France and the French was Re: Big Disappointment: Polar S720i Heart Rate Monitor



"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> R Brickston wrote:
>> ...
>> So, do you think that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is mentally stable enough to
>> possess The Bomb?

>
> If Allen Dulles, at the request of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (a
> predecessor to BP), had not engineered a coup that removed the
> democratic Mossadegh government and replaced it with the brutal and
> repressive regime of Reza Mohammad Shah Pahlavi, Iran would likely be a
> true democracy now, instead of a country effectively run by a small
> group of Shia clerics.


The Shah was in the process of Westernizing and democratizing Iran. He was
not nearly repressive enough in my opinion as he should have put down the
mullahs without mercy.

> Of course it was the Iranians' fault for being upset that 85% of the
> profits from hydrocarbon extraction were going to the British, leaving
> 15% for Iran, and having the temerity to do something about it.


The West should have taken over all the Middle Eastern oil fields by
military force. To have left these resources in the hands of Arab thugs was
a huge mistake. We see the same scenario playing out now in Venezuela where
the resident thug (Chavez) is waxing eloquent due to his oil profits. The
West badly needs to get off the oil ***, that is for sure.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Padre" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Edward Dolan skrev:
>
>> No, you confounded idiot, the French will not defend Western Civilization
>> and that is why they are despicable.

>
> Ohhh maaan - stop stop stop, I'm laughing too hard, this is just not
> good for me.


Yes, that is what happens when you sell your soul to the Devil in order to
have some business with Arab thugs. The French are basically swine and all
Europeans know this even if some Americans don't. They not only facilitate
Muslim extremism, but they are anti-Israel, This fits right in with their
notorious anti-Semitism. Anyone who does not hate the g.d. French is crazy.
Hells Bells, even the French hate the French!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, that is what happens when you sell your soul to the Devil


are you on cheap booze, drugs, or just a congenital idiot?
or maybe all of the above. what you say doesn't make any sense.
a clod proud of it and broadcasting it all over by cross-posting.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> No one in this world gives a good god damn


stupid mongrel, so now you're speaking for the all world?!
your condition is getting worse by the day.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***
 
M. Bakunin wrote:

> are you on cheap booze, drugs, or just a congenital idiot?


special ed brothel? tsk-tsk.
 
"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is what happens when you sell your soul to the Devil

>
> are you on cheap booze, drugs, or just a congenital idiot?
> or maybe all of the above. what you say doesn't make any sense.
> a clod proud of it and broadcasting it all over by cross-posting.



The English (uk.rec.cycling) are always interested in what the Great Ed
Dolan thinks of the French, their eternal enemy from time immemorial.

I will never make any sense to you because you cannot read any better than
you can write. I will began to pay some attention to you if and when you
write properly using capital letters where required and if and when you
explain your despicable anarchist user name.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No one in this world gives a good god damn

>
> stupid mongrel, so now you're speaking for the all world?!
> your condition is getting worse by the day.


Yup, there is no one here except us anarchists!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I will never make any sense to you because you cannot read any better than
> you can write. I will began to pay some attention to you if and when you
> write properly using capital letters where required and if and when you
> explain your despicable anarchist user name.


my poor retard, that's the best you can come up with?

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***
 
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:23:52 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

>R Brickston wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:11:53 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> R Brickston wrote:

>>
>>> Bill Baka

>> What was it you wrote a day or two ago? That you killfiled me and you
>> "really mean it this time." Doofus cubed.

>
>You are kill filed but it works different in Thunderbird than any other
>software. It marks you as read and I have the option of dropping out and
>it eliminates you. Sometimes I just read some of your posts to see how
>lame they are and reply. To your honor, I un-kill-filed Dolan because I
>found him 'LESS' offensive than you.


Look, Doofus, we need /detailed/ answers here, quitting glossing over
it.
 
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:20:16 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

>R Brickston wrote:
>> Here's a clue for you: The Sun is 93,000,000 mile away. How are yuou
>> going get there?

>
>Rocket, dumb ass. If we can send probes clear out of the solar system we
>can sure as hell fire one into the sun.


Did you hear that the King of Planet Baka was going to send a manned
mission into outer space? He calls up NASA for some pointers and they
ask where the mission is and he tells them the Sun.

NASA says, "You can't send a manned mission to the Sun, the crew will
burn up."

King Baka replies, "No, were going at night."
 
Bill Baka wrote on 02/09/2006 01:27 +0100:
>
> Use a rocket, not that waste they call a shuttle. That thing has been a
> farce since day one. I would gladly sit in a capsule on top of a Saturn
> V rocket, but not in a shuttle.
> Bill Baka


There have only ever been 13 Saturn V launchs , one of which (Apollo 6)
had some significant launch problems. Compare that with 115 shuttle
launches with one launch vehicle failure and you have nowhere near
enough data to know if the Saturn V is more or less reliable than the
Shuttle.

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
Simon Brooke wrote on 02/09/2006 08:37 +0100:
>
> The latter. Killfile him; he's a well-known attention-seeking prat.
>


Is that a euphemism for Troll?

--
Tony

"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
 
Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
>


....

>
> So, you want to keep all the Plutonium for bombs then?
> I don't think a reactor would run too stably on Plutonium.
> Hell, I don't know if there is a use for it besides bombs.
> That's one for you too Google, smart ass, since I am not.
> Bill Baka


Would this be another technology you know nothing about, but aren't afraid
to express an uninformed opinion on?

