Road Cycling · Public discussion

Floyd speaks (video too)

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 33 posts · 674 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 September 2006
Last activity
15 September 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
33
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
674
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 33
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Cyclist Believes New Findings Will Help Him Retain Tour De France Title

    POSTED: 8:36 am PDT September 8, 2006
    UPDATED: 12:02 pm PDT September 8, 2006

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/9809757/detail.html

    I'm curious to see if they indeed found anything "new" or they are just
    trying to poke some holes in the walls of the lab.

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Cyclist Believes New Findings Will Help Him Retain Tour De France Title

    POSTED: 8:36 am PDT September 8, 2006
    UPDATED: 12:02 pm PDT September 8, 2006

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/9809757/detail.html

    I'm curious to see if they indeed found anything "new" or they are just
    trying to poke some holes in the walls of the lab.

    It will be interesting given the amount of smoke Jacob's blew in the
    Hamilton case. Time will tell--Monday?

  3. Quoted message said:

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/9809757/detail.html

    I'm curious to see if they indeed found anything "new" or they are just
    trying to poke some holes in the walls of the lab.

    We ought to know monday, by the quality of the submission and how much
    supporting data they choose to show.

    Jacobs has sounded optimistic before and come up short.

    -dB

  4. On 9/8/06 4:17 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "B. Lafferty"

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Cyclist Believes New Findings Will Help Him Retain Tour De France Title

    POSTED: 8:36 am PDT September 8, 2006
    UPDATED: 12:02 pm PDT September 8, 2006

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/9809757/detail.html

    I'm curious to see if they indeed found anything "new" or they are just
    trying to poke some holes in the walls of the lab.

    It will be interesting given the amount of smoke Jacob's blew in the
    Hamilton case. Time will tell--Monday?


    Very small......
    Compared to the multi-lingual cannon-fodder aftermath that spews from your
    spokes-hole.........

  5. Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Did he really say 'positive' news?

    Bob Schwartz

  6. NFW -- the UCI and WADA machines will allow the test, process or labs be
    proven in court to be deficient in the execution of their duties. If som
    that would mean anyone else who was positive would have cause to have thier
    case overturned and cause an overhaul of the system. Not going to happen,
    Landis guilty or not, will have to take one for the system. Probably why
    he's talking about it, to get public opinion on his side in advance of UCI's
    politcs to come.

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Cyclist Believes New Findings Will Help Him Retain Tour De France Title

    POSTED: 8:36 am PDT September 8, 2006
    UPDATED: 12:02 pm PDT September 8, 2006

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/9809757/detail.html

    I'm curious to see if they indeed found anything "new" or they are just
    trying to poke some holes in the walls of the lab.

    It will be interesting given the amount of smoke Jacob's blew in the
    Hamilton case. Time will tell--Monday?

  7. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Cyclist Believes New Findings Will Help Him Retain Tour De France Title

    POSTED: 8:36 am PDT September 8, 2006
    UPDATED: 12:02 pm PDT September 8, 2006

    http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/9809757/detail.html

    I'm curious to see if they indeed found anything "new" or they are just
    trying to poke some holes in the walls of the lab.

    It will be interesting given the amount of smoke Jacob's blew in the
    Hamilton case. Time will tell--Monday?

    I'm with you. I hope that on Monday we don't hear that the behavior that
    went against protocol was that there was a leak concerning Floyd's name
    being linked to the A sample. I hope that they have real science that
    proves there was a real mistake.

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bob Schwartz said:
    Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Did he really say 'positive' news?

    Maybe he's more of a smartass than he's been given credit for.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  9. On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:58:19 -0700, Howard Kveck <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bob Schwartz said:
    Quoted message said:

    Landis Says Positive News Coming Soon

    Did he really say 'positive' news?

    Maybe he's more of a smartass than he's been given credit for.

    He ain't dumb and he hangs with Dave Z, who is on a most profound level of
    irony.

    Ron

  10. RonSonic said:

    He ain't dumb and he hangs with Dave Z, who is on a most profound level of
    irony.

    But he's an American, albeit a fairly inoffensive one.

