some can agree with you.
    | >>
    | >> However the fact is that Virenque was MUCH MORE POPULAR, you like it or
    | >> not.
    | >> Try another one.
    | >
    | > Okay. How about the full paragraph? From
    | > http://www.velo101.com/actualite/default.asp?Id=4592&Section=elites1
    | >
    | > "Laurent Jalabert a longtemps été le mal-aimé du peloton français. Son
    | > énorme palmarès n'a pas reçu la juste considération des supporters.[...]
    | > Mais l'été 2002 efface tout. En deux mois, l'injustice est réparée. Le
    | > public apprend avec douleur le choix du coureur."
    | >
    | > Sounds bien-aime to me.
    | >
    | >
    |
    | Robert,
    |
    | The original post gives the impression that Jalabert was/is a "beloved
    Hero"
    | in France.
    |
    | I said NO ! Of course as nothing is White and Black, 0 or 1, true or
    false,
    | I never said "they hate him".
    |
    | What I wanted to say is that the French ALLWAY liked more Virenque than
    | Jalabert.
    |
    | The French Justice and media took hard on Virenque (the-cheater), in
    | contradiction with the Ilam claim.
    |
    | That's the point.
    |

    So hard that he's commentating for French Television, and he was on (and
    won) "Get me out of here, I'm a star." Like Jaja, he was "rehabilitated".

  10. Kurgan Gringioni said:
    Tuschinski said:


    Baseball: Lets hit balls into orbit. Who cares if the players double in
    size.

    Dumbass -

    Errrr . . . did you pay any attention to the congressional hearings
    where Mark McGwire blubbered like a baby?

    But ya, a lot of Americans don't give a damn about doping in athletes.
    Why should the average person care? They're usually pretty doped up
    themselves (nicotine, alcohol, ritalin, birth control hormones, sexual
    performance enhancers, caffeine, you name it).

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    Don't forget chocolate.

  11. Kurgan Gringioni said:
    Quoted message said:

    But ya, a lot of Americans don't give a damn about doping in athletes.
    Why should the average person care? They're usually pretty doped up
    themselves (nicotine, alcohol, ritalin, birth control hormones, sexual
    performance enhancers, caffeine, you name it).

    yeahyeah said:

    Don't forget chocolate.

    Salmonella chocolate is even better for cyclists. Helps the diet plan.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.