Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Forks and disc brakes

Started by j-smeets · · Last activity · 13 posts · 1,270 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
13 November 2003
Last activity
17 November 2003
Original author
j-smeets
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,270
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello,

    I'm looking to build a new full suspension MTB and would like to fit disc brakes. What XC fork can I
    best use to fit disc brakes,

    Rock Shox SID Marzocchi Marathon SL Manitou Skareb

    Also which is the better disc brake choise, Magura Louise or FOrmula B4 pro?

    greeting, from holland,

    Joost Smeets

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello,

    I'm looking to build a new full suspension MTB and would like to fit disc brakes. What XC fork can
    I best use to fit disc brakes,

    Rock Shox SID Marzocchi Marathon SL Manitou Skareb

    Also which is the better disc brake choise, Magura Louise or FOrmula B4 pro?

    greeting, from holland,

    Joost Smeets

    I've been very happy with my Marzocchi Marathon (air spring) and Hope Mini hydraulic disc brake
    combo on my Intense Tracer. The 1999 SID I had was very flexy and the damping cartridge either blew
    on the first ride or was largely inneffective. I've no experience with the Manitou.

    Mike

  3. Quoted message said:

    Hello,

    I'm looking to build a new full suspension MTB and would like to fit disc brakes. What XC fork can
    I best use to fit disc brakes,

    Rock Shox SID Marzocchi Marathon SL Manitou Skareb

    Also which is the better disc brake choise, Magura Louise or FOrmula B4 pro?

    greeting, from holland,

    Joost Smeets

    Unless you are a top 5 XC rider in your country, sponsored and with a private mechanic I would
    stay away from the B4 (pro, team or else). Sure they brake decently (for someone under the
    70kilo-155lb mark) for the first year, then problems arrise. IMHO, its too fragile for anything
    else than pro XC racing.

    BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.

    S.B.

  4. "S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Unless you are a top 5 XC rider in your country, sponsored and with a private mechanic I would
    stay away from the B4 (pro, team or else). Sure they brake decently (for someone under the
    70kilo-155lb mark) for the


    first

    Quoted message said:

    year, then problems arrise. IMHO, its too fragile for anything else than


    pro

    Quoted message said:

    XC racing.

    BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.

    S.B

    I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the 2003 models. What's your
    beef with it?
    --
    Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.

  5. "D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1068834242.111464@rh9cache2...

    Quoted message said:

    "S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.

    Quoted message said:

    I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the


    2003

    Quoted message said:

    models. What's your beef with it?

    That it's not beef-Y enough? (arr-arr.)

    I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a
    better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used disks,
    don't really know if difference would be discernable...

    Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.

  6. "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1068834242.111464@rh9cache2...

    Quoted message said:

    "S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.

    Quoted message said:

    I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the


    2003

    Quoted message said:

    models. What's your beef with it?

    That it's not beef-Y enough? (arr-arr.)

    I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was
    a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used
    disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...

    Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.

    I also have the '02 and Hope Mini's no complaints about lack of 'stiffness' here. ;^) I did have a
    problem with the negative cartridge filling with oil and getting stuck down lowering my travel. I
    rebuilt the fork myself using Bel-Ray 7wt fork oil and have had no problems since.

    Mike

  7. "Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03
    was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never
    owned/used disks, don't


    really

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    know if difference would be discernable...

    Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.

    I also have the '02 and Hope Mini's no complaints about lack of


    'stiffness'

    Quoted message said:

    here. ;^) I did have a problem with the negative cartridge filling with oil and getting stuck
    down lowering my travel. I rebuilt the fork myself using Bel-Ray 7wt fork oil and have had no
    problems since.

    Mike

    I've no problems at all with it using Hayes discs either. As a matter of fact, there used to be
    an issue of the brakes sometimes chattering under heavy braking, only on occasion and only when
    I used a SID XC with the Hayes. I _think_ that was a flex issue attributable to the fork. The
    Marzocchi seems to have totally eliminated that. I hope I don't have to mess with the negative
    cartridge. So far so good. I also learned eventually that mine was not leaking air from the
    negative chamber, either, as some other have reported. It was in fact just losing enough air
    while removing the pump that when I rechecked it on future rides, it was always lower than
    expected. Now, I just pump it a good 15psi or so higher than I actually want to attain, and it
    works out okay. I confirmed this by pumping it up, then immediately after removing the pump, I
    would check it out, and it was always down from where I had set it. Doesn't seem to be leaking
    down at all; I just had to learn that little caveat involved in setting it up.
    --
    Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.

  8. "D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at


    Speedgoat

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    suggested that the '03 was a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002
    model. Having never owned/used disks, don't


    really

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    know if difference would be discernable...

    Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.

    I also have the '02 and Hope Mini's no complaints about lack of


    'stiffness'

    Quoted message said:

    here. ;^) I did have a problem with the negative cartridge filling


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    oil and getting stuck down lowering my travel. I rebuilt the fork


    myself

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    using Bel-Ray 7wt fork oil and have had no problems since.

    Mike

    I've no problems at all with it using Hayes discs either. As a matter


    of

    Quoted message said:

    fact, there used to be an issue of the brakes sometimes chattering under heavy braking, only on
    occasion and only when I used a SID XC with the Hayes. I _think_ that was a flex issue
    attributable to the fork. The Marzocchi seems to have totally eliminated that. I hope I don't have
    to mess with the negative cartridge. So far so


    good.

    Quoted message said:

    I also learned eventually that mine was not leaking air from the negative chamber, either, as some
    other have reported. It was in fact just losing enough air while removing the pump that when I
    rechecked it on future


    rides,

    Quoted message said:

    it was always lower than expected. Now, I just pump it a good 15psi or so higher than I actually
    want to attain, and it works out okay. I confirmed this by pumping it up, then immediately after
    removing the pump, I would check it out, and it was always down from where I had set it. Doesn't
    seem to be leaking down at all; I just had to learn that little caveat involved in setting it up.
    --

    You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge and it spews fork oil all over
    and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge maintenance isn't that bad.

    Mike

  9. "Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge and


    it

    Quoted message said:

    spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge
    maintenance isn't that bad.

    Man, I hope I don't get to learn that! I don't want to learn that!!! Glad to hear the fix
    isn't bad, though. I haven't had to touch the fork other than air setup and spraying
    stanchions with silicone before every other ride or so to keep it buttery smooth. I have my
    old SID XC still waiting for me to tear it down and replace the O-rings and oil, so I hope I
    get the gumption to learn that first. I'm hoping I can get away with a couple years of use on
    the Marathon before I'm forced to tear into it, but that might be too optimistic. I better get
    the SID ready sometime this winter so that at least I won't be left forkless if the Marathon
    gives any trouble.
    --
    Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.

  10. Sorni said:

    "D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1068834242.111464@rh9cache2...

    Quoted message said:

    "S.B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    BTW - Marzocchi Marathon (not the 2002 model), either S or SL.

    Quoted message said:

    I have the 2002 Marathon S. It's a great fork! And lighter than the


    2003

    Quoted message said:

    models. What's your beef with it?

    That it's not beef-Y enough? (arr-arr.)

    I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was a
    better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used
    disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...


    I hear mechanical disks are only as good as v brakes, if you are riding in dry conditions.
    Hydraulics are supposed to be better though.

    Quoted message said:

    Bill "just BS-in' about SB's meaning" S.

  11. "D H" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1069030950.492107@rh9cache2...

    Quoted message said:

    "Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge


    and

    Quoted message said:

    it

    Quoted message said:

    spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge
    maintenance isn't that bad.

    Man, I hope I don't get to learn that! I don't want to learn that!!! Glad to hear the fix
    isn't bad, though. I haven't had to touch the


    fork

    Quoted message said:

    other than air setup and spraying stanchions with silicone before every other ride or so to keep
    it buttery smooth. I have my old SID XC still waiting for me to tear it down and replace the
    O-rings and oil, so I hope I get the gumption to learn that first. I'm hoping I can get away with
    a couple years of use on the Marathon before


    I'm

    Quoted message said:

    forced to tear into it, but that might be too optimistic. I better get the SID ready sometime this
    winter so that at least I won't be left forkless


    if

    Quoted message said:

    the Marathon gives any trouble.
    --

    It's really not that big a deal. Just keep a rag ready to catch any oil that may come out. There is
    only an ounce of oil in that leg for lubrication, but it'll ruin a set of brake pads if you get it
    on them. But you can still ride the fork after you put air back in. It only took me a couple
    hours/beers one evening to do maintenance on it. I put a rigid fork on my hardtail rather than ride
    that SID again.

    Mike

  12. Arpit <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:35:07 GMT, "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have the '02 Marathon S, too, but I use V-brakes. Chris at Speedgoat suggested that the '03 was
    a better choice for disk brakes, as it was stiffer than the 2002 model. Having never owned/used
    disks, don't really know if difference would be discernable...

    I hear mechanical disks are only as good as v brakes, if you are riding in dry conditions.
    Hydraulics are supposed to be better though.


    You heard wrong, mech. disk vs. V-brakes. You're correct about hydraulics, however.
    --
    Jonesy

  13. In article <1069030950.492107@rh9cache2>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Michael Dart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    You'll know when you release the pressure from the negative cartridge and


    it

    Quoted message said:

    spews fork oil all over and it runs down the fork leg into your disc caliper. :^( The cartridge
    maintenance isn't that bad.

    Man, I hope I don't get to learn that! I don't want to learn that!!! Glad to hear the fix
    isn't bad, though. I haven't had to touch the fork other than air setup and spraying
    stanchions with silicone before every other ride or so to keep it buttery smooth. I have my
    old SID XC still waiting for me to tear it down and replace the O-rings and oil, so I hope I
    get the gumption to learn that first. I'm hoping I can get away with a couple years of use on
    the Marathon before I'm forced to tear into it, but that might be too optimistic. I better get
    the SID ready sometime this winter so that at least I won't be left forkless if the Marathon
    gives any trouble.
    --
    Off to ride the mountains, D H Reply to newsgroup. Spam is out of control.

    I found a simple and effective solution to SID XC maintence, it also reduces the wet nooddle
    effect. Remove lower legs, fill lower legs with quick set mortar. Replace lower legs and wipe
    excess mortar away from pathetic "Triple X" seals which can not even hold back wet cement. Allow to
    cure 12-24 hours.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia ramsays-online.comramsays-online.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.