  11. Donald Munro said:
    RonSonic said:

    He ain't dumb and he hangs with Dave Z, who is on a most profound level of
    irony.

    But he's an American, albeit a fairly inoffensive one.

    This [censored] that American's are incredibly offensive is only true if you
    think that success is evil, Israel has no right to exist, nothing is
    worth fighting for, Arab States that declare Israel has no right to
    exist and forced conversions are good, appeasement is the answer, and
    that the UN actually works. Other than that I can point you to just
    about any country's folks being totally obnoxious too.
    Bill C
    Support Palestine! Wipe out the Jews!
    http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/arafat_en.html

  12. RonSonic said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He ain't dumb and he hangs with Dave Z, who is on a most profound level of
    irony.

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    But he's an American, albeit a fairly inoffensive one.

    Bill C said:

    This [censored] that American's are incredibly offensive is only true if you
    think that success is evil, Israel has no right to exist, nothing is
    worth fighting for,

    Dumbass,
    If Z groks irony then nothing is worth fighting for because the world will
    end soon according to the Steward Theory. Don't worry though, with a name
    like Zabriskie I suspect he is really a Kazakh mole (the Kazakh secret
    service don't have a very big budget). After all Vino is both the head of
    the Kazakh SS and an active agent (why do you think he disrupted Telecom
    team tactics last year ?).

    Quoted message said:

    Support Palestine! Wipe out the Jews!
    http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/arafat_en.html

    How exactly did you get from Zabriskie grokking irony to wiping out jews ?

  13. in message <[email hidden]>, Donald Munro

    (') said:

    How exactly did you get from Zabriskie grokking irony to wiping out jews?

    Simple. Anyone who questions the least detail of the divine and perfect
    guidance of the President of the United States is a atheistic commie
    Satan-worshipper and closet Nazi. All such people wish to destroy Zion and
    replace the last remnants of the Temple of JWH with a shrine to the axis
    of evil. Didn't you know this?

    By the way, what does 'irony' mean?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

  14. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Donald Munro

    (') said:

    How exactly did you get from Zabriskie grokking irony to wiping out jews?

    Simple. Anyone who questions the least detail of the divine and perfect
    guidance of the President of the United States is a atheistic commie
    Satan-worshipper and closet Nazi. All such people wish to destroy Zion and
    replace the last remnants of the Temple of JWH with a shrine to the axis
    of evil. Didn't you know this?

    By the way, what does 'irony' mean?

    The way fabric gets after you iron it. You know, "gullible" isn't in
    the dictionary/

    -dB

  15. Simon Brooke said:

    By the way, what does 'irony' mean?

    Dunno, I think it might be something New Zealanders do with sheep.

  16. "Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    By the way, what does 'irony' mean?

    Dunno, I think it might be something New Zealanders do with sheep.

    "I, Ronny" was how Reagan took the Oath.

  17. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Donald Munro

    (') said:

    How exactly did you get from Zabriskie grokking irony to wiping out jews?

    Simple. Anyone who questions the least detail of the divine and perfect
    guidance of the President of the United States is a atheistic commie
    Satan-worshipper and closet Nazi. All such people wish to destroy Zion and
    replace the last remnants of the Temple of JWH with a shrine to the axis
    of evil. Didn't you know this?

    By the way, what does 'irony' mean?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

