Food lovers or Self Abuse? LOL

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:23:26 GMT, Dennis G. <[email hidden]>
wrote:

<link snipped>

It's only common courtesy to give at least a breif explanation of a link rather than just posting
the link and expecting people to visit it.

A lot of people (like me) won't even touch a random link with no explanation as to WTF it's about.

-sw

Dennis G. said:

ocweekly.comcover.phpOpen ↗

I love meat (the kind you eat, you sickos (Sheldon)). And for the paranoid, this link is safe.

--
John Gaughan
johngaughan.netjohngaughan.netOpen ↗
[email hidden]

x-no-archive: yes

Steve Wertz said:

A lot of people (like me) won't even touch a random link with no explanation as to WTF it's about.

Maybe nobody cares.

Naomi D.

On 16 Jan 2004 19:51:50 GMT, [email hidden] (Naomi Darvell)

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

A lot of people (like me) won't even touch a random link with no explanation as to WTF it's about.

Maybe nobody cares.

Ahh, yes. Another useless poster speaks.

-sw

On 16 Jan 2004 20:19:10 GMT, [email hidden] (Naomi Darvell)

Quoted message said:

Steve wertz said:

Ahh, yes. Another useless poster speaks.

You know, I've been wondering for a while.

That's not uncommon for AOL'ers.

Quoted message said:

What is it with you, that you have to be so nasty? Do you think it's funny or something?

Ironic how you never speak out against Sheldon Katz, but in fact have congratulated him for being
exactly the loser he is.

Yes, I do think it's funny when hypocrites criticize me.

-sw

Please don't mind Steve. Despite acting like an [censored] sometimes he does contribute positively to
this newsgroup. Pay attention to the good, ignore the bad.

--
John Gaughan
johngaughan.netjohngaughan.netOpen ↗
[email hidden]

"John Gaughan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dennis G. said:

ocweekly.comcover.phpOpen ↗

I love meat (the kind you eat, you sickos (Sheldon)). And for the paranoid, this link is safe.

What if one is not paranoid? Unsafe?? <arf>

Jack Gas

John Gaughan said:

Please don't mind Steve. Despite acting like an [censored] sometimes he does contribute positively to
this newsgroup. Pay attention to the good, ignore the bad.

Note that my original post wasn't much of a flame at all. Just a heads up. Why she felt required to
respond is beyond me. Granted, I should have just stopped there.

-sw

Steve Wertz said:

John Gaughan said:

Please don't mind Steve. Despite acting like an [censored] sometimes he does contribute positively to
this newsgroup. Pay attention to the good, ignore the bad.

Note that my original post wasn't much of a flame at all. Just a heads up. Why she felt required to
respond is beyond me. Granted, I should have just stopped there.

-sw

Your original point was valid (although bluntly put), and the exchange seemed that followed seemed
to come from nowhere. I guess I missed some previous fireworks :>

Sue(tm) Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

Jack Schidt® said:

What if one is not paranoid?

I don't understand. You mean they *aren't* out to get me???

--
John Gaughan
johngaughan.netjohngaughan.netOpen ↗
[email hidden]

Steve Wertz said:

Note that my original post wasn't much of a flame at all.

I agree. However, it was worded in a way such that someone might take offense at it. It would take a
person prone to be defensive, however. I find the toughest part of written communication with people
over the internet is that they can't see my facial expression or other body language that expresses
I am *not* out for blood. I guess that factor was at play here. Oh well.

--
John Gaughan
johngaughan.netjohngaughan.netOpen ↗
[email hidden]

Steve Wertz said:

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:23:26 GMT, Dennis G. <[email hidden]> wrote:

<link snipped>

It's only common courtesy to give at least a breif explanation of a link rather than just posting
the link and expecting people to visit it.

A lot of people (like me) won't even touch a random link with no explanation as to WTF it's about.

-sw

Well, I hope somebody enjoyed the link. I wasn't put on this earth ...etc.

Dennis

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Gaughan said:

Jack Schidt® said:

What if one is not paranoid?

I don't understand. You mean they *aren't* out to get me???

--
John Gaughan

You need a tinfoil hat. <G>

K.

--

Quoted message said:

,,<Cat's Haven Hobby Farm>,,<[email hidden]>,,<

cgi6.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dllOpen ↗

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Gaughan said:

Steve Wertz said:

Note that my original post wasn't much of a flame at all.

I agree. However, it was worded in a way such that someone might take offense at it. It would take
a person prone to be defensive, however. I find the toughest part of written communication with
people over the internet is that they can't see my facial expression or other body language that
expresses I am *not* out for blood. I guess that factor was at play here. Oh well.

--
John Gaughan

That's what emoticons are for... ;-)

They DO help!

K.

--

Quoted message said:

,,<Cat's Haven Hobby Farm>,,<[email hidden]>,,<

cgi6.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dllOpen ↗

"John Gaughan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jack Schidt® said:

What if one is not paranoid?

I don't understand. You mean they *aren't* out to get me???

If you're paranoid, it's valid.

Jack Bumpersticker

John Gaughan said:

Jack Schidt® said:

What if one is not paranoid?

I don't understand. You mean they *aren't* out to get me???

Just because you are paranoid, never means that "They" are not out to get you. Pan Ohco

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:43:07 -0600, Katra <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Depends on the mood Sheldon (or Steve) is in at the moment. <G> Or what they have been
drinking.........

I drink maybe once every 2-3 weeks, and if I do, I'm not sitting in front of the computer most
likely. Not sure where you got that idea.

Sheldon though. Don't know what his story is. Sounds like harder drugs than alcohol.

-sw

In article <[email hidden]>,

Katra said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Gaughan said:

Jack Schidt® said:

What if one is not paranoid?

I don't understand. You mean they *aren't* out to get me???

--
John Gaughan

You need a tinfoil hat. <G>

Here ya go: stopabductions.comstopabductions.comOpen ↗

--
Mark Shaw contact info at homepage --> panix.com~mshawOpen ↗
========================================================================
"Grown men are not comfortable explaining why they want to use the sniper rifle on fictional dogs
with speech impediments." -James Lileks

"Mark Shaw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

John Gaughan said:

Jack Schidt® wrote:
> What if one is not paranoid?

I don't understand. You mean they *aren't* out to get me???

--
John Gaughan

You need a tinfoil hat. <G>

Here ya go: stopabductions.comstopabductions.comOpen ↗

--

You guys are so, like, last year. If you're going to wear a hat, do the right thing and go here:

thescreamonline.comhatsofmeat.htmlOpen ↗

Jack Chapeau