<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Hello,
I'm looking to build a new full suspension MTB and would like to fit disc brakes. What XC fork can I best use to fit disc brakes,
Rock Shox SID Marzocchi Marathon SL Manitou Skareb
Also which is the better disc brake choise, Magura Louise or FOrmula B4 pro?
greeting, from holland,
Joost Smeets
I've been very happy with my Marzocchi Marathon (air spring) and Hope Mini hydraulic disc brake combo on my Intense Tracer. The 1999 SID I had was very flexy and the damping cartridge either blew on the first ride or was largely inneffective. I've no experience with the Manitou.
I'm looking to build a new full suspension MTB and would like to fit disc brakes. What XC fork can I best use to fit disc brakes,
Rock Shox SID Marzocchi Marathon SL Manitou Skareb
Also which is the better disc brake choise, Magura Louise or FOrmula B4 pro?
greeting, from holland,
Joost Smeets
Unless you are a top 5 XC rider in your country, sponsored and with a private mechanic I would stay away from the B4 (pro, team or else). Sure they brake decently (for someone under the 70kilo-155lb mark) for the first year, then problems arrise. IMHO, its too fragile for anything else than pro XC racing.
BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.
"S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Unless you are a top 5 XC rider in your country, sponsored and with a private mechanic I would stay away from the B4 (pro, team or else). Sure they brake decently (for someone under the 70kilo-155lb mark) for the
first
Quoted message said:
year, then problems arrise. IMHO, its too fragile for anything else than
pro
Quoted message said:
XC racing.
BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.
S.B
I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the 2003 models. What's your beef with it? -- Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.
"D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1068834242.111464@rh9cache2...
Quoted message said:
"S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.
Quoted message said:
I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the
2003
Quoted message said:
models. What's your beef with it?
That it's not beef-Y enough? (arr-arr.)
I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...
"Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1068834242.111464@rh9cache2...
Quoted message said:
"S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.
Quoted message said:
I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the
2003
Quoted message said:
models. What's your beef with it?
That it's not beef-Y enough? (arr-arr.)
I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...
Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.
I also have the '02 and Hope Mini's no complaints about lack of 'stiffness' here. ;^) I did have a problem with the negative cartridge filling with oil and getting stuck down lowering my travel. I rebuilt the fork myself using Bel-Ray 7wt fork oil and have had no problems since.
"Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks, don't
really
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
know if difference would be discernable...
Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.
I also have the '02 and Hope Mini's no complaints about lack of
'stiffness'
Quoted message said:
here. ;^) I did have a problem with the negative cartridge filling with oil and getting stuck down lowering my travel. I rebuilt the fork myself using Bel-Ray 7wt fork oil and have had no problems since.
Mike
I've no problems at all with it using Hayes discs either. As a matter of fact, there used to be an issue of the brakes sometimes chattering under heavy braking, only on occasion and only when I used a SID XC with the Hayes. I _think_ that was a flex issue attributable to the fork. The Marzocchi seems to have totally eliminated that. I hope I don't have to mess with the negative cartridge. So far so good. I also learned eventually that mine was not leaking air from the negative chamber, either, as some other have reported. It was in fact just losing enough air while removing the pump that when I rechecked it on future rides, it was always lower than expected. Now, I just pump it a good 15psi or so higher than I actually want to attain, and it works out okay. I confirmed this by pumping it up, then immediately after removing the pump, I would check it out, and it was always down from where I had set it. Doesn't seem to be leaking down at all; I just had to learn that little caveat involved in setting it up. -- Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.
"D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at
Speedgoat
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks, don't
really
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
know if difference would be discernable...
Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.
I also have the '02 and Hope Mini's no complaints about lack of
'stiffness'
Quoted message said:
here. ;^) I did have a problem with the negative cartridge filling
with
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
oil and getting stuck down lowering my travel. I rebuilt the fork
myself
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
using Bel-Ray 7wt fork oil and have had no problems since.
Mike
I've no problems at all with it using Hayes discs either. As a matter
of
Quoted message said:
fact, there used to be an issue of the brakes sometimes chattering under heavy braking, only on occasion and only when I used a SID XC with the Hayes. I _think_ that was a flex issue attributable to the fork. The Marzocchi seems to have totally eliminated that. I hope I don't have to mess with the negative cartridge. So far so
good.