    Well Simon I guess I qualify as all those things you've stated because
    I think almost all of our leadership are criminal scumbags with their
    own agenda which has nothing to do with the good of the US or any but
    them.
    What we do have from a large percentage of our British friends is that
    the IRA is a criminal scumbag terrorist outfit, and there is much more
    of a valid justification for the English to run Northern Ireland than
    for the Israelis, who as a recognizeable people have been living there
    for thousands of years.
    Europe has repeatedly answered in polls in recent years that Israel is
    the biggest problem, and many have said that if Israel was replaced by
    Palestine which should be there then everything would be fine and
    peaceful.
    That's garbage. George Galloway was at least as dirty as our
    politicians and took [censored] of money from Hussein.
    Especially on this anniversary it's really sad to see most of the
    world rallying to the core causes the terrorists are pushing for.
    How many REAL IRA members are now British MPs? You keep telling us
    that we need to recognize and therefore legitimize groups such as
    Hezbullah and Hamas.
    They make NO secret of their Nazi connections, Mein Kampf was the
    number one seller in large areas of the M.E. in the 90s.
    Grand Mufti Husseini who is their most venerated spiritual leader of
    the 20th century organised SS battalions for [censored] and was one of the
    people who helped push the "Final Solution". Arafat as late as the 80s
    kept a picture of Husseini with [censored] on his office wall. He later
    switched to just one of Husseini. Husseini is cited over and over by
    Islamic Leaders and Pana Arabists as THE example of what they need to
    be.
    They keep screaming at us just what they want to do to us, and people
    here in the west keep supporting them?
    How can you justify that in any way, shape, or form? And let's not try
    the, "it's not the people, it's only their leaders." bit. There have
    been way too many historical examples of how quickly, and with gusto,
    the "innocent" people are happy to slaughter anyone they can get their
    hands on. The "people" are just as responsible, and more dangerous.
    It's not on that scale, but the blind devotion of a lot of Americans
    to the current administration is a perfect example. They just can't
    seem to do anything to make the core 35% or so even think twice.
    American bashing is SO in vogue, but where is the bashing of the
    Chinese for exterminating Tibet as anything meaningful? How about
    France, Germany, and especially Russia blatantly violating the UN
    sanctions against Hussein, including shipping him military equipment
    and advisers? How about the fact that Europe and the UN, without the US
    willingness to send troops has watched the catastrophe in Sudan while
    doing nothing effective, and it looks like it's going to spiral out of
    control again?
    Everyone has their share of obnoxious, virulent, jackasses.
    That's the only point I was making, but unless you actually are in
    Europe to hear the folks on the Continent [censored] about the "drunken"
    Brits, or the "Rude" Germans, etc...there is no bashing, and certainly
    nothing on the scale of American bashing.
    Certainly we deserve our share, but GOD Forbid, when Americans bash
    back.
    A huge part of it is that we have been way to active around the globe.
    We should've pulled out of Europe almost completely after the Soviet
    Union broke up. We should cut our funding of the UN to the average of
    the top 5 contributors, same for troops, supplies, etc...
    We should get the hell out of the Middle East and Far East and let the
    UN defend Taiwan and S. Korea.
    I'd love America to sit back and do nothing more than the average of
    the security council and then see what the [censored] was.
    Bill C

  18. RonSonic said:

    In Israel, Muslims and Arabs vote and hold public office and are
    elected to the Knesset. Are you going to pretend, even for a moment,
    that any majority Muslim political entity in the Middle East is going
    to offer Jews the same?

    Please show me an example of where this is actually happening that
    might serve as a precedent.

    Hmmm. How about this as a precedent:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/10/AR2006091000951.html

  19. Robert Chung said:
    RonSonic said:

    In Israel, Muslims and Arabs vote and hold public office and are
    elected to the Knesset. Are you going to pretend, even for a moment,
    that any majority Muslim political entity in the Middle East is going
    to offer Jews the same?

    Please show me an example of where this is actually happening that
    might serve as a precedent.

    Hmmm. How about this as a precedent:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/10/AR2006091000951.html

    Compare and contrast that with the Saudis' moderate stance on
    religion. They are "moderates" because they aren't actively calling for
    the extermination of Israel. The only vaguely moderate states you could
    point to IMO would be Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon and Lebanon is falling
    out of that group.
    Bill C

  20. Robert Chung said:
    RonSonic said:

    In Israel, Muslims and Arabs vote and hold public office and are
    elected to the Knesset. Are you going to pretend, even for a moment,
    that any majority Muslim political entity in the Middle East is going
    to offer Jews the same?

    Please show me an example of where this is actually happening that
    might serve as a precedent.

    Hmmm. How about this as a precedent:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/10/AR2006091000951.html

    Compare and contrast that with the Saudis' moderate stance on
    religion. They are "moderates" because they aren't actively calling for
    the extermination of Israel. The only vaguely moderate states you could
    point to IMO would be Jordan, Egypt, and Lebanon and Lebanon is falling
    out of that group.
    Bill C

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.