UK and Europe · Public discussion

Frame Size: Go Large or Small?

Started by Simonb · · Last activity · 6 posts · 563 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 May 2004
Last activity
30 May 2004
Original author
Simonb
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
563
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame
    I'm going for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go for
    58cm or 60cm?

  2. Simonb said:

    I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame
    I'm going for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go
    for 58cm or 60cm?

    58 with a decent seat post. It'll be lighter and stiffer,
    and more comfortable to stand astride.

    --
    Mark.

  3. Simonb <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame
    : I'm going for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go
    : for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    I think modern bikes are best sized by the reach to the bars
    and the drop from saddle to bars. Seattube length is pretty
    irrelevant given the range of seatposts available but if you
    get a smaller frame and can't get the bars high enough,
    you'll suffer. Ditto if you get one too big and can't get
    them low enough.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  4. Arthur Clune said:
    Simonb said:

    I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame
    I'm going for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go
    for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    Inside leg * 0.65.

  5. Simonb said:
    Arthur Clune said:

    Simonb <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame
    I'm going for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go
    for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    Inside leg * 0.65.

    Hmm....... educated guess, more or less.

    See competitivecyclist.comcompetitivecyclist.com

    for more accurate measurament. Even then it's not exact
    science, the best way to do it is to go to a shop that fits
    it for you. That way you can feel what's more
    comfortable.....

  6. BrakePiston said:
    Simonb said:
    Arthur Clune said:

    Simonb <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame
    >I'm going for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go
    >for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    Inside leg * 0.65.

    Hmm....... educated guess, more or less.

    See competitivecyclist.comcompetitivecyclist.com

    for more accurate measurament. Even then it's not exact
    science, the best way to do it is to go to a shop that
    fits it for you. That way you can feel what's more
    comfortable.....


    If you are spending a fair amount then my advice would be to
    get yourself measured by a shop that has Bioracer equipment.
    Look at bikefitting.combikefitting.com Its well worth the money.
    Otherwise I would always go for a frame that was slightly
    small as you can make adjustments with stem etc. If you get
    one too big you're stuffed.

    Stan Cox

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.