UK and Europe · Public discussion

Fluids

Started by Simonb · · Last activity · 33 posts · 2,228 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
18 July 2004
Last activity
25 July 2004
Original author
Simonb
Posts
33
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,228
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 33
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On my ride this afternoon, bursting for a pee, I was wondering whether the
    body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once it's
    in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

  2. On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:16:25 +0100, in
    <[email hidden]>, "Simonb"

    Quoted message said:

    On my ride this afternoon, bursting for a pee, I was wondering whether the
    body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once it's
    in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    Once it's there it's useless. Unless you fit a second hose to your
    camelback.

    --
    I remember when the internet was only in black & white.
    It only had a few pages but at least they all worked.

  3. Simonb said:

    On my ride this afternoon, bursting for a pee, I was wondering whether the
    body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once it's
    in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    How funny, I remember asking exactly the same question of my biology teacher 26 years ago. The answer is no.
    It's a funny feeling to be desperate for a pee and incredibly thirsty at the same time.

  4. moet said:
    Simonb said:

    On my ride this afternoon, bursting for a pee, I was wondering
    whether the
    body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once
    it's
    in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    How funny, I remember asking exactly the same question of my biology
    teacher 26 years ago. The answer is no.
    It's a funny feeling to be desperate for a pee and incredibly thirsty
    at the same time.

    I wonder why not? You'd think that if the body was in danger of becoming
    dehydrated, it'd be usful.

  5. Simonb wondered:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    whether the
    body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once
    it's
    in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    I wonder why not? You'd think that if the body was in danger of becoming
    dehydrated, it'd be usful.

    Conserving water is the function of the kidneys. If your body's running
    low on water then the kidneys will conserve more of it, producing
    smaller volumes of more concentrated urine to pass to the bladder. The
    function of the bladder is to hang on to the waste products from the
    kidneys until there's a convenient moment to get rid of it.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  6. Simonb said:
    moet said:
    Simonb said:

    On my ride this afternoon, bursting for a pee, I was wondering
    whether the
    body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once
    it's
    in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    How funny, I remember asking exactly the same question of my biology
    teacher 26 years ago. The answer is no.
    It's a funny feeling to be desperate for a pee and incredibly thirsty
    at the same time.

    I wonder why not? You'd think that if the body was in danger of becoming
    dehydrated, it'd be usful.

    Think about it though, by the time you're dehydrated, the body has
    already scaled back pee production quite significantly - what there is,
    is highly concentrated with the toxins and waste products your body
    wants to be rid of. In fact, it's probably not sufficient to actually
    clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really isn't a lot
    in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's already
    attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)

    --

    Velvet

  7. Velvet said:

    Think about it though, by the time you're dehydrated, the body has
    already scaled back pee production quite significantly - what there
    is, is highly concentrated with the toxins and waste products your
    body wants to be rid of. In fact, it's probably not sufficient to
    actually clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really
    isn't a lot in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's
    already attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)

    You lot! How'd you all come to be so damn clever?

    :-)

  8. Simonb said:
    Velvet said:

    Think about it though, by the time you're dehydrated, the body has
    already scaled back pee production quite significantly - what there
    is, is highly concentrated with the toxins and waste products your
    body wants to be rid of. In fact, it's probably not sufficient to
    actually clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really
    isn't a lot in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's
    already attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)

    You lot! How'd you all come to be so damn clever?

    :-)


    I had to do *something* with my time before I got hooked on this cycling
    thing ;-)

    --

    Velvet

  9. Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Simonb wondered:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >whether the
    >body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once
    >it's
    >in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    I wonder why not? You'd think that if the body was in danger of becoming
    dehydrated, it'd be usful.

    Conserving water is the function of the kidneys. If your body's running
    low on water then the kidneys will conserve more of it, producing
    smaller volumes of more concentrated urine to pass to the bladder. The
    function of the bladder is to hang on to the waste products from the
    kidneys until there's a convenient moment to get rid of it.

    So that explains why darker urine is a sign of being dehydrated? Isn't the
    internet great ;-)

  10. Iain Jones said:

    Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Simonb wondered:

    Quoted message said:

    >>whether the
    >>body is able to draw on fluid stored in the bladder, or whether, once
    >>it's
    >>in there, it's waste and the body cannot use it? Anyone know?

    I wonder why not? You'd think that if the body was in danger of becoming
    dehydrated, it'd be usful.

    Conserving water is the function of the kidneys. If your body's running
    low on water then the kidneys will conserve more of it, producing
    smaller volumes of more concentrated urine to pass to the bladder. The
    function of the bladder is to hang on to the waste products from the
    kidneys until there's a convenient moment to get rid of it.

    So that explains why darker urine is a sign of being dehydrated? Isn't the
    internet great ;-)

    Yup!

    --

    Velvet

  11. Simonb said:

    You lot! How'd you all come to be so damn clever?

    I'm really quite a thicko
    as most of you can tell.
    I leant my stuff from't Daily Mail
    And u.r.c as well.

    James

  12. James Hodson said:
    Simonb said:

    You lot! How'd you all come to be so damn clever?

    I'm really quite a thicko
    as most of you can tell.
    I leant my stuff from't Daily Mail
    And u.r.c as well.

    James

    Hooray!

  13. Simonb said:
    James Hodson said:
    Simonb said:

    You lot! How'd you all come to be so damn clever?

    I'm really quite a thicko
    as most of you can tell.
    I leant my stuff from't Daily Mail
    And u.r.c as well.

    Quoted message said:


    Hooray!

    If only I were lying. :-0

    James

  14. Velvet said:

    In fact, it's probably not sufficient to actually
    clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really isn't a lot
    in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's already
    attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)Velvet

    and yet urine is sterile.

    we can use it to wash wounds with. but not to drink. i dont think we can drink it. what if you stopped to boil it??? i am talking in a desperate situation here.

    I dont know. then you'd have to carry a pot and some flint with you on your bike outings.

  15. JuneBug said:
    Velvet said:

    In fact, it's probably not sufficient to actually
    clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really isn't a lot
    in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's already
    attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)Velvet

    and yet urine is sterile.

    we can use it to wash wounds with. but not to drink. i dont think we
    can drink it. what if you stopped to boil it??? i am talking in a
    desperate situation here.

    Won't be harmful if it's not the urine of a dehydrated person,
    i.e. less saturated than the max your kidneys can make. If it is, it
    may make you lose some water getting rid of it.

    There's people who drink urine. AFAICT, urine's mainly considered
    unpleasant because of social reasons, i.e. if something smells of
    [censored], it's cause there's been someone else there marking it as
    theirs. I don't think we're as far removed from dogs as we like to
    think.

    A

  16. JuneBug said:
    Velvet said:

    In fact, it's probably not sufficient to actually
    clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really isn't a lot
    in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's already
    attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)Velvet

    and yet urine is sterile.

    we can use it to wash wounds with. but not to drink. i dont think we
    can drink it. what if you stopped to boil it??? i am talking in a
    desperate situation here.

    I dont know. then you'd have to carry a pot and some flint with you on
    your bike outings.

    People *have* drunk it, where there's no other alternative (ie, at sea)
    but all it does it tip the waste products straight back into the system
    again, and you use far more water than you pee, so you'd continue to
    dehydrate rapidly.

    Boiling it'd just drive off what water there might be - if you could
    condense the steam then that *might* be drinkable in that sort of
    emergency situation, but personally I'd look for natural sources of dew
    in that sort of situation - leaves, grass, etc. Of course it depends on
    the environment as to whether it's possible, but even in the desert you
    can fashion a dew-collector out of a bit of plastic sheeting, a cup, and
    a few supports. Not that I've done so personally, but seen it done :-)

    --

    Velvet

  17. JuneBug [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:

    and yet urine is sterile.

    Not so much a matter or "sterile" as "toxic".

    Quoted message said:

    we can use it to wash wounds with.

    Because it contains a concentration of toxins which will probably kill
    many bacteria.

    Quoted message said:

    but not to drink. i dont think we
    can drink it. what if you stopped to boil it??? i am talking in a
    desperate situation here.

    The problem is not that it will infect you, but that it is full of
    toxins which your body was trying to get rid of. This means that you
    have to process it again. In extreme circumstances (e.g. Life raft in
    the middle of an ocean. No fresh water. No equipment with which to
    desalinate the sea water.) it is a better source of water, but since you
    will lose water through sweat it cannot be your only supply or you'll
    soon dehydrate.

    Boiling it will only concentrate it further.

    Jon

  18. Velvet said:
    JuneBug said:
    Velvet said:

    In fact, it's probably not sufficient to actually
    clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really isn't a lot
    in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's already
    attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)Velvet

    and yet urine is sterile.

    we can use it to wash wounds with. but not to drink. i dont think we
    can drink it. what if you stopped to boil it??? i am talking in a
    desperate situation here.

    I dont know. then you'd have to carry a pot and some flint with you on
    your bike outings.

    People *have* drunk it, where there's no other alternative (ie, at sea)

    No some people drink it for "health benefits". Apparently quite popular
    in India and Japan (although some people just gargle).

    --
    Andy Leighton => [email hidden]
    "The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
    - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_

  19. Andy Leighton [email hidden] opined the following...

    Quoted message said:

    No some people drink it for "health benefits". Apparently quite popular
    in India and Japan (although some people just gargle).

    Given the proliferation of "Chinese Herbal Doctors" in Edinburgh, I
    sense a fad coming. ;-)

    Jon

  20. in message <[email hidden]>, JuneBug

    (') said:


    Velvet said:

    In fact, it's probably not sufficient to actually
    clear the toxins out of the system fully - so there really isn't a
    lot in there that the body could find useful to recover, it's already
    attempted that bit further up the processing line ;-)Velvet

    and yet urine is sterile.

    we can use it to wash wounds with. but not to drink. i dont think
    we
    can drink it.

    Many people drink their own urine regularly and consider it
    medicinal(!). Seeing it's concentrated poisons your body was trying to
    get rid of this strikes me as pseudo-pscience up there with homeopathy,
    but you can certainly do it regularly and survive. In an emergency you
    could certainly drink it, although, again, as will in those
    circumstances be even more concentrated, I doubt it would do you much
    good (unless you could distill it).

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; lovely alternative to rice.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.