This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
I never understood just why there was a presumption that he would be hopeless. Obviously he just plain lost his [censored] two years ago, but that's not as hard to fix as not being able to ride. And while I wouldn't expect him to hang with the best TT riders I don't see why a guy who can climb like that wouldn't beat the rest of the dog pile.
This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
Quoted message said:
I never understood just why there was a presumption that he would be hopeless. Obviously he just plain lost his [censored] two years ago, but that's not as hard to fix as not being able to ride. And while I wouldn't expect him to hang with the best TT riders I don't see why a guy who can climb like that wouldn't beat the rest of the dog pile.
I agree, but i've never seen anyone in but meself in rbr expressing that. Actally the St Etinnene TT wasn't all that bad, he spent more than 4 miunttes off the bike durring that TT. Assuming he would have stayed on the bike he wouldn't have lost more than 3 minuttes to Armstong and 2.30 to Ulrich.
This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
I never understood just why there was a presumption that he would be hopeless. Obviously he just plain lost his [censored] two years ago, but that's not as hard to fix as not being able to ride. And while I wouldn't expect him to hang with the best TT riders I don't see why a guy who can climb like that wouldn't beat the rest of the dog pile.
I agree, but i've never seen anyone in but meself in rbr expressing that. Actally the St Etinnene TT wasn't all that bad, he spent more than 4 miunttes off the bike durring that TT. Assuming he would have stayed on the bike he wouldn't have lost more than 3 minuttes to Armstong and 2.30 to Ulrich.
Part of being good at TTs is being prepared, and mentally or physically, he wasn't prepared. The difference in 2007 is that on the evidence of the picture links Shayana posted, he's actually spent some time riding his TT bike this year, or if not that, at least he spent some time getting a fit for a proper TT position.
I don't think he is going to put as much time into everyone else in the remaining mountain stages as many in RBR seem to think; so I don't think he will have much of a cushion if any by the final TT.
I agree, but i've never seen anyone in but meself in rbr expressing that. Actally the St Etinnene TT wasn't all that bad, he spent more than 4 miunttes off the bike durring that TT. Assuming he would have stayed on the bike he wouldn't have lost more than 3 minuttes to Armstong and 2.30 to Ulrich.
Quoted message said:
Part of being good at TTs is being prepared, and mentally or physically, he wasn't prepared. The difference in 2007 is that on the evidence of the picture links Shayana posted, he's actually spent some time riding his TT bike this year, or if not that, at least he spent some time getting a fit for a proper TT position.
Quoted message said:
I don't think he is going to put as much time into everyone else in the remaining mountain stages as many in RBR seem to think; so I don't think he will have much of a cushion if any by the final TT.
He bolstered his cushion with antother 2:04 to Evans and Kloeden today. Now he only has to hang on to Contador.
"Morten Reippuert Knudsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
Here's the problem - the only reason he did so well was because of that little Cat 4 climb at the start of the stage and the fact that he had clean roads while almost everyone else was riding on wet slippery roads.
He won't have those advantages next Saturday so he'd better have 3-4 minutes advantage in order to stay clear.
I wonder what happened to Valverde. That isn't like him at all.
"Morten Reippuert Knudsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
Here's the problem - the only reason he did so well was because of that little Cat 4 climb at the start of the stage and the fact that he had clean roads while almost everyone else was riding on wet slippery roads.
He won't have those advantages next Saturday so he'd better have 3-4 minutes advantage in order to stay clear.
I wonder what happened to Valverde. That isn't like him at all.
On 07/22/2007 09:29 AM, in article [email hidden], "Morten
Reippuert Knudsen said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I agree, but i've never seen anyone in but meself in rbr expressing that. Actally the St Etinnene TT wasn't all that bad, he spent more than 4 miunttes off the bike durring that TT. Assuming he would have stayed on the bike he wouldn't have lost more than 3 minuttes to Armstong and 2.30 to Ulrich.
Quoted message said:
Part of being good at TTs is being prepared, and mentally or physically, he wasn't prepared. The difference in 2007 is that on the evidence of the picture links Shayana posted, he's actually spent some time riding his TT bike this year, or if not that, at least he spent some time getting a fit for a proper TT position.
Quoted message said:
I don't think he is going to put as much time into everyone else in the remaining mountain stages as many in RBR seem to think; so I don't think he will have much of a cushion if any by the final TT.
He bolstered his cushion with antother 2:04 to Evans and Kloeden today. Now he only has to hang on to Contador.
Michael [censored]-ficken should be thrown out of the Tour for his multiple missed tests over the past couple of years.
Let Contador and Evans fight it out.
-- Steven L. Sheffield stevens at veloworks dot com bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash
"Morten Reippuert Knudsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
Here's the problem - the only reason he did so well was because of that little Cat 4 climb at the start of the stage and the fact that he had clean roads while almost everyone else was riding on wet slippery roads.
Utter nonsense.
1. The only one with really worse conditions was Vinokourov. The top ten started very close to each other 2. Rasmussen didn't do well at the climb at all (Contador did), he only lost 5 seconds to Evans in the last flat miles of the stages
Sorry Tom, your reasoning simply doesn't match with the reality of the stage
Quoted message said:
He won't have those advantages next Saturday so he'd better have 3-4 minutes advantage in order to stay clear.
I wonder what happened to Valverde. That isn't like him at all.
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
And how about the Columbians?? It's a Eurocentric system that works well for those close by. I wonder how many out of competition tests they've sent people to Kazakhstan to conduct? I saw an article this weekend about companies injecting GPS tracking and security chips into their employees, can the UCI be far behind? It's not just a nutcase conspiracy thing anymore, unfortunately. Bill C
Somebody needs to convince Mark Cuban to sponsor a cycling team.
And how about the Columbians?? It's a Eurocentric system that works well for those close by. I wonder how many out of competition tests they've sent people to Kazakhstan to conduct? I saw an article this weekend about companies injecting GPS tracking and security chips into their employees, can the UCI be far behind? It's not just a nutcase conspiracy thing anymore, unfortunately. Bill C
Somebody needs to convince Mark Cuban to sponsor a cycling team.
That would be some SERIOUS theater! I can't even imagine what he'd have to say about the folks running cycling, especially when he wasn't being handed a record fine for every comment. Bill C PS I'm praying they let him buy the Cubs. That'll be fun too.
Actually Vinokurov should be tested by the Kazakh, French and Monaco's cycling federations as well as by UCI's because he lives i France and has a licence from Monaco.
Perhaps they'll have to clone him so he can be in all 3 places at the same time to be tested. Imagine a whole team of Vino clones.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:32:07 +0200, Donald Munro <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Morten Reippuert Knudsen said:
Actually Vinokurov should be tested by the Kazakh, French and Monaco's cycling federations as well as by UCI's because he lives i France and has a licence from Monaco.
Perhaps they'll have to clone him so he can be in all 3 places at the same time to be tested. Imagine a whole team of Vino clones.
They'd tear up the peloton if they'd ever work together. One of 'em would surely win each stage, just that no one of them would win enough for the GC.
His second problem is that the Danish Cycling Federation (like the German) has an ethical charter regarding representation on the national team: Riders has to take part i additional out-of-competition test besides those from the UCI, additional DCU can (as they did in this case) ban rider from the national team even though the rider isn't under suscpicion or hasn't voilated any UCI rules. I'd bet you that neither the Duch, Belgian, French, Spanish, Italian, Ukranian, Russian, Sweedish or American federation has similar strict
All Dutch "international sporters" (a term defined in the antidoping rules) must make their training locations and daily training schedule known to the antidoping authority (DADA..?), every month at least 2 weeks in advance. Out of competition controls can take place any time, unannounced. (Although there was a minor scandal earlier this year when a news show discovered that all the controls they filmed, 3 or 4, *were* announced.) If the official does not meet you (at the training venue, your home or 1 or 2 other addresses you wrote down) he will try another time. If that does not succeed either, he will phone you. There has to be a control within 2h of that call. If not, the sports association will be notified and you will get suspended for 3 months to a year (depending on which assoc).
All Dutch "international sporters" (a term defined in the antidoping rules) must make their training locations and daily training schedule known to the antidoping authority (DADA..?)
"Tuschinski" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:
"Morten Reippuert Knudsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This time Chicken stayed on the bike, and his statement from the restday claiming that he wouldn't loose more than 3 minuttes came true.
Here's the problem - the only reason he did so well was because of that little Cat 4 climb at the start of the stage and the fact that he had clean roads while almost everyone else was riding on wet slippery roads.
Utter nonsense.
1. The only one with really worse conditions was Vinokourov. The top ten started very close to each other
3 minutes x 10 people is a half hour. I don't call that close.
Quoted message said:
2. Rasmussen didn't do well at the climb at all (Contador did), he only lost 5 seconds to Evans in the last flat miles of the stages
The "last flat miles were the last 6.5 km from the Albi suburbs to the finish line. After almost 10 km of downhill in which to "rest" I would hope he would be able to match a rider like Evans. So this means that the Chicken had to hold Evans on the steeper pitches of the climbs. And there wasn't enough of them.
Quoted message said:
Sorry Tom, your reasoning simply doesn't match with the reality of the stage
Well, certainly we'll see how my reasoning works next Saturday.
under suscpicion or hasn't voilated any UCI rules. I'd bet you that neither the Duch, Belgian, French, Spanish, Italian, Ukranian, Russian, Sweedish or American federation has similar strict rules.
Actually Vinokurov should be tested by the Kazakh, French and Monaco's cycling federations as well as by UCI's because he lives i France and has a licence from Monaco.
Perhaps they'll have to clone him so he can be in all 3 places at the same time to be tested. Imagine a whole team of Vino clones.
No, no! Look how much trouble an evil twin caused that poor Mr. Hamilton!
And his little dog, too,
-- Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/ "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos