http://80.53.169.26/puti/foto2.JPG
greetings,
--
bartek be
url: http://ckf.kielce4u.com/
mail: http://tinyurl.com/shvq
blog: http://stirlitz.blog.as/
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
http://80.53.169.26/puti/foto2.JPG
greetings,
--
bartek be
url: http://ckf.kielce4u.com/
mail: http://tinyurl.com/shvq
blog: http://stirlitz.blog.as/
that is good. 😄
a coupla tips, re-size the pic in PhotoShop and post it to
www.farkin.ne
they will love it!!
BTW, did your friend land it safely? 😄 😄 :
-
bartek be wrote:
:: http://80.53.169.26/puti/foto2.JPG
::
:: greetings,
::
:: --
::
:: bartek be
:: url: http://ckf.kielce4u.com/
:: mail: http://tinyurl.com/shvq
:: blog: http://stirlitz.blog.as/
ALL,
it's about 3MB to d/l the image. I have crunched it to 101kB if you want it
in my reply to this post.
Jock
U¿ytkownik "cfsmtb" <[email hidden]> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:BTW, did your friend land it safely? 😄 😄 😄
he didn't land safety head on floor in hospital, 25 years ago, when his
mother born him :P
but now he's fine and says that landing was calm
some details:
rider: Piccolo MTB Kielce Poland
height: 3,5 m
foto: Qba Bike Team Skarzysko
drop name: "Nee Who Yaa!"
he find this place on the bike travel and now he start building 5 m drop 🙂
ps. sory for terrible big size pic
more fotos like http://tinylink.com/?w9uDDSegHY you can see on site:
http://tinylink.com/?0q26i8yHnt
see ya
--
bartek be
url: http://ckf.kielce4u.com/
mail: http://tinyurl.com/shvq
blog: http://stirlitz.blog.as/
Jock said:bartek be wrote:
:: http://80.53.169.26/puti/foto2.JPG
::
:: greetings,
::
:: --
::
:: bartek be
:: url: http://ckf.kielce4u.com/
:: mail: http://tinyurl.com/shvq
:: blog: http://stirlitz.blog.as/ALL,
it's about 3MB to d/l the image. I have crunched it to 101kB if you want it
in my reply to this post.
This is not a binaries newsgroup. Please don't post binaries here.
--
Regards.
Richard.
Jock said::: it's about 3MB to d/l the image. I have crunched it to 101kB if you
:: want it in my reply to this post.
Aaaaaaagh! Too late.
Thank you for hastening the day when this newsgroup is dropped.
--
Regards.
Richard.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>> "Richard" == Richard Sherratt
>> <[email hidden]> writes:
Richard> This is not a binaries newsgroup. Please don't post
Richard> binaries here.
He didn't post a binary, he posted a link to a web page. It's your
choice whether you follow it or not.
Your post is two and a half times the size of the one you're complaining
about.
--
Regards
Euan
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>> "Richard" == Richard Sherratt
>>> <[email hidden]> writes:Richard> This is not a binaries newsgroup. Please don't post
Richard> binaries here.He didn't post a binary, he posted a link to a web page. It's your
choice whether you follow it or not.
Actually, if you are reading this thread in a newsreader
and not on cyclingforums.com, you'll see Jock did post
a binary...
That's one of the problems with the cyclingforums.com.
hippy
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>> "hippy" == hippy <[email hidden]> writes:
hippy> Actually, if you are reading this thread in a newsreader and
hippy> not on cyclingforums.com, you'll see Jock did post a
hippy> binary...
hippy> That's one of the problems with the cyclingforums.com.
hippy> hippy
Gnus is a news reader. Maybe TPG, my ISP, strips binaries in non-binary
groups?
I've never been to cyclingforums.com.
--
Regards
Euan
Quoted message said:Originally posted by Euan B U
hippy> Actually, if you are reading this thread in a newsreader an
hippy> not on cyclingforums.com, you'll see Jock did post
hippy> binary..
Quoted message said:Gnus is a news reader. Maybe TPG, my ISP, strips binaries in non
binary groups
Could be. Netspace and Bigpond don't seem to do this so I get to see th
binaries :
www.cyclingforums.com - check it ou
hipp
-
[email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote in message
[email hidden]
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>> "hippy" == hippy <[email hidden]> writes:
hippy> Actually, if you are reading this thread in a newsreader
and hippy> not on cyclingforums.com, you'll see Jock did post a
hippy> binary...hippy> That's one of the problems with the cyclingforums.com.
hippy> hippy
Gnus is a news reader. Maybe TPG, my ISP, strips binaries in
non-binary groups?
Fortunately, many ISPs do just that. It helps protect us against some of
the worst excesses of the world's many morons.
--
"I'm proud that I live in a country where witnessing two hours of bloody,
barbarous torture in gloating detail is considered indicia of religious
piety, whereas a mere second gazing upon a woman's breast is cause for
outraged apoplexy."
Betty Bowers, http://www.bettybowers.com/melgibsonpassion.html
Richard,
I was going to post the file to a binaries newsgroup, I could fine none that
would not contain the relevant parameters for cycling or that all the
various ISP's represented here would have available.
I did not cross post to the original several groups, I warned of the file
attachment in the following post and I also got the file to a fairly small
size by comparison. I reckon I would prefer to d/l ~150kB I was warned
about than clicking on a farking URL (which falsely states it's a .jpg), in
a post with no warning that about 3MB of data was about to be downloaded
because some lamer does not understand the physics of compression.
Set your newsreader up to show post sizes if that may help.
I really fail to see the point of your complaint. How many people were able
to see the compressed file I posted and saved half their night / day
downloading the original larger file ex the URL??
A favour? Not by the crying I have seen here.
/end rant.
Jock
"Richard Sherratt" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:19:32 GMT, "Jock"
| <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >bartek be wrote:
| >:: http://80.53.169.26/puti/foto2.JPG
| >::
| >:: greetings,
| >::
| >:: --
| >::
| >:: bartek be
| >:: url: http://ckf.kielce4u.com/
| >:: mail: http://tinyurl.com/shvq
| >:: blog: http://stirlitz.blog.as/
| >
| >
| >ALL,
| >it's about 3MB to d/l the image. I have crunched it to 101kB if you want
it
| >in my reply to this post.
|
| This is not a binaries newsgroup. Please don't post binaries here.
|
|
| --
| Regards.
| Richard.
Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
[email hidden]
Quoted message said:Richard,
I was going to post the file to a binaries newsgroup, I could fine
none that would not contain the relevant parameters for cycling or
that all the various ISP's represented here would have available.
I did not cross post to the original several groups, I warned of the
file attachment in the following post and I also got the file to a
fairly small size by comparison. I reckon I would prefer to d/l
~150kB I was warned about than clicking on a farking URL (which
falsely states it's a .jpg), in a post with no warning that about 3MB
of data was about to be downloaded because some lamer does not
understand the physics of compression.
Set your newsreader up to show post sizes if that may help.
I really fail to see the point of your complaint. How many people
were able to see the compressed file I posted and saved half their
night / day downloading the original larger file ex the URL??
A favour? Not by the crying I have seen here.
/end rant.
Oh, great. A moron trying to justify posting a binary to a non-binary group
who also top-posts. If you've got an image to share put it on your web
site. Bigpond gives you that megabyte allowance for free. Use it.
--
A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
zzzzz.
You are a tedious person.
Jock
"DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
| Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| [email hidden]
| > Richard,
| > I was going to post the file to a binaries newsgroup, I could fine
| > none that would not contain the relevant parameters for cycling or
| > that all the various ISP's represented here would have available.
| > I did not cross post to the original several groups, I warned of the
| > file attachment in the following post and I also got the file to a
| > fairly small size by comparison. I reckon I would prefer to d/l
| > ~150kB I was warned about than clicking on a farking URL (which
| > falsely states it's a .jpg), in a post with no warning that about 3MB
| > of data was about to be downloaded because some lamer does not
| > understand the physics of compression.
| > Set your newsreader up to show post sizes if that may help.
| > I really fail to see the point of your complaint. How many people
| > were able to see the compressed file I posted and saved half their
| > night / day downloading the original larger file ex the URL??
| > A favour? Not by the crying I have seen here.
| > /end rant.
|
| Oh, great. A moron trying to justify posting a binary to a non-binary
group
| who also top-posts. If you've got an image to share put it on your web
| site. Bigpond gives you that megabyte allowance for free. Use it.
|
| --
|
| A: Top-posters.
| Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
|
|
Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
[email hidden]
Quoted message said:zzzzz.
You are a tedious person.
You are a stupid, selfish [censored].
--
"I'm proud that I live in a country where witnessing two hours of bloody,
barbarous torture in gloating detail is considered indicia of religious
piety, whereas a mere second gazing upon a woman's breast is cause for
outraged apoplexy."
Betty Bowers, http://www.bettybowers.com/melgibsonpassion.html
Here's a tissue...
Jock
"DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
| Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| [email hidden]
| > zzzzz.
| > You are a tedious person.
|
| You are a stupid, selfish [censored].
|
| --
|
| "I'm proud that I live in a country where witnessing two hours of bloody,
| barbarous torture in gloating detail is considered indicia of religious
| piety, whereas a mere second gazing upon a woman's breast is cause for
| outraged apoplexy."
| Betty Bowers, http://www.bettybowers.com/melgibsonpassion.html
|
|
Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
[email hidden]
Quoted message said:Here's a tissue...
What do you think it says about you that you choose to persist in doing the
wrong thing simply because it is the wrong thing? Ah, but you don't think.
--
"I'm proud that I live in a country where witnessing two hours of bloody,
barbarous torture in gloating detail is considered indicia of religious
piety, whereas a mere second gazing upon a woman's breast is cause for
outraged apoplexy."
Betty Bowers, http://www.bettybowers.com/melgibsonpassion.html
What am I doing wrong? you are using OE newsreader, you are changing the way
OE wants you to post, indeed, you are the one scrolling down to put your
text out of the way of the people using OE so that they have to scroll down
and read the trite comments you post.
You are the one with a problem. Not me.
Jock
"DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
| Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| [email hidden]
| > Here's a tissue...
|
| What do you think it says about you that you choose to persist in doing
the
| wrong thing simply because it is the wrong thing? Ah, but you don't
think.
|
| --
|
| "I'm proud that I live in a country where witnessing two hours of bloody,
| barbarous torture in gloating detail is considered indicia of religious
| piety, whereas a mere second gazing upon a woman's breast is cause for
| outraged apoplexy."
| Betty Bowers, http://www.bettybowers.com/melgibsonpassion.html
|
|
Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
[email hidden]
Quoted message said:What am I doing wrong?
You know full well that top-posting is what you are doing wrong.
Quoted message said:you are using OE newsreader, you are changing
the way OE wants you to post, indeed, you are the one scrolling down
to put your text out of the way of the people using OE so that they
have to scroll down and read the trite comments you post.
You are the one with a problem. Not me.
I'm the one showing everybody else the courtesy and forethought of never
putting the answer before the question. Microsoft's bad design is not a
valid excuse for being selfish and lazy. Use OE-QuoteFix:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/.
--
A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
Just because I top post, you get all excited.
Am I the first and only person who top posts?
You better get your sewing finished soon and get busy trawling usenet being
the netcop and tell every other person in the world who is not as anally
retentive as yourself to do as you say, or, or, or you will hold your breath
till you explode!!
This may be of use, you seem to need one: http://www.grip-it.com/
Kind regards
Jock
DRS wrote:
:: Jock <[email hidden]> wrote in message
:: [email hidden]
::: What am I doing wrong?
::
:: You know full well that top-posting is what you are doing wrong.
::
::: you are using OE newsreader, you are changing
::: the way OE wants you to post, indeed, you are the one scrolling
::: down to put your text out of the way of the people using OE so that
::: they have to scroll down and read the trite comments you post.
::: You are the one with a problem. Not me.
::
:: I'm the one showing everybody else the courtesy and forethought of
:: never putting the answer before the question. Microsoft's bad
:: design is not a valid excuse for being selfish and lazy. Use
:: OE-QuoteFix: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/.
::
:: --
::
:: A: Top-posters.
:: Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.