1. Would not look at the damage to the bike, he wouldn't even acknowledge that there was damage 2. Was'nt interested in a "deal" quote "He's only 10 years old, f**k'all you can do about it"
"Centurian_Ooo'yabass" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
If he's got it public liability on his contents insurance should cover it?
It might, I suppose, cover negligence by any member of the household, but there will be no obligation on him to claim on it even if he has it (which is by no means guaranteed). If you sued him, or his child through him, it might give him an incentive to claim. However note that parents are not automatically liable for their child's negligence. To succeed in suing him you would have to establish that he was liable himself due to failure to exercise reasonable care over his child. You can sue a child for negligence, you should should name the child or young person as the defendant and a parent or guardian who can act as the litigation friend. Note that the age of the child or young person will be taken into account when deciding whether behaviour is negligent. There may, however, be no point in suing the child - assuming he will have no money of his own, unless there is insurance cover - the parent will not be liable to pay the son's judgement. Of course, if you succeed in your claim against the child you could try waiting until the child is working before enforcing the judgment. Judgments must be enforced within six years