Quoted message said:
I also learned eventually that mine was not leaking air from the negative chamber, either, as some other have reported. It was in fact just losing enough air while removing the pump that when I rechecked it on future
rides,
Quoted message said:
it was always lower than expected. Now, I just pump it a good 15psi or so higher than I actually want to attain, and it works out okay. I confirmed this by pumping it up, then immediately after removing the pump, I would check it out, and it was always down from where I had set it. Doesn't seem to be leaking down at all; I just had to learn that little caveat involved in setting it up. --
You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge and it spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge maintenance isn't that bad.
"Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge and
it
Quoted message said:
spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge maintenance isn't that bad.
Man, I hope I don't get to learn that! I don't want to learn that!!! Glad to hear the fix isn't bad, though. I haven't had to touch the fork other than air setup and spraying stanchions with silicone before every other ride or so to keep it buttery smooth. I have my old SID XC still waiting for me to tear it down and replace the O-rings and oil, so I hope I get the gumption to learn that first. I'm hoping I can get away with a couple years of use on the Marathon before I'm forced to tear into it, but that might be too optimistic. I better get the SID ready sometime this winter so that at least I won't be left forkless if the Marathon gives any trouble. -- Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.
"D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1068834242.111464@rh9cache2...
Quoted message said:
"S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.
Quoted message said:
I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the
2003
Quoted message said:
models. What's your beef with it?
That it's not beef-Y enough? (arr-arr.)
I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...
I hear mechanical disks are only as good as v brakes, if you are riding in dry conditions. Hydraulics are supposed to be better though.
"D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1069030950.492107@rh9cache2...
Quoted message said:
"Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge
and
Quoted message said:
it
Quoted message said:
spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge maintenance isn't that bad.
Man, I hope I don't get to learn that! I don't want to learn that!!! Glad to hear the fix isn't bad, though. I haven't had to touch the
fork
Quoted message said:
other than air setup and spraying stanchions with silicone before every other ride or so to keep it buttery smooth. I have my old SID XC still waiting for me to tear it down and replace the O-rings and oil, so I hope I get the gumption to learn that first. I'm hoping I can get away with a couple years of use on the Marathon before
I'm
Quoted message said:
forced to tear into it, but that might be too optimistic. I better get the SID ready sometime this winter so that at least I won't be left forkless
if
Quoted message said:
the Marathon gives any trouble. --
It's really not that big a deal. Just keep a rag ready to catch any oil that may come out. There is only an ounce of oil in that leg for lubrication, but it'll ruin a set of brake pads if you get it on them. But you can still ride the fork after you put air back in. It only took me a couple hours/beers one evening to do maintenance on it. I put a rigid fork on my hardtail rather than ride that SID again.
Arpit <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:35:07 GMT, "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...
I hear mechanical disks are only as good as v brakes, if you are riding in dry conditions. Hydraulics are supposed to be better though.
You heard wrong, mech. disk vs. V-brakes. You're correct about hydraulics, however. -- Jonesy
In article <1069030950.492107@rh9cache2>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
"Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge and
it
Quoted message said:
spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge maintenance isn't that bad.
Man, I hope I don't get to learn that! I don't want to learn that!!! Glad to hear the fix isn't bad, though. I haven't had to touch the fork other than air setup and spraying stanchions with silicone before every other ride or so to keep it buttery smooth. I have my old SID XC still waiting for me to tear it down and replace the O-rings and oil, so I hope I get the gumption to learn that first. I'm hoping I can get away with a couple years of use on the Marathon before I'm forced to tear into it, but that might be too optimistic. I better get the SID ready sometime this winter so that at least I won't be left forkless if the Marathon gives any trouble. -- Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.
I found a simple and effective solution to SID XC maintence, it also reduces the wet nooddle effect. Remove lower legs, fill lower legs with quick set mortar. Replace lower legs and wipe excess mortar away from pathetic "Triple X" seals which can not even hold back wet cement. Allow to cure 12-24 hours. -- _________________________ Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.comOpen ↗