Don't look now, bubba, but the French (yep, the FRENCH) and Japanese are
doing it big time, the US is trying to do it in the near-term future to
burn off all that Pu the taxpayers are now paying to store safely, and most
reactors do it at the end-of-life of fuel elements; the spectrum shifts to
the fast side, but it's doable and profitable in the US as there's no
reprocessing there and all that Pu would just go to waste.

BTW, it's the FRENCH who are building the US MOX plant right now using US
taxpayer money in an effort by the US government to get the Russians to
build a plant to burn up their slightly more proliferation-prone stockpile.
The US has no doable MOX technology seeing as Jimmy-Bob Carter murdered the
US industry because of his KEEN insights as a nu-ku-lar engineer. That and
his ability to see UFOs, presumably.
 
R Brickston wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:20:16 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> R Brickston wrote:
>>> Here's a clue for you: The Sun is 93,000,000 mile away. How are yuou
>>> going get there?

>> Rocket, dumb ass. If we can send probes clear out of the solar system we
>> can sure as hell fire one into the sun.

>
> Did you hear that the King of Planet Baka was going to send a manned
> mission into outer space? He calls up NASA for some pointers and they
> ask where the mission is and he tells them the Sun.
>
> NASA says, "You can't send a manned mission to the Sun, the crew will
> burn up."
>
> King Baka replies, "No, were going at night."


Dude,
You been doing too many drugs.
Bill Baka
 
Tony Raven wrote:
> Bill Baka wrote on 02/09/2006 01:27 +0100:
>>
>> Use a rocket, not that waste they call a shuttle. That thing has been
>> a farce since day one. I would gladly sit in a capsule on top of a
>> Saturn V rocket, but not in a shuttle.
>> Bill Baka

>
> There have only ever been 13 Saturn V launchs , one of which (Apollo 6)
> had some significant launch problems. Compare that with 115 shuttle
> launches with one launch vehicle failure and you have nowhere near
> enough data to know if the Saturn V is more or less reliable than the
> Shuttle.
>

I don't think one ever blew up and for a disposal mission there would be
no need to send up people. That was just an example anyway since there
are now plenty of reliable international rockets available. Using the
shuttle to take up small pieces of the space station is a waste, where a
really heavy lift vehicle like the Saturn could do the work of maybe 20
shuttle missions, more if they put SRB's on it.
The shuttle is showmanship at this point, and NASA really wants to
replace it.
Bill Baka
 
wvantwiller wrote:
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
> ...
>
>> So, you want to keep all the Plutonium for bombs then?
>> I don't think a reactor would run too stably on Plutonium.
>> Hell, I don't know if there is a use for it besides bombs.
>> That's one for you too Google, smart ass, since I am not.
>> Bill Baka

>
> Would this be another technology you know nothing about, but aren't afraid
> to express an uninformed opinion on?


I NEVER said I was a reactor engineer, just that if we get rid of the
Plutonium it would be a whole lot harder to build a nuclear bomb.
>
> Don't look now, bubba, but the French (yep, the FRENCH) and Japanese are
> doing it big time, the US is trying to do it in the near-term future to
> burn off all that Pu the taxpayers are now paying to store safely, and most
> reactors do it at the end-of-life of fuel elements; the spectrum shifts to
> the fast side, but it's doable and profitable in the US as there's no
> reprocessing there and all that Pu would just go to waste.


Yeah,
Breeder reactor versus pure power generator reactors. The problem is
with public nuclear paranoia and the fact that the government has not
put much effort (that I know of) into building a modern, computerized,
triple redundant, foolproof, reactor.
>
> BTW, it's the FRENCH who are building the US MOX plant right now using US
> taxpayer money in an effort by the US government to get the Russians to
> build a plant to burn up their slightly more proliferation-prone stockpile.
> The US has no doable MOX technology seeing as Jimmy-Bob Carter murdered the
> US industry because of his KEEN insights as a nu-ku-lar engineer. That and
> his ability to see UFOs, presumably.


I know, hence the above comment. Since when do we let the French get
ahead of us? We'll never hear the end of it from the French.
Bill Baka
 
R Brickston wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:31:40 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The English lately are not much better than the French and deserve whatever
> >> the Islamist Jihadists decide to do to them.

> >
> >stupid mongrel. if you use the extremists' attacks as a scale to judge
> >how bad a country is, yours gets the gold medal. after all, they knock
> >down 2 towers and 3000+ people.

>
> So, you approve of the action on Sept. 11?


I greatly approve of the actions of September 11, 1906, when Mohandas
Gandhi first used his methodology of Satyagraha (non-violent protest).

--
Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain
 
Bill Baka wrote:
> ...Hell, I don't know if there is a use for it [plutonium] besides bombs....


BICYCLE FRAMES!

--
Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain
 
On 2 Sep 2006 11:36:16 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>R Brickston wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:31:40 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The English lately are not much better than the French and deserve whatever
>> >> the Islamist Jihadists decide to do to them.
>> >
>> >stupid mongrel. if you use the extremists' attacks as a scale to judge
>> >how bad a country is, yours gets the gold medal. after all, they knock
>> >down 2 towers and 3000+ people.

>>
>> So, you approve of the action on Sept. 11?

>
>I greatly approve of the actions of September 11, 1906, when Mohandas
>Gandhi first used his methodology of Satyagraha (non-violent protest).


Gosh, if we had only used that methodology against the Japanese and
****** in WWII. Think of all the lives it would have saved.