UK and Europe · Public discussion

Frame Size: Go Large or Small?

Started by Simonb · · Last activity · 6 posts · 449 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
28 May 2004
Last activity
28 May 2004
Original author
Simonb
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
449
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame I'm going for goes
    up in 2cm increments. So should I go for 58cm or 60cm?

  2. Simonb said:

    I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame I'm going for goes
    up in 2cm increments. So should I go for 58cm or 60cm?

    58 with a decent seat post. It'll be lighter and stiffer, and more
    comfortable to stand astride.

    --
    Mark.

  3. Simonb <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame I'm going for goes
    : up in 2cm increments. So should I go for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    I think modern bikes are best sized by the reach to the bars and the drop
    from saddle to bars. Seattube length is pretty irrelevant given the range
    of seatposts available but if you get a smaller frame and can't get the
    bars high enough, you'll suffer. Ditto if you get one too big and can't
    get them low enough.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune http://www.clune.org
    "Technolibertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  4. Arthur Clune said:
    Simonb said:

    I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame I'm going
    for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    Inside leg * 0.65.

  5. Simonb said:
    Arthur Clune said:
    Simonb said:

    I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame I'm going
    for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    Inside leg * 0.65.

    Hmm....... educated guess, more or less.

    See
    http://www.competitivecyclist.com/

    for more accurate measurament. Even then it's not exact science, the
    best way to do it is to go to a shop that fits it for you. That way
    you can feel what's more comfortable.....

  6. BrakePiston said:
    Simonb said:
    Arthur Clune said:

    Simonb <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >I've worked out my frame size to be 59cm (C-C) The frame I'm going
    >for goes up in 2cm increments. So should I go for 58cm or 60cm?

    How did you work the size out?

    Inside leg * 0.65.

    Hmm....... educated guess, more or less.

    See
    http://www.competitivecyclist.com/

    for more accurate measurament. Even then it's not exact science, the
    best way to do it is to go to a shop that fits it for you. That way
    you can feel what's more comfortable.....


    If you are spending a fair amount then my advice would be to get
    yourself measured by a shop that has Bioracer equipment. Look at
    http://www.bikefitting.com Its well worth the money. Otherwise I would
    always go for a frame that was slightly small as you can make
    adjustments with stem etc. If you get one too big you're stuffed.

    Stan Cox